Production, characterization and anticancer activity of Candida bombicola sophorolipids by means of solid state fermentation of sunflower oil cake and soybean oil

M.M. Rashad*, M.U. Nooman, M.M. Ali, A.S. Al-kashef and A.E. Mahmoud

Biochemistry Department, Division of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding author: monarashad122@hotmail.com

 

SUMMARY

The production of sophorolipids by Candida bombicola NRRL Y- 17069 grown in a mixture of sunflower oil cake and crude soybean oil as economic substrates with different fermentation techniques was studied. The highest yield (49.5 g·100 g−1 substrates) was obtained from solid state fermentation after employing a new concept for extraction by methanol (E I) followed by ethyl acetate (E II), then partially purified with hexane (E III). The course of time of fermentation was also studied, and E I extracted of the 12th day showed the minimum surface tension (45 mN·m−1) at a critical micelle dilution (CMD) of 10% concentration. The produced sophorolipids were characterized and confirmed by FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopy. The anticancer activity of the produced compounds was assessed against MCF-7, HepG2, A549, HCT116 cancer cell lines and the results revealed that E III and E IV (a mixture of E I & E III) act as promising anticancer agents in HepG2 and A549 by inhibiting urokinase and histone deacetylase activities.

 

RESUMEN

Producción, caracterización y actividad anticancerígena de soforolípidos producidos mediante fermentación en estado sólido con Candida bombicola de tortas de girasol y aceite de soja. Se estudió la producción de soforolípidos por Candida bombicola NRRL Y- 17069 cultiva con diferentes técnicas de fermentación en una mezcla de torta de girasol y aceite de soja crudo, como sustratos económicos. El rendimiento más alto (49,5 g·100 g−1 de sustrato) se obtuvo por fermentación en estado sólido después de extraer con metanol (IE) seguido de acetato de etilo (EII), y de purificación parcial con hexano (EIII). También se estudió el tiempo de fermentación, considerando que el extracto IE de 12 días mostró una tensión superficial mínima (45 mN·m−1) a una dilución micelar crítica (CMD) de concentración 10%. Los soforolípidos producidos se caracterizaron y se confirmaron mediante espectroscopia FTIR y RMN de 1H. La actividad anticancerígena de los compuestos producidos se evaluó en células MCF-7, HepG2, A549, líneas celulares de cáncer de HCT116 y los resultados revelaron que EIII y EIV (una mezcla de EI y EIII) actúan como prometedores agentes anticancerígenos en HepG2 y A549 inhibiendo las actividades de uroquinasa e histona desacetilasa.

 

Submitted: 26 September 2013; Accepted: 10 December 2013

Citation/Cómo citar este artículo: Rashad MM, Nooman MU, Ali MM, Al-kashef AS, Mahmoud AE. 2014. Production, characterization and anticancer activity of Candida bombicola sophorolipids by means of solid state fermentation of sunflower oil cake and soybean oil. Grasas Aceites 65 (2): e017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/gya.098413.

KEYWORDS: Anticancer activity; Candida bombicola; Solid state fermentation; Sophorolipids; Soybean oil; Sunflower oilcake

PALABRAS CLAVE: Aceite de soja; Actividad anticancerígena; Candida bombicola; Fermentación en estado sólido; Soforolípidos; Torta de girasol

Copyright: © 2014 CSIC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial (by-nc) Spain 3.0 Licence.


 

CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTIONTOP

Biosurfactants are surface-active compounds produced by microorganisms. Most microbial surfactants are complex molecules, comprising of different structures which include lipopeptides, glycolipids, polysaccharide-protein complex, fatty acids and phospholipids (Nitschke and Pastore, 2006). Sophorolipids (SLs), a kind of extracellular biosurfactants, which are produced by yeasts, have been known for a long time, and each of them is comprised of one sophorose molecule, a hydrophilic part, linked to one hydroxyl fatty acid, a lipophilic part by one or two crosslines (Cavalero and Cooper, 2003).

A select number of yeast species, such as Candida apicola (Gorin et al., 1961), Candida bogoriensis (Tulloch et al., 1968), Wickerhamiella domercqiae (Chen et al. 2006a), Pichia anomala (Thaniyavarn et al., 2008), Candida guilliermondii (Sitohy et al., 2010), and Candida bombicola (Spencer et al. 1970, Daverey and Pakshirajan, 2009, Parekh et al., 2012) etc., were reported to produce extracellular bio- surfactant as SLs.

It is well known that the cost of raw materials generally contributes up to 75% of the selling price of bio-products. Hence, in order to compete with a cheaper chemical surfactant, it is important to use a suitable low-cost fermentation media for the production of SLs. In other words, biosurfactants can replace synthetic ones, which may result in main taining the cost of the raw materials in its production process at a minimum (Daverey and Pakshirajan, 2009).

Several renewable substrates from various sources, particularly from well-known industrial wastes have been intensively studied for microorganism cultivation and biosurfactant production on a laboratory scale (Daniel et al., 1998; Solaiman et al., 2004; Felse et al., 2007; Thavasi et al., 2008; Sitohy et al., 2010; Parekh et al., 2012).

