Pharmaceutical applications and consequent environmental impacts of Spirulina (Arthrospira): An overview

W. Shaoa*, R. Ebaida*, M. El-Sheekhc, A. Abomohrab,c,* and H. Eladeld

aSchool of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, 212013 Jiangsu, China

bSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, 212013 Jiangsu, China.

cBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, 31527 Tanta, Egypt

dBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, 13518 Benha, Egypt

*The first and second authors contributed equally to the present work.

*Corresponding author: abomohra@ujs.edu.cn; abomohra@science.tanta.edu.eg

 

SUMMARY

Recently, microalgae cultivation for different applications, including the production of nutritional and pharmaceutical active compounds has received increasing attention. Among the different genera, Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) is one of the most promising blue-green microalgae (Cyanophyta) because it is rich in antioxidants, essential amino acids (EAAs), minerals, proteins, polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamins. It has a high protein content (60-70% of the dry weight), which is a complete protein, i.e. containing all EAAs. Therefore, Spirulina is currently a commercial product with high nutritional value and also a significant source of complementary and alternative medicine. The objective of the present work was to review the pharmaceutical and therapeutic applications of Spirulina, especially its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-microbial, anti-diabetic, anti-obesity and anti-toxicity properties. The results were obtained from experiments in the literature performed in vitro and in vivo using experimental animals. The main reported active ingredients in Spirulina include phycocyanin, tocopherol, β-carotene, caffeic acids and chlorogenic acid, which showed individual or synergetic effects. In addition, the present review discusses the future perspectives of genetically modified Spirulina as a source for industrial products while producing valuable biomass photoautotrophically. Furthermore, the consequent environmental impacts of large-scale cultivation of Spirulina are discussed.

 

RESUMEN

Aplicaciones farmacéuticas e impactos ambientales de la Spirulina (Arthrospira). Una visión general. Recientemente, el cultivo de microalgas para diferentes aplicaciones, incluida la producción de compuestos activos nutricionales y farmacéuticos, está recibiendo una atención cada vez mayor. Entre los diferentes géneros, Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) es una de las microalgas azul-verde más prometedoras (Cyanophyta) porque es rica en antioxidantes, aminoácidos esenciales (EAAs), minerales, proteínas, ácidos grasos poliinsaturados y vitaminas. Tiene un alto contenido de proteína (60-70% del peso seco) es una proteína completa, es decir, contiene todos los EAAs. Por lo tanto, la Spirulina es actualmente un producto comercial con alto valor nutricional y también una fuente importante parala medicina complementaria y alternativa. El objetivo del presente trabajo es revisar las aplicaciones farmacéuticas y terapéuticas de Spirulina, especialmente propiedades antioxidantes, antiinflamatorias, anticancerígenas, antimicrobianas, antidiabéticas, antiobesidad y antitóxicas. Los resultados se obtienen a partir de trabajos experimentales realizados in vitro e in vivo utilizando animales de experimentación. Los principales ingredientes activos reportados en Spirulina incluyen ficocianina, tocoferol, β-caroteno, ácidos caféicos y clorogénico que mostraron efectos individuales o sinérgicos. Además, en la presente revisión se discute las perspectivas futuras de la Spirulina genéticamente modificada como fuente de productos industriales, al mismo tiempo que se produce una valiosa biomasa fotoautotrófica. Además, se discutieron los impactos ambientales consiguientes del cultivo a gran escala de la Spirulina.

 

Submitted: 11 June 2018; Accepted: 03 September 2018

ORCID ID: Shao W https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8067-3755, Ebaid R https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-5505, El-Sheekh M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2298-6312, Abomohra A https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-3297, Eladel H https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-2965

KEYWORDS: Arthrospira sp.; Cultivation; Environmental impacts; GMO; Pharmaceuticals; Spirulina

PALABRAS CLAVE: Arthrospira sp.; Cultivo; Impactos ambientales; OGM; Productos farmacéuticos; Spirulina

Citation/Cómo citar este artículo: Shao W, Ebaid R, El-Sheekh M, Abomohra A, Eladel H. 2019. Pharmaceutical applications and consequent environmental impacts of Spirulina (Arthrospira): An overview. Grasas Aceites 70 (1), e292. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0690181

Copyright: ©2019 CSIC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.


