Fatty acids profile and nutritional composition of two tropical diatoms from the Costa Rican Pacific Coast

K. Rodríguez-Núñez and P. Toledo-Agüero a Programa de Magíster en Acuicultura, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile. b Estación de Biología Marina, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Avenida 1 Calle 1, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica. c Departamento de Acuicultura, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile. Corresponding Authors: karen.rodriguez01@ucn.cl; ptoledo@ucn.cl


INTRODUCTION
Microalgae are an important source of nutrients and food for diverse organisms (Conceição et al., 2010).This importance arises due to a number of key characteristics of microalgae, including cell size, ease of production, protein and lipid contents and quality (Renaud et al., 1994;Huerlimann et al., 2010).Under appropriate conditions, these microorganisms can duplicate in biomass during the logarithmic growth phase in less than 24 h, although this rate varies among species (Abou-Shanab et al., 2011).After the establishment of an algal culture, their nutritional value must be determined; particularly, the protein and lipid contents are the most important organic components to consider (Huerlimann et al., 2010).
The biochemical composition of microalgae varies among species, although culture conditions are generally similar.However, each microalgae culture differentially responds to nutrient availability and proportions (Prieto et al., 2005;Huerlimann et al., 2010).Nutrient contents also fluctuate based on the developmental phase, where, for example, a typical culture under standard conditions contains 30-40% protein, 10-20% lipids, and 5-15% carbohydrates at the end of the logarithmic phase.In the stationary phase, when nitrates are limited, storage products such as carbohydrates and lipids can double (Roncarati et al., 2004).
When selecting a microalgae species as a source of nutrients, the lipid profile should be analyzed.It is also necessary to determine the fatty acid (FA) profile (Renaud, 1994;Huerlimann et al., 2010;Tocher, 2015).Since in the last years special interest in the nutritional balance contributed by the FA has arisen (Tocher, 2015) it is important to know the lipid profile.The FA composition is species-specific and is a relevant criterion in nutrition (Roncarati et al., 2004).Particularly, it is important for diets containing marine organisms to contain highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs), especially EPA (C20:5n3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6n3) (Delaporte et al., 2005).
Currently, microalgae constitute a primary source of HUFAs (Hinzpeter et al., 2006), with EPA being one of the most studied due to its wellknown effects on the cardiovascular system of organisms, where, in humans, EPA effectively acts against cancer, coronary cardiomyopathology, schizophrenia, and rheumatoid arthritis (Ward and Singh, 2005;Hinzpeter et al., 2006;Conceição et al., 2010;Tocher, 2015).EPA may decrease muscle waste, can reduce inflammation and has the potential to modulate nutritional status/body composition.Marine fatty acids such as EPA and DHA inhibit leukotriene-mediated inflammation which leads to atherosclerosis in subpopulations with increased risk (Simopoulos, 2006).
The marine microalgae culture, like diatoms, could offer the ideal long-term, sustainable solution for EPA demand (Tocher, 2015).A variety of strategies has been devised to enhance the production of EPA and many authors have investigated processes for the increased production of EPA by diatom algae.The intensive production of FA would require algae to simultaneously demonstrate high growth and high proportions of EPA and DHA.These can be almost exclusive traits as lipid deposition is often associated with conditions when growth is limited (e.g.Nitrogen limitation, in stationary phase) (Tocher, 2015).Nitzschia alba and N. laevis have been studied because of the large EPA levels produced by these microorganisms (Ben-Amotz et al., 1985;Ward and Singh, 2005).
Considering the importance of microalgae nutritional contents, the aim of the present study was to characterize the growth and nutritional composition of two Bacillariophyceae diatoms obtained from the Pacific coast of Costa Rica.These diatoms were Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp., which are often considered candidates for obtaining essential marine HUFAs.

Algae cultures and growth rates
Two marine microalgae were selected from the strain database managed by the Center of Marine Biology (EBM) of the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.These strains were originally isolated off the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica, and classified as belonging to the Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp.(Rodríguez-Núñez et al., 2016).
The doubling time was determined by the three repetitions used for each volume, with 1 mL samples taken every 12 h and fixed with 1% Lugol's iodine solution.A haemocytometer was used to perform at least four cell counts per sample.Once the doubling time for the 150 mL culture was obtained, the end-point of logarithmic growth was determined to inoculate the 1500 mL culture and, likewise, the 8000 mL culture.