Worldwide production of oils and fats is about 2.5–3 million tons, 75% of which is derived from plants (Haba et al., 2000), which generates great quantities of waste called oil cakes. Annual growth in oil cake production was projected to average 2.3% over the decade to 2010 (Ramachandran et al., 2007). Their applications in the field of fermentation technology have resulted in the production of bulk-chemicals and value-added products. (Pandey et al., 1999; Vandenberghe et al., 2000; Nampoothiri et al., 2002; Soccol et al., 2005; Roopesh et al., 2006; Rashad et al., 2012).

In recent years, SLs have attracted much attention for their applications due to their good surface activity, biodegradability, biocompatibility, low toxicity, production process under mild conditions, and production from renewable materials (Lee et al., 2008). Also, SLs have attracted more attention since they were found to have good anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and even anti-HIV activities, which will broaden their applications in the pharmaceutical sector (Shah et al., 2005; Yoo et al., 2005; Napolitano 2006). Natural SL molecules and their specific derivatives have recently been reported to have anticancer effects against liver, leukemia, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer cells (Chen et al., 2006b; Fu et al., 2008, Shao et al., 2012). However, little is known about the pharmacological roles of SLs as anticancer drugs. Although there have been great advances in the detection and treatment of cancer, it remains one of the greatest medical challenges. Therefore, the need for better treatments has stimulated research to develop new efficient chemotherapeutic agents for the management of cancer. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease that functions in the conversion of the circulating plasminogen to the active serine protease plasmin. uPA is involved in many physiological functions and it has been implicated in cancer invasion and metastatization (Bdeir et al., 2003; Duffy and Duggan, 2004). In addition, Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are a class of enzymes which play an important role in gene expression (Hu et al., 2000). Because it has been reported that its inhibition brought about cell-cycle arrest and induced differentiation (Komatsu and Hayashi, 1998), HDAC is considered a target for new types of pharmaceuticals. A possible application of HDAC inhibitors would be the treatment of cancer (Komatsu et al., 2001).

Therefore, the objective of the present work was to investigate the production and properties of SLs from Candida bombicola cultivated in a mixture of sunflower oil cake and crude soybean oil as alternative unconventional substrates and also, to explore a possible application of the produced SLs in the pharmaceutical field as anticancer agents by studying their in vitro cytotoxicity and anti-proliferative activity on four human cell lines.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODSTOP

2.1. Yeast strainTOP

Candida bombicola NRRL Y-17069 was obtained from the Agricultural Research Service, Peoria, Illinois, USA. The culture was kept in a stock slant medium (Wickerman, 1951).

2.2. SubstratesTOP

Sunflower seeds (Giza 1) were obtained from the local market (Cairo, Egypt). The seeds were pressed with laboratory-type Carver hydraulic press under 10.000 Ib in−2 pressure for 1 h at room temperature according to Üstun et al. (1990), then the sunflower oil cake residue was collected, frozen and kept at −4 °C until analysis. Crude soybean oil was obtained from the Food Technology Research Institute, Soy Processing Center, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt. All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

2.3. Inoculum preparationTOP

The inoculum was prepared by transferring a loopful of a stock culture (7 days old) of C. bombicola to a 50 ml sterile inoculum medium (Wickerman, 1951), which was then incubated at 30 °C, 180 rpm for 24h.

2.4. Cultivation conditionsTOP

2.4.1. Submerged fermentation (medium I)TOP

An aliquot of 1 mL of the inoculum with cell density (1×108 cells mL−1) was transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask (250 ml) containing 50 mL of the medium (modified from kim et al., 1999) consisting of (g·L−1) sunflower oil cake waste, 50; soybean oil, 50; NH4NO3 1.0; K2HPO4, 2.55; NaH2PO4, 0.15; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.5; CaCl2.2H2O, 0.1; MnSO4.H2O, 0.02; peptone, 1.0. The final pH was 7.8 and the mixture was incubated for 96 h, at 180 rpm in a controlled incubator shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, USA) at 30 °C.

2.4.2. Submerged fermentation (medium II)TOP

This was done as described above for medium I but without the addition of soybean oil.

2.4.3. Solid state fermentation (medium III)TOP

The solid state fermentation (SSF) medium was prepared according to the method of Ohno et al. (1995) with some modifications as follows: 1 mL of the overnight culture was mixed for seeding thoroughly with 5 g of sunflower oil cake waste, 5 g of soybean oil and 4 mL of previously mentioned nutrients (mediumI). Then, the cultures were grown for 96 h in a static incubator at 30 °C.

2.5. Extraction of SophorolipidsTOP

2.5.1. Extraction from submerged medium (media I and II)TOP

The crude SL was isolated from the submerged medium according to kim et al. (1999). The fermented product was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 15 min. and the supernatant was then twice extracted using 2 volumes of ethyl acetate. The extracts were collected and treated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, then the ethyl acetate was evaporated by rotary evaporator and the residue was collected.