 

CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTIONTOP

Microorganisms have unique characteristics and therefore, they are considered good pillars for the large-scale production of many useful metabolites. Microbial cells have a high area/volume ratio, which results in high efficiency of nutrient uptake for the biosynthesis of different metabolites through different metabolic pathways. Microalgae are a wide group of photosynthetic microorganisms that can be isolated from various habitats and can grow efficiently in commercial large-scale raceway ponds or photobioreactors (Figure 1), where cells can grow on inexpensive nutrient sources to produce valuable compounds. Cyanophytes are a group of microalgae commonly grown in rice paddies and have a positive impact on growth, yield and nitrogen levels of the crop plants (Whitton, 2000). This group of microorganisms also known as cyanobacteria, as they resemble bacteria in that they are prokaryotes and lack the internal structures such as nucleus and other organelles found in eukaryotic microalgae. From the practical and economical point of view, microalgae offer numerous advantages, such as high photosynthetic efficiency which results in high growth rates, high CO2 mitigation rate, possibility for cultivation on arid lands using marine-, fresh- or wastewater (Abomohra et al., 2018).

Figure 1. Surface view of a raceway ponds (A) and partial view of tubular photobioreactor (B) used for microalgae cultivation (Modified from Abomohra et al., 2016).

 

Although many previous studies focused on different cyanophytes as nitrogen-fixing organisms, Spirulina is gaining attention due to its high nutritional value and extensive pharmaceutical applications (Table 1). The correct identification of a certain species is a fundamental requisite for research study and/or developmental applications. The genus Spirulina has been incorrectly used to describe two different genera, Spirulina and Arthrospira. However, Stizenberger (1854) and Gomont (1892–1893) classified the forms with visible septa within the genus Arthrospira Stizenberger 1852; while coiled filaments with invisible septa were classified as belonging to the genus Spirulina Turpin 1829 (Tomaselli, 1997). The view of Arthrospira and Spirulina as two separate genera has been officially accepted by Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Castenholz, 1989). The separation between these two genera has been repeatedly affirmed on the basis of many other characteristics such as cell wall structure, helicity, trichome size, motility, gas vesicles, thylakoid pattern, GC analysis and phylogenetically using 16S rRNA. Depending on the later, 16S rRNA of two Arthrospira strains (PCC 7345 and PCC 8005) and one Spirulina strain (PCC 6313) confirmed that the two Arthrospira strains form a tight cluster not closely related to the Spirulina strain, which supports the separation of these two genera (Tomaselli, 1997). Therefore, a molecular approach is not only useful for the precise identification of a certain species, but it also helps to understand the evolutionary relationships occurring among various microorganisms.

Table 1. Some reported applications of Spirulina
Applications/Activity References
Healthy food, forage and additives Jiménez et al., (2003)
Antioxidant Manoj et al., (1992); Miranda et al., (1998); Abomohra et al., (2016).
Anti-inflammatory Romay et al., (1998); Vázquez-Velasco et al., (2014).
Anti-cancer Schwartz and Shklar (1987); Schwartz et al., (1988); Liu et al., (2000); Subhashini et al., (2004).
Anti-microbial Kokou et al., (2012); Özdemir et al., (2004); Santoyo et al., (2006).
Anti-diabetes and anti-obesity Schwartz et al., (1988); Han et al., (2006).
Anti-toxicity Shastri et al., (1999); Kim et al., (2011); Abdel-Daim et al., (2016); Ebaid et al., (2017).

Spirulina is a photosynthetic autotrophic organism containing the blue pigment phycocyanin as the main photosynthetic pigment in addition to the green pigment chlorophyll a, which results in the blue-green color of the cells. Spirulina is one of multicellular unbranched non-heterocystous filamentous microalgae which are recognizable by the unique open left-handed helix along the entire length of the filament (Figure 2). The filaments are 50-500 μm in length and 2-4 μm wide, composed of only vegetative cells containing gas vacuoles. The long size filaments and strong cells allow successful filtration comparing to unicellular microalgae which results in the cost-effective harvest of Spirulina compared to other microalgal species. Currently, microalgae cultivation takes place in two major cultivation systems, namely closed photobioreactors (PBR) and open ponds. Both approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages which were discussed in details by Soni et al., (2017). However, Spirulina is mainly reported to be grown commercially in open ponds. Recently, new hybrid cost-effective techniques such as poly bags can also be used to increase algal biomass productivity (Soni et al., 2017).