Characterization of cultures and statistics
From the microalgae cultured, growth rate (K), culture productivity (P), and the accumulated media (in terms of cells per mL -1 ) were determined.For all volumes used in this study K and P (in logarithmic phase) were used to characterize the culture using the following formulas: K = (lnC f -lnC i )•(t f -t i ) -1 and P = (C f -C i )•(t f -t i ) -1 , where C i : initial concentration, C f : final concentration of the exponential phase, and t f -t i : duration of the exponential phase in days (Levasseur et al., 1993).
Normal data distribution was confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors Normality Tests, following the methodology proposed by Bhujel (2009).To determine the endpoint for each culture phase (growth curve) the P values were used.A one-way analysis of variance was applied, using time as a variable.For the statistical analyses, the STATISTICA v7.0.61.0 software (Statsoft, Inc.) and Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation) were used.

Determination of chemical composition
Both strains were cultured in 10000 mL bottles filled with 8000 mL of f/2 culture medium.The nutritional composition was evaluated during two phases of the growth curve, with 12 repetitions during the logarithmic phase and 8 during the stationary phase.It was necessary to harvest 12 and 8 replicas for strain for biochemical analyzes of logarithmic and stationary phase.The harvesting points were previously defined in assays determining doubling time.Three samples of 1 mL were taken every 24 h and when harvesting the entire biomass.For observing the system conditions, culture samples were taken.
The harvested biomass was centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm (Model U-320R, Boeco, Germany).The obtained sample was maintained at -20 °C.The total harvest was mixed and lyophilized (Ilshin FD-8505, Korea); except 5 g of biomass, which were used to determine moisture (%).To obtain the biomass of each strain the moisture value was used.The following lyophilized biomass characteristics were determined in triplicate: moisture, ash, crude protein, total lipids and fiber contents; and fatty acid profile.
The logarithmic and stationary phases of both strains were compared.The data obtained for total lipid, crude protein, biomass moisture, EPA and DHA levels were compared using the Student's t-test for the two samples (Bhujel, 2009).

Microalgae growth rates and characterizations
The culture acclimation time was 1-2.5 d for all volumes of Nitzschia sp.used (Figure 1) and 12 h and 2 d for all volumes of Chaetoceros sp.used (Figure 2).The end of the exponential phase in 8000 mL volume was 3.5 d for both microalgae species.The highest value of P was obtained in 150 mL volumes for both species (Table 1).

Microalgae nutritional compositions
Nitzschia sp.presented approximately 10% more biomass than Chaetoceros sp.(Table 2).Significant differences in moisture were found between the logarithmic and stationary phases for both Nitzschia sp.(P = 0.009) and Chaetoceros sp.(P = 0.004).Likewise, significant differences were found when comparing the logarithmic (P < 0.001) and stationary (P < 0.001) phases between strains.
The main biochemical component of Nitzschia sp. was protein in the logarithmic and stationary phases.Chaetoceros sp.evidenced elevated protein levels in the logarithmic phase and the main biochemical component of the stationary phase was ash content (Table 2).For both strains, ash contents were higher in the logarithmic phase.Significant differences were also recorded between the logarithmic and stationary phases (P < 0.001) of Chaetoceros sp.For both strains, fiber values were not detected in the two culture phases.
For both strains, crude protein contents were higher than total lipid contents in the logarithmic phase.Comparing the logarithmic and stationary phases, significant differences were found for Nitzschia sp.(P < 0.001) and Chaetoceros sp.(P < 0.001).Significant differences were also recorded between strains when comparing the logarithmic (P < 0.001) and stationary phases (P < 0.001).Regarding total lipid contents, the logarithmic and stationary phase comparisons showed significant differences for Nitzschia sp.(P < 0.001) and Chaetoceros sp.(P < 0.001).The strain comparisons evidenced differences between the logarithmic (P = 0.009) and the stationary phases (P < 0.001).
According to the obtained FA profiles, both strains contained C14:0, C16:0, C16:1, and EPA as the principle FAs (Table 3).In the logarithmic phase of Nitzschia sp., PUFAs represented the majority of the lipid contents, while SFAs were the least represented.In the stationary phase of Nitzschia sp., MUFAs were the principal component, followed by PUFAs.In contrast, both phases of Chaetoceros sp.evidenced SFAs as the principal component, with PUFAs as the least represented.Significant differences were obtained when comparing the EPA levels between the logarithmic and stationary phases of Nitzschia sp.(P < 0.001) and Chaetoceros sp.(P = 0.03).In turn, no significant differences were found between Chaetoceros sp.culture phases for DHA levels (P = 0.49).