2.5.2. Extraction from solid mediumTOP

a. Methanol Extraction

As for SSF, the crude SL was isolated according to Ohno et al. (1995) by adding 45ml of methanol to one volume of the solid media and the mixture was shaken at 92 strokes min−1 for 60 min with a reciprocal shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, USA). The crude extract was then filtered through a 0.20 μm membrane filter (GELMAN sciences, USA), to obtain the methanol extract (E I) (Roongswang et al., 2002).

b. Re-extraction by ethyl acetate

A modification was made by re-extracting the fermented substrates (after isolation of EI) with 45mL of ethyl acetate and shaking at 92 strokes min−1 for 60 min with a reciprocal shaker, filtered through a 0.20 μm membrane filter to obtain the second ethyl acetate extract (E II). The crude SL was further purified according to Hu and Ju (2001) as follows: the previously obtained ethyl acetate extract (E II) was vacuum-dried at 40 °C to remove the solvent. The residue was twice washed with 10ml hexane to remove any remaining soybean oil, and probably some hydrophobic substances such as fatty acids and alcohols formed in the fermentation. Partially purified SL extract (E III) was thus obtained after vaporizing the residual hexane at 40 °C under vacuum.

2.6. Characterization of SophorolipidsTOP

Surface tension and critical micelle dilution (CMD) were determined with Du-Nouy tensiometer (Kruss type 8451). CMD is defined as the reciprocal of the SL dilution at which a sharp increase in surface tension is observed. To determine the CMD, different serial dilutions were done for the SL extracts (EI, EII, and EIII) obtained from C. bombicola (McInerney et al., 2004).

2.7. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)TOP

The infrared (IR) spectrum (from 400 to 4000 wave numbers, cm−1) of SL extracts were recorded using a KBr pellet in Nicolet Impact 6100 FTIR spectrophotometer JASCO, USA.

2.8. NMR spectra analysisTOP

The NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury VX-300 NMR spectrometer. 1H spectra were run at 300 MHz in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3). Chemical shifts are quoted in δ and were related to those of the solvents.

2.9. Cell lines and culturingTOP

Anticancer activity screening for the tested compounds with 4 different human tumor cell lines including breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7; hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, lung cancer A549 and colon cancer HCT116 which were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The tumor cells were kept in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum (GIBCO), penicillin (100 U·mL−1) and streptomycin (100 μg·mL−1) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells at a concentration of 0.50×106 were grown in a 25 cm2 flask in 5 mL of a complete culture medium.

2.10. In vitro Anti-proliferative AssayTOP

The anti-proliferative activity was measured in vitro using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay according to the previously reported standard procedure (Mosmann 1983). The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader (AsysHitech, Austria) at 570 nm. The relationship between surviving fraction and compound concentration was plotted to get the survival curve for each cell line after the specified time. The concentration required for 50% inhibition of cell viability (IC50) was calculated.

2.11. Determination of the level of uPA protein expressionTOP

The level of urokinase (uPA) protein expression was determined using AssayMax human uPA ELISA kit (Assaypro, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The prepared compounds as well as a standard drug, doxorubicin were incubated for 48 h with, HepG2 and A549 cells at a concentration of 1/10 of the IC50 values of each compound.

2.12. Determination of Histone deacetylase (HDAC) activityTOP

Histone deacetylase inhibitors represent a promising new class of compounds for the treatment of cancer (Walkinshaw and Yang, 2008). The activity of HDAC in the lysate of hepatic HepG2 and lung A549 cancer cells treated with the prepared compounds was measured using a colorimetric assay kit (BioVision, Mountain View, kit no. K331-100).

2.13. Statistical analysisTOP

The results are reported as Mean±Standard error (S.E.) for experiments repeated at least four times. Statistical differences were analyzed according to the one way ANOVA test followed by the student’s t test wherein the differences were considered to be significant at p<0.05.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSTOP

3.1. Sophorolipid productionTOP

Utilization of a local waste for a maximum production of crude biosurfactant with low cost production materials and processing was the main purpose of this work. Different fermentation techniques were used in this study. By using a submerged medium (medium I), the crude SL obtained reached the level of 20.6 g·100 g−1 substrate by extraction with ethyl acetate from the substrates (sunflower oil cake plus soybean oil) on the fourth day of fermentation (Figure 1). While a non-significant amount of SL was produced from the same medium without soybean oil (medium II). The yield obtained from the medium I (41.2 g·L−1) was higher than that of Davery and Pakshirajan (2010), who found that the maximum yield of C. bombicola SL ranged from 23.3 to 33.3 g·L−1 using mixed hydrophilic substrates. Also, it was higher than that obtained by Parekh et al. (2012) (5.8 g·100 g−1 substrate) using C. Starmerella grown in submerged media containing various lipids and fatty acids obtained from mango kernel. On the other hand, the present yield was slightly lower than that produced by Li et al. 2013 (47 g·L−1) and Sudha et al., 2010 (49.8 g·L−1) using Wickerhamiella domercqiae var. and C. tropicalis respectively. By using SSF for the same substrates, which consists of sunflower oil cake plus soybean oil (medium III), different extraction methods were examined in one step extraction. Using methanol as extraction solvent, the extract (E I) gave a yield of SL 17 g·100 g−1 substrate, while the extraction by ethyl acetate gave a yield of 22 g·100 g−1 substrate. However, using a mixture of methanol and ethyl acetate at a ratio of 1:1 (in one step extraction), the yield was 15 g·100 g−1 substrate.

Figure 1. The yield of sophorolipids from different fermentation techniques and different solvents on the 4th day of fermentation (data were expressed as mean±S.E. of 4 experiments).

 

On the other hand, employing a new concept for the production process by re-extraction of the remaining fermented media (after isolation of EI) with ethyl acetate (E II) resulted in a higher additional amount of the produced SL (32.5 g·100 g−1) as shown in Figure 1. This new method of re-extraction produced a higher yield of SL than the traditional extraction method for the solid medium using methanol alone, whereas the two extracts (E I and E II) produced a level of 49.5 g·100 g−1 for the same substrates on the fourth day of fermentation.

Parekh et al. (2012) found that the SL obtained from C. Starmerella with SSF of mango kernel was 17.48 g·100 g−1 substrate after extraction by ethyl acetate, which was lower than our results for ethyl acetate extraction alone (22 g·100 g−1 substrate). On the other hand, the total yields obtained in this study from methanol extract EI (17 g·100 g−1 substrate) and ethyl acetate re-extract EII (32.5 g·100 g−1 substrate) were significantly higher (49.5 g·100 g−1 substrate).

The highest yield obtained from medium III using our modified re-extraction method was confirmed to be the most suitable extraction method used. From all the above results, it can be concluded that the SSF technique is a suitable technique for further studies with the two steps of extraction.

The course of time of SL production during the SSF (medium III) using the modified extraction method investigated in this study is presented in Figure 2. It can be observed that the methanol extract (E I) productivity was directly proportional with incubation time, whereas the higher yield of SL was obtained on the 16th and 12th days, giving 28.75 and 28.11 g·100 g−1 substrate, respectively; while, lower yields were achieved on the 4th and 8th days of incubation (17 and 20.52 g·100 g−1 substrate, respectively). However, the ethyl acetate re-extract (E II) productivity was inversely proportional with incubation time, where the higher SL yield was obtained on the 4th and 8th days (32.5 and 22.13 g·100 g−1 substrate, respectively); subsequently the lower yield was produced on the16th and 12th days of fermentation (10.5 and 12.8 g·100 g−1 substrate, respectively). The highest yield obtained from both extracts over the course of fermentation time was 49.5 g·100 g−1 substrate on the 4th day, while the lowest was 39.25 g·100 g−1 substrate on the 16th day of incubation.

Figure 2. The course of time of sophorolipid production during solid state fermentation (medium III) using the modified extraction method investigated (data were expressed as mean±S.E. of 4 experiments).

 

3.2. Identification and characterization of sophorolipidsTOP

One of the important characterization properties of a potent surfactant is its ability to lower the surface tension in aqueous solutions. CMD is an indirect indication of surfactant concentration (Makkar and Cameotra, 1997). So, the surface tension (S.T.) and critical micelle dilution (CMD) were determined to evaluate the surface activity of the produced SL resulting from both solvents (E I and E II) during the fermentation period. It was found that the SL extracted with methanol (E I) on the 12th day showed the highest efficiency in reducing the surface tension of water from 70 to 45 mN·m−1 when the sample was diluted to 0.1X (10% concentration) which corresponds to its CMD, followed by the ethyl acetate extract (E II) on the same day which gave 48 mN·m−1 at the same dilution (0.1X) of 10% concentration CMD. This ethyl acetate extract (E II) was partially purified by hexane to produce the E III extract, which was found to have a non-significant effect on reducing the surface tension (47 mN·m−1) compared to the E II extract at the same CMD (Figure 3). However, the surface tension of the other SL extracts using both solvents during the fermentation period (4–16 days) ranged from 51–56 mN·m−1.

Figure 3. The surface tension and critical micelle dilution (CMD) of the produced sophorolipid extracted by methanol (E I), ethyl acetate (E II) and purified by hexane to form ethyl acetate extract (E III). The critical micelle dilutions (CMD) are marked in circles (data were expressed as mean±S.E. of 4 experiments).

 

In light of the above results, more studies will be done on the compounds (E I, E II and E III) on the 12th day of fermentation. These results of S.T. for E I & E II nearly coincide with those reported by Kim et al. (2005), in that the S.T. of C. bombic ola SL was 48 mN·m−1 when grown in a medium containing glucose and dark soybean oil as carbon sources. However, they were lower than those stated by Amaral et al. (2006), who found that the biosurfactant from Yarrowia lipolytica has the ability to reduce S.T. by up to 50 mN·m−1

On the other hand, the prepared SL exhibited a higher minimum S.T. than that produced from many candida species and ranged from 32–39 mN·m−1 (Sobrinho et al., 2008; Daverey and Pakshirajan 2009, 2010; Chandran and Das 2011).