DISCUSSION
Biomass and lipid productivity are critical parameters in selecting micro-algal species for scale-up production and nutritional applications.The lipid content refers to quantitative and qualitative lipid composition (Conceição et al., 2010;Huerlimann et al., 2010).Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp.evidenced short acclimation periods during scaling compared to other diatoms (Prieto et al., 2005).Due to this short period, the desired biomass can be reached in less time, in addition to reducing the risks of improper management.Furthermore, both microalgae species of this study were sufficiently supported in the culture conditions.In terms of productivity, this result is particularly important.Notably, the significantly different growth rates of the three evaluated volumes for both strains are data which could be used to optimize the resource volumes used for scaling.Therefore, the tolerance and rate of adaptation to environmental variation are factors that should be considered when selecting microalgae species for culturing and biomass production (Conceição et al., 2010).
Another characteristic used to evaluate microalgae potential is growth rate in terms of cell count or biomass.Ideally, microalgae should have a short lifecycle which is reproducible under controlled conditions (Araújo and García, 2005;Conceição et al., 2010).Comparisons were made between traditionally cultured microalgae and the currently evaluated strains.Knuckey et al. (2002, p. 260) evaluated Nitzschia cf paleacea and the Isochrysis aff.galbana clone T-ISO in a volume of 1600 mL, and obtained growth rates of 0.55 and 0.56, respectively.These values are very similar to those obtained for the Nitzschia sp. of this study.V: culture volume (mL), F: end of exponential phase (days), D: final density of exponential phase (cells mL -1 ) with standard deviation, K: rate growth, P: productivity (cells mL -1 ), P: significance between P values.In contrast, the growth rates obtained by Renaud et al. (2002, p. 197) for Chaetoceros sp.(K= 0.74) were superior to those obtained in this research.Knuckey et al. (2002, p. 260) also obtained higher values of K for other diatoms.Although the Chaetoceros sp. of this study presents a short culture acclimation time, its growth rate was inferior to other diatoms traditionally cultivated.That may be due the fact that this rate varies among species (Abou-Shanab et al., 2011).
The produced biomass should have appropriate nutritional contents.These contents can vary depending on strain and the phase in which the culture is harvested.In algal cultures, crude protein is the primary organic constituent during the logarithmic growth phase, with contents decreasing during the stationary phase as a consequence of decreased nitrogenous compounds in the medium.This situation occurs in batch culture, like the one used in this research.In continuous or semi-continuous culture this effect is partially counteracted by adding nutrients (Medina-Reyna and Cordero-Esquivel, 1998;Araújo and García, 2005;Tocher, 2015).This was observed in the present results for biochemical analyses.Renaud et al. (1994, p. 342) isolated tropical species from northern Australia, including marine diatoms that were cultivated under controlled conditions similar to those used in the current study.Comparisons between the protein contents of the Nitzschia frustulum in Nitzschia sp. of this study showed that it has higher protein levels than either of the previously assessed diatoms.Rivero-Rodríguez et al. (2007) assessed the biochemical compositions of five marine microalgae, including Chaetoceroscalcitrans.The crude protein content of Chaetoceros sp. in this study was 6% less than C. calcitrans.
Ash represents a large portion of the biochemical composition in diatoms, as occurs in the microalgae species of this study.This is mainly found in the Chaetoceros genus, due to the formation and constitution of the frustula.The strains showed a significant difference when comparing the percentage of ash in exponential and stationary phases.A higher value in the logarithmic stage may be due to a thicker frustula in the early stages of the culture (Medina-Reyna and Cordero-Esquivel, 1998;Pacheco-Vega and Sánchez-Saavedra, 2009).Many microalgae species present changes in lipid content during the different phases of growth (Huerlimann et al., 2010;Su et al., 2013).Lipid content generally increases during the stationary phase as photosynthetic energy of the culture is diverted from cell division to lipid production, which is often triggered by limitations of nitrogen (Ben-Amotz et al., 1985;Huerlimann et al., 2010;Su et al., 2013).This behavior was found for the two presently studied strains, where Nitzschia sp.presented an increased total lipid content of 9.95% and Chaetoceros sp.Of 4.5%.The Nitzschia genus is known for high lipid contents that can surpass even 40% (Ben-Amotz et al., 1985).In comparing the total lipid contents of the Nitzschia sp. of this study, with the values obtained by Renaud et al. (1994, p. 341), the levels of Nitzschia sp. were 2.41% greater than previously reported.Likewise, the lipid contents of Chaetoceros sp.in the logarithmic phase were 7.9% higher than values reported by Rivero-Rodríguez et al. (2007), in addition to presenting values superior to those in other studies (Renaud et al., 2002;Delaporte et al., 2005;Pacheco-Vega and Sánchez-Saavedra, 2009).