3.3. FT-IR analysisTOP

The FT-IR spectra of the prepared SL compounds (E I, E II and E III) showed mostly identical absorption bands (Figure 4). The FT-IR spectra for all extracts revealed broad bands at 3385–3424 cm−1 which correspond to the O-H stretch, while asymmetrical stretching (vas CH2) and symmetrical stretching (vs CH2) of methylene occurs at 2926 cm−1 and 2855 cm−1 respectively. Absorption bands at (1742–1745 cm−1) contribute to C=O stretching from lactone ester or acids. The C=O absorption band from acetyl esters was observed at 1238–1240 cm−1 in all structures, while the bands at 1460 cm−1 corresponded to the C-O-H in the plane binding of carboxylic acid (-COOH) in the structure of the three products. The stretch of C-O band of C (-O)-O-C in lactones exists in all products at 1164–1170 cm−1, also the C-O stretch from C-O-H groups of sugar (sophorose moiety) is observed at 1080–1098 cm−1; finally the IR spectra revealed the absorption band for C=C at 719–723 cm−1 in all the studied structures. All these structural details of the products were found similar to those reported by Yongmei and Lu-Kwang (2001); Daverey and Pakshiragan (2009) and Bajaj et al. (2012), which confirmed that these products are SL compounds.

Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the produced sophorolipid compounds E I, E II and E III.

 

3.4. 1 H NMR analysisTOP

The structure of the produced SL compounds (E I, E II and E III) was elucidated using 1H NMR analysis. The spectra of the three extracts were assigned to a typical glycolipid-type structure. In all compounds, the signals of the vinyl group (–CH=CH–) were at 5.32≈5.39 ppm, while the signals at 2.08 ppm were denoting the presence of–CH3 group. Multiple peaks from 1.23 to 1.31 ppm put the accent on the existence of fatty acid chain moiety in all structures. The presence of the–CO-CH3 group in all structures was confirmed by the signals at 2.06 ppm in the spectra; on the other hand, the protons of two glucose were resonated at 3.4≈4.3 ppm in the Hexane fraction (E III). The signals obtained were similar to the one in the 1H NMR spectrum of the SL compounds reported by other researchers (Wei et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006a; Gao et al., 2007; Daverey and Pakshiragan 2009 and Bajaj et al., 2012).

According to the results of the FT-IR and 1H NMR analyses, all these structural features further confirmed the SL group of compounds (acidic and lactone ring form) in the produced biosurfactants.

3.5. In vitro anti-proliferative activityTOP

The anti-proliferative activity of the produced crude and partially purified SLs (E l, E II and E III) and a mixture of E I and E III (E IV) was evaluated against breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7; human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, human lung cancer A549 and human colon cancer HCT116 cell lines using an MTT colorimetric assay, in comparison with doxorubicin as reference drug. The results revealed that all compounds did not exert any activity against human breast cancer MCF-7 or colon cancer HCT116 cell lines.

The anti-proliferative activities are expressed by median growth inhibitory concentration (IC50) and provided in Table 1. From the results it is evident that the tested SLs compounds displayed potent growth inhibitory activity against only two tested cell lines (HepG2 and A549).

Table 1. Cytotoxicity (IC50, μg·mL–1) activity of the produced sophorolipid compounds (E I, E II, E III and E IV) against four human malignant cell lines as measured with the MTT assay method
Cell line
Compound HepG2 MCF-7 A549 HCT116
Doxorubicin 20.10±2.00 24.00±2.50 25.50±2.70 19.25±2.00
EI 47.00±4.20 NA 46.60±4.30 NA
EII 36.00±3.50 NA 41.20±4.60 NA
EIII 23.70±2.63 NA 29.00±2.80 NA
EIV 19.00±1.80 NA 25.77±2.20 NA
Data are expressed as means±S.E. of four separate experiments.
NA: no activity.

The IC50 of compounds E l, E II, E III and E IV for the HepG2 cell line was 47.00±4.20, 36.00±3.50, 23.70±2.63 and 19.00±1.80 μg·mL−1 respectively. It is clear that, while the IC50 of E III (23.70±2.63 μg·mL−1) is close to the value of the reference drug, doxorubicin (20.10±2.00 μg·mL−1), the mixture of the 2 extracts (E IV) was more potent (19.00±1.80 μg·mL−1) than the doxorubicin. Similarly, the IC50 of SL compounds E I, E II, E III and E IV for the A549 cell line was 46.60±4.30, 41.20±4.60, 29.00±2.80 and 25.77±2.20 μg·mL−1 respectively. It is clear that the mixture (E IV) was more potent (25.77±2.20 μg·mL−1) than doxorubicin (25.50±2.70 μg·mL−1).

3.6. The level of uPA protein expressionTOP

To identify the mechanism of action responsible for the cytotoxicity of the prepared SL compounds, the level of urokinase (uPA) protein expressed in the two cell lines (HepG2 and A549) were estimated quantitatively.

In the case of the hepatic cancer cell line HepG2 and lung cancer cell line A549, the SL compounds E I and E II have no effect on the expression of uPA, only 4 and 3% inhibition were obtained in HepG2, while 2% and 2% inhibition were obtained in A549 cells. On the other hand, the level of uPA expression decreased in SL compounds E III and E IV by the following percent, E III (65, 55%) and E IV (75, 63%) in HepG2 and A549, respectively. From the results, the sophorolipid compound E IV exhibited a good anticancer activity in HepG2 and A549 similar to doxorubicin (92% and 86%, respectively) (Figure 5). In both HepG2 and A549 the inhibition of uPA activity of the tested SLs compounds was in accordance with the cytotoxicity activity.

Figure 5. The percent of uPA inhibition of the produced sophorolipid compounds (E I, E II, E III and E IV) comparing to doxorubicin in HepG2 and A549 cell lines (data were expressed as mean±S.E. of 4 experiments).

 

3.7. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) activityTOP

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are a new class of targeted anticancer agents which are potent inducers of growth arrest, differentiation, and/or apoptotic cell death of transformed cells in vitro and in vivo (Bi and Jiang, 2006). Thereby, we examined the effect of the prepared SL compounds as histone deacetylase inhibitors in an attempt to use them in tumor treatment.

In this work the activity of HDAC in the lysate of hepatic HepG2 and lung A549 cancer cells treated with the prepared SL compounds as well as Trichostatin, as a known inhibitor, was measured and the data were calculated as percentage of inhibition as compared to the control, untreated cancer cells. While the treatment of hepatic HepG2 and lung A549 cancer cells with Trichostatin resulted in 60% and 48% inhibition, respectively, as compared with the control untreated cancer cells, the treatment with compounds E l, E II, E III and E IV resulted in 6, 8, 38 and 47%, respectively in hepatic HepG2 cells. Similarly, the treatment of lung A549 cells with all the prepared SL compounds (E I-E IV) resulted in the inhibition of the activity of HDAC by 3, 5, 32 and 39%, respectively (Figure 6).

Figure 6. The effect of the prepared sophorolipid compounds (E I, E II, E III and E IV) on HDAC activity in HepG2 and A549 cell lines after treatment with the prepared compounds and cells with Trichostatin, as a known HDAC inhibitor. The data was compared with the HDAC activity of the control cancer cells (data were expressed as mean±S.E. of 4 experiments).

 

Taken together, these findings suggest that there are correlations between the cytotoxicity of the tested SL compounds and inhibition of the urokinase and Histone deacetylase activities. The tested compounds exert anti-carcinogenic activity in hepatic HepG2 and lung A549 cancer cell lines by lowering the activity of these enzymes which may reduce the cell proliferation and result in significant growth inhibition. The potent anticancer effect of the compound E IV needs further investigation.

Chen et al. (2006b) studied the cytotoxic effects of the SL produced by the yeast Wickerhamiella domercqiae on cancer cells of liver, lung and leukemia (H7402, A549, HL60 andK562). The results showed a dose-dependent inhibition ratio on cell viability according to the drug concentration ≤62.5 μg·mL−1, which suggested that the SL produced by W. domercqiae have anticancer activity.

Fu et al. (2008) have demonstrated that acidic SL had stronger cytotoxicity (35.5% cytotoxicity at 100 mg mL concentration) than lactonic SL (26.2% cytotoxicity at 100 mg·mL−1 concentration) against pancreatic cancer cells and he reported that these different results are probably attributed to the inhibition mechanism of SL on pancreatic cancer cells, which are different from other cancer cells. Also, Shao et al. (2012) investigated the bioactivity of SLs with different structures against human esophageal cancer cells, and the results revealed that the SLs with different unsaturation degrees of hydroxyl fatty acids had different cytotoxic effects on esophageal cancer cells.

 