As with lipids contents, the FA profile varies considerably between the different species or strainspecific (Hu et al., 2008;Huerlimann et al., 2010).However, in general terms for marine microalgae, PUFAs constitute most of the FA profile (Ben-Amotz et al., 1985;Hu et al., 2008), as evidenced by the Nitzschia sp. of this research.Moreover, the dominant FAs in both strains coincided with tendencies reported in the literature, specifically the C14:0, C16:0, C16:1, and EPA (Renaud et al., 1994;Su et al., 2013), values found in diatoms (Hu et al., 2008).Roncarati et al. (2004, p. 406) assessed four algal strains and confirmed that the FA profiles presented differences in the same strain depending on the culturing phase.The results for Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp. of this work coincided with prior findings by Su et al. (2013), in a study in which C16:1 FA content increased during logarithmic growth while EPA levels decreased.In the Nitzschia sp. of this study, C18:1 FA levels increased during the stationary stage, which could coincide with triacylglycerols acting as storage fats in algae, due to which, levels are generally low during the logarithmic phase (Ben-Amotz et al., 1985;Su et al., 2013).
Just as with diatoms previously studied, Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp.present high levels of EPA and low DHA levels (Delaporte et al., 2005;Hinzpeter et al., 2006;Rivero-Rodríguez et al., 2007;Conceição et al., 2010).EPA plays an important role in the prevention of arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease and cancer (Simopoulos, 2006).It is important to know that EPA and/or DHA are necessary for the animal and human population (Roncarati et al., 2004), and it is fundamental to study new sources of EPA and evaluate their potential, such as marine diatoms (Tocher, 2015), like the Nitzschia genus.Results of studies in Nitzschia reported high EPA levels (Conceição et al., 2010).When compared to values obtained in previous studies, the Nitzschia sp. of this research presented up to 16.8% more EPA (Renaud et al., 1994;Su et al., 2013).High EPA levels are very important and are associated with the production of PUFAs.
The lipid contents of Chaetoceros sp. of this study were similar or greater than other studies on the genus Chaetoceros (Renaud et al., 1994;Pacheco-Vega and Sánchez-Saavedra, 2009).The obtained EPA and DHA values were lower in both phases when compared to the values obtained for C. muelleri (13.44%EPA and 6.86% DHA, Pacheco-Vega and Sánchez-Saavedra, 2009) and C. calcitrans reported in other investigations (17.80%EPA and 1.30% DHA, Delaporte et al., 2005).According to Ryckebosch et al., (2012, p. 130) for the genus Chaetoceros, EPA levels should be between 8 and 22%, while DHA levels should be between 0.03 and 5%.This may be due to the fact that lipid and FA levels are strain-specific, and these concentrations may present differences between the two species of the same genus (Roncarati et al., 2004;Huerlimann et al., 2010).
The performed assessments support the conclusion that microalgae behavior and biochemical composition are specific to each strain.Although the evaluated strains were cultured under identical conditions, significant differences were found in growth, productivity, biochemical composition, lipid levels and FA profile between strains and between developmental phases of the same strain.

CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the culture characteristics and nutritional compositions of the studied strains support further consideration of these diatoms for nutritional applications in the Central American region.Nitzschia sp.presented approximately 10% more biomass than Chaetoceros sp., in addition to greater growth, higher productivity, and higher levels of protein, lipid, and EPA contents.Due to this, Nitzschia sp. is suggested as an option as a source of essential FA and EPA for animal and human nutrition.This study provides an initial foundation for further research, providing key information for the development of regional microalgae cultures.

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.Nitzschia sp.growth kinetics when cultured with three volumes of the f/2 medium.

Table 1 .
Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp.density, growth rate, and productivity in three culture volumes

Table 2 .
Chemical composition and moisture content and of Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp., biochemical compounds expressed as percentages of dry weight, during the logarithmic and stationary phases (mean ± standard deviation, n = 3) L: logarithmic phase, S: stationary phase, nd: undetected, ** Indicates significant differences between values of different phases between strain and the same phase between different strains using Student's t-test.

Table 3 .
Fatty acid composition, expressed as percentages of total fatty acids, of Nitzschia sp. and Chaetoceros sp.during the logarithmic and stationary phases (mean ± standard deviation, n = 2)