REFERENCESTOP


Amaral PF, Silva Da, Lehocky JM, Barros-Timmons M, Coelho AV, Marrucho MZ. 2006. Production and characterization of a bioemulsifier from Yarrowia lipolytica. Process Biochem. 41, 1894–1898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.03.029.
Bajaj V, Tilay A, Annapure U. 2012. Enhanced Production of Bioactive Sophorolipids by Starmerella bombicola NRRL Y-17069 by Design of Experiment Approach with Successive Purification and Characterization. J. Oleo Sci. 61, 377–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.5650/jos.61.377.
Bdeir K, Kuo A, Sachais BS. 2003.The kringle stabilizes urokinase binding to the urokinase receptor. Blood 102, 3600–3608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-03-0949.
Bi G, Jiang G. 2006. The molecular mechanism of HDAC inhibitors in anticancer effects. Cellular Mol. Immunol. 3, 285–290.
Cavalero DA, Cooper DG. 2003. The effect of medium composition on the structure and physical state of sophorolipids produced by Candida bombicola ATCC22214. J. Biotech. 103, 31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00067-1.
Chandran P. and Das N. 2011. Characterization of sophorolipid biosurfactant produced by yeast species grownon diesel oil. Internat. J. Sci. Nature 2, 63–71.
Chen J, Song X, Zhang H, Qu Y, Miao J. 2006a. Sophorolipid produced from the new yeast strain Wickerhamiell adomercqiae induces apoptosis in H7402 human liver cancer cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 72, 52–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0243-z.
Chen J, Song X, Zhang H, Qu Y. 2006b. Production, structure elucidation and anticancer properties of sophorolipid from Wickerhamiell adomercqiae. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 39, 501–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.12.022.
Daniel HJ, Otto RT, Reuss M, Syldatk C. 1998. Sophorolipid production with high yields on whey concentrate and rapeseed oil without consumption of lactose. Biotech. Letter 20, 805–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005332605003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000015927.29348.1a.
Daverey A, Pakshirajan K. 2009. Production, characterization, and properties of sophorolipids from the yeast Candida bombicola using a low-cost fermentative medium. Appl Biochem Biotech. 158, 663–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8449-z.
Daverey A, Pakshirajan K. 2010. Sophorolipids from Candida bombicola using mixed hydrophilic substrates: production, purification and characterization. Colloid Surface B 79, 246–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.002.
Duffy MJ, Duggan C. 2004. The urokinase plasminogen activator system: a rich source of tumour markers for the individualised management of patients with cancer. Clin. Biochem. 37, 541–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.013.
Felse PA, Shah V, Chan J, Rao KJ, Gross RA. 2007. Sophorolipid biosynthesis by Candida bombicola from industrial fatty acid residues. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 40, 316–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.04.013.
Fu SL, Wallner SR, Bowne WB, Hagler MD, Zenilman ME, Gross R, Bluth MH. 2008. Sophorolipids and their derivatives are lethal against human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Surg. Res. 148, 77–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.005.
Gao W, Hagver R, Shah V, Xie W, Gross RA, Ilker MF, Bell C, Burke KA, Coughlin EB. 2007. Glycolipid polymer synthesized from natural lactonic sophorolipids by ring-opening metathesis polymerization. Macromolecules 40, 145–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma0620159.
Gorin PAJ, Spencer JFT, Tulloch AP. 1961. Hydroxy fatty acid glycosides of sophorose from Torulopsis magnoliae. Can. J. Chem. 39, 846–855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/v61-104.
Haba E, Espuny MJ, Busquets M, Manresa A. 2000. Screening and production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 47T2 NCIB 40044 from waste frying oils. J. Appl. Microb. 88, 379–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00961.x.
Hu Y, Ju L K. 2001. Purification of lactonic sophorolipids by crystallization. J. Biotechnol. 87, 263–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00248-6.
Hu E, Chen Z, Fredrickson T, Zhu Y, Kirkpatrick R, Zhang GF, Johanson K, Sung CM, Liu R, Winkler J. 2000. Cloning and characterization of a novel human class I histone deacetylase that functions as a transcription repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15254–15264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M908988199.
Kim HS, Kim YB, Lee BS, Kim EK. 2005. Sophorolipid production by Candida bombicola ATCC 22214 from a corn-oil processing byproduct. J. Microb. Biotech. 15, 55–58.
Kim HS, Yoon BD, Choung DH, Oh HM, Katsuragi T, Tani Y. 1999. Characterization of a biosurfactant, mannosyl erythritol lipid produced from Candida sp. SY16. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52, 713–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530051583.
Komatsu Y, Hayashi H. 1998. Histone deacetylase inhibitors up-regulate the expression of cell surface MHC class-I molecules in B16/BL6 cells. J. Antibiot. 51, 89–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.51.89.
Komatsu Y, Tomizaki K, Tsukamoto M, Kato T, Nishino N, Sato S, Yamori T, Tsuruo T, Furumai R, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, Hayashi H. 2001. Cyclichydroxamic-acid-containing peptide 31, a potent synthetic histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity. Cancer Res. 61, 4459–4466.
Lee YJ, Choi JK, Kim EK, Youn SH, Yang EJ. 2008. Field experiments on mitigation of harmful algal blooms using a sophorolipid–yellow clay mixture and effects on marine plankton. Harmful Algae 7, 154–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2007.06.004.
Li H, Ma X, Wang S, Song X. 2013. Production of sophorolipids with eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from Wickerhamiella domercqiae var. sophorolipid using fish oil as a hydrophobic carbon source. Biotechnol. Lett. 35, 901–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1151-4.
Makkar RS, Cameotra SS. 1997. Utilization of molasses for biosurfactant production by two Bacillus strains at thermophilic conditions. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 74, 887–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11746-997-0233-7.
McInerney MJ, Youssef N, Fincher T, Maudgalya SK, Folmsbee MJ, Knapp R, Nagle D. 2004. Development of Microorganisms with Improved Transport and Biosurfactant Activity for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Annual Report Department of Botany and Microbiology and Department of Petroleum Engineering University of Oklahoma. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/834168.
Mosmann T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.
Nampoothiri KM, Ramachandran S, Soccol CR, Pandey A. 2002. Advances in fermentation technology. Int. Sugar J. 104, 493–499.
Napolitano LM. 2006. Sophorolipids in sepsis: Anti-inflammatory or antibacterial? Crit. Care Med. 34, 258–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000196082.26483.F0.
Nitschke M, Pastore GM. 2006. Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 336–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.044.
Ohno A, Ano T, Shoda N. 1995. Production of a lipopeptide antibiotic, surfactin, by recombinant Bacillus subtilis in solid state fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 47, 209–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260470212.
Pandey A, Selvakumar P, Soccol CR, Nigam P. 1999. Solid state fermentation for the production of industrial enzymes. Curr. Sci. 77, 149–162.
Parekh VJ, Patravale VB, Pandit AB. 2012. Mango kernel fat: A novel lipid source for the fermentative production of sophorolipid biosurfactant using Starmerella Bombicola NRRL-Y 17069. Annals Biol. Res. 3, 1798–1803.
Ramachandran S, Singh SK, Larroche C, Soccol, CR, Pandey A. 2007. Oil cakes and their biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol. 98, 2000–2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.002.
Rashad MM, Mahmoud AE, Al-Kashef AS, Nooman MU. 2012. Purification and Characterization of Novel Fibrinolytic Enzyme by Candida guilliermondii Grown on Sunflower Oil Cake. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 8, 635–645.
Roongsawang N, Thaniyavarn J, Thaniyavarn S, Kameyama T, Haruki M, Imanaka T, Morikawa M, Kanaya S. 2002. Isolation and characterization of a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis BBK-1 which produces three kinds of lipopeptides: bacillomycin L, plipastatin, and surfactin. Extremophiles 6, 499–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-002-0287-2.
Roopesh K, Ramachandran S, Nampoothiri KM, Szakacs G, Pandey A. 2006. Comparison of phytase production on wheat bran and oil cakes in solid-state fermentation by Mucor racemosus. Bioresour Technol. 97, 506–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.046.
Shah V, Doncel GF, Seyoum T, Eaton KM, Zalenskaya I, Hagver R, Azim A, Gross R. 2005. Sophorolipids, microbial glycolipids with anti-human immunodeficiency virus and sperm-immobilizing activities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 4093–4100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.10.4093-4100.2005.
Shao L, Song X, Ma X, Li H, Qu Y. 2012. Bioactivities of Sophorolipid with Different Structures Against Human Esophageal Cancer Cells. J. Surg. Res. 173, 286–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.013.
Sitohy MZ, Rashad MM, Sharobeem SF, Abeer EM, Nooman MU, AlKashef AS. 2010. Bioconversion of soy processing waste for production of surfactants. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4, 2811– 2821.
Sobrinho HBS, Rufino RD, Luna JM, Salgueiro AA, Campos-Takaki GM, Leite LFC, Sarubbo LA. 2008. Utilization of two agroindustrial by products for the production of a surfactant by Candida sphaerica UCP0995. Process Biochem. 43, 912–917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.04.013.
Soccol CR, Brand D, Mohan R, Rodriguez JAL, Pandey A. 2005. Coffee husk: a potential alternative material for bioprocesses. Metals Mater Process 17, 195–206.
Solaiman DKY, Ashby RD, Nunez A, Foglia TA. 2004. Production of sophorolipids by Candida bombicola grown on soy molasses as substrate. Biotechnol. Lett. 26, 1241–1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000036605.80577.30.
Spencer JFT, Gorin PAJ, Tulloch AP. 1970. Torulopsis bombicola sp. n. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 36, 129–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02069014.
Sudha S, KumananR, Vijayashree P, Muthusamy K. 2010. Comparative study for the production, characterization and antimicrobial studies of sophorolipids using candida Tropicalis. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 3, 69–72.
Thaniyavarn J, Chianguthai T, Sangvanich P, Roongsawang N, Washio K, Morikawa M, Thaniyavarn S. 2008. Production of sophorolipid biosurfactant by Pichia anomala. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 72, 2061–2068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.80166.
Thavasi R, jayalakshmi S, Balasubramanian T, Banat IM. 2008. Production and characterization of a glycolipid biosurfactant from Bacillus megaterium using economically cheaper sources. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 917–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9609-y.
Tulloch AP, Spencer JFT, Deinema MH. 1968. A new hydroxy fatty acid sophoroside from Candida bogoriensis. Can. J. Chem. 46, 345–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/v68-057.
Üstun GL, Kent NC, Civelekoglu H. 1990. Investigation of the technological properties of Nigella sativa (Black cumin) seed oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67, 958–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02541857.
Vandenberghe LPS, Soccol CR, Pandey A, Lebeault JM. 2000. Solid-state fermentation for the synthesis of citric acid by Aspergillus niger. Bioresour Technol. 74, 175–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00107-8.
Walkinshaw DR, Yang XJ. 2008. Histone deacetylase inhibitors as novel anticancer therapeutics. Current Oncolog. 15, 237–243.
Wei YH, Chou CL, Chang JS. 2005. Rhamnolipid production by indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa J4 originating from petrochemical wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 27, 146–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.08.028.
Wickerman LJ. 1951. “Taxonomy of yeasts”, US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, No. 1029, Washington, pp. 1–56.
Yongmei H and Lu-Kwang J. 2001.Sophorolipid production from different lipid precursors observed with LC-MS. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 29, 593–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00439-2.
Yoo DS, Lee BS, Kim EK. 2005. Characteristics of microbial biosurfactant as an antifungal agent against plant pathogenic fungus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15, 1164–1169.



Copyright (c) 2014 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Spain (CC-by).


Contact us grasasyaceites@ig.csic.es

Technical support soporte.tecnico.revistas@csic.es