Figure 2. Microscopic examination of Spirulina under light microscope (A, Ebaid et al., 2017) and scanning electron microscope (B, Ciferri 1984).

 

Many microorganisms are used as a massive sustainable resource for bio-pharmaceuticals which can be produced by direct extraction or after biomass bioprocessing. During secondary metabolism, microorganisms produce special secondary metabolites which possess special chemical structures and are not critical for the growth of the producing organism. In general, such metabolites are produced under unfavorable conditions in defense against predation, herbivory and competition for space. So far, some secondary metabolites from different microorganisms were isolated and identified in pure form. For example, chlorellin is a fatty acid produced by the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris and was first identified as an active anti-bacterial substance in 1940s (Centeno and Ballentine, 1999). On the other hand, the limited availability of fossil fuels and their environmental issues, especially participation in global warming, enhanced the extensive worldwide search for new renewable energy sources with combined CO2 mitigation. Spirulina was discussed as one of microalgae capable of producing different kinds of bioenergy with high efficiency of CO2 fixation (Sumprasit et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2018; Rempel et al., 2018), which provides the advantage of an eco-friendly utilization of Spirulina. The main aim of the present work was to provide a critical overview of the current status of the pharmaceutical applications of Spirulina, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-microbial, anti- diabetes & obesity and anti-toxicity activities. In addition, future perspectives in genetic engineering technologies to enhance valuable products from Spirulina were discussed. The present work shed light on the environmental impacts of large-scale cultivation of Spirulina as one of the economically important microalgae.

2. NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF SPIRULINATOP

Compared to other foods, Spirulina shows extraordinary nutritional value as it provides high levels of many essential nutrients and minerals (Table 2). However, the biochemical composition of Spirulina is highly dependent on growth conditions and the methods used for harvest and drying. In general, Capelli and Cysewski (2010) reported that the amount of calcium in Spirulina is 1.8 times higher than that in whole milk, total protein is 6.7 times that of tofu, iron is 51 times greater than that of spinach and β-carotene is 31 times more abundant than in carrots. Therefore, Spirulina was given the label of ‘super food’ by The World Health Organization (WHO). In addition, it was sent to space by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) due to its high nutritional value (Khan et al., 2005). Spirulina is produced commercially in open ponds by many producers (Table 3). Earthrise Farms, located in USA, covering 437060 m2, is the world’s largest producer of Spirulina. The company produces dried Spirulina in the form of tablets and powder in over 20 countries around the world with an average annual production of 550 tons. Other large Spirulina production plants are Cyanotech and Hainan DIC Microalgae located in USA and China, covering 364217 and 100000 m2 with annual production of 400 and 350 tons, respectively (Table 3). However, other companies sell Spirulina special products such as nutraceuticals, e.g. Myanmar Spirulina Factory (Yangon, Myanmar) sells tablets, chips, pasta and liquid extract.

Table 2. Typical analysis of the composition of Spirulina (per 3 grams of dry biomass, Moorhead et al., 2012)
Items Amount Items Amount
General Composition   Phytonutrients  
Carbohydrates 17-25% Chlorophyll 30 mg
Protein 53-62% Total carotenoids 15 mg
Lipids 4-6% β-carotene 6.8 mg
Minerals 8-13% Total phycocyanins 519 mg
Vitamins   C-phycocyanin 240 mg
Vitamin A 11,250 IU Zeaxanthin 9 mg
Vitamin B1 3.5 μg Superoxide dismutase 1080 units
Vitamin B2 140 μg Minerals  
Vitamin B3 400 μg Calcium 10 mg
Vitamin B6 30 μg Magnesium 15 mg
Vitamin B12 9.0 μg Iron 6.5 mg
Vitamin E 285 μg Phosphorus 33 mg
Inositol 1.7 μg Potassium 60 mg
Biotin 0.5 μg Sodium 30 mg
Folic acid 6.2 μg Manganese 400 μg
Pantothenic acid 4.5 μg Zinc 90 μg
Vitamin K1 60 μg Boron 22 μg
Vitamin K2 15 μg Copper 20 μg
    Selenium 0.9 μg
    Iodine 15 μg
Table 3. Some current commercial producers of Spirulina with annual production of biomass
Company Location Total area (m2) Production (ton)
Earthrise Farms USA 437060 550
Cyanotech USA 364217 400
Hainan DIC Microalgae Co., Ltd China 100000 350
Nao Pao Resins Chemical Co., Ltd Taiwan 50000 150
Boonsom Farm Thailand 40000 -
Siam Algae Co., Ltd. Thailand 30000 135
Solarium Biotechnology Chile 24000 13

3. PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SPIRULINATOP

Spirulina is the most highly consumed microalga (Bleakley and Hayes, 2017), which has been widely used as human healthy food centuries ago; and it is currently produced commercially as healthy food and valued additives in a hugely profitable business. In addition to its high nutritional value, Spirulina shows many biological activities such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-microbial, anti- diabetes & obesity and anti-toxicity.

3.1. Antioxidant activitiesTOP

Spirulina extracts show relatively high antioxidant activities that have attracted the attention of many researchers. Manoj et al., (1992) confirmed the activity of alcoholic extract of Spirulina in lipid peroxidation inhibition more significantly (65%) than some chemical antioxidants like α-tocopherol (35%) and β-carotene (48%). In addition, they reported that a hot-water extract of Spirulina has a greater antioxidant effect (76%) than chlorogenic acid (56%) and gallic acid (54%). Miranda et al., (1998) studied the in vivo and in vitro antioxidant activity of S. maxima methanolic extract. In vivo antioxidant activity as lipid peroxidation was studied in the plasma, brain and liver homogenates of experimental rats using a daily dose of 5 mg of methanolic extract. The extract contained total tocopherol, β-carotene and total phenolic compounds of 18 mg·L–1, 27.5 mg·L–1 and 96.3 mg·L–1, respectively. Upon treatment, the antioxidant activity increased in the plasma of the Spirulina-treated group by 31.5% over the control group. The antioxidant effect was mainly associated with the individual or synergetic effect of tocopherol, β-carotene and phenolic compounds. In another study, the antioxidant activity was attributed to the phenolic compounds found in the methanolic alga extract including salicylic, chlorogenic, trans-­cinnamic, caffeic acids, quimic and synaptic; individually or in a synergistic action (Baicus and Baicus, 2007). However, the caffeic acids and chlorogenic acid present in the Spirulina extract recorded more antioxidant efficiency than other acids (Henrikson, 1994); which also recorded a potential preventive action against cancer (Subhashini et al., 2004). Recently, Abomohra et al., (2016) concluded that the exposure of A. platensis to gamma radiation induces the cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by purinergic signaling, stimulating cells to produce more antioxidants under the induced oxidative stress.

3.2. Anti-inflammatory activitiesTOP

The light-harvesting pigment “phycocyanin” is one of phycobiliproteins along with phycoerythrin and allophycocyanin, and found exclusively in cyanobacteria, cryptophytes and red algae (Hu et al., 2018). The presence of phycocyanin gives the characteristic blue color of cyanophytes, and hence the name of blue green algae. Eriksen (2016) concluded that Spirulina is the sole efficient source of natural phycocyanin production under photoautotrophic conditions. Despite the challenges facing Spirulina cultivation and phycocyanin extraction, there are no other particular sources of natural phycocyanin (Hu et al., 2018). In addition to the autotrophic growth of Spirulina, it is also capable of heterotrophic growth in the presence of glucose, with a phycocyanin content of 57 mg·g−1 dry weight, which represents half of that obtained in mixotrophic cultivation (Marquez et al., 1993). Phycocyanin can also be produced from other microalgae, e.g. from the unicellular red alga Galdieria sulphuraria under heterotrophic conditions. However, the phycocyanin content in Spirulina grown phototrophically is much higher than that of G. sulphuraria grown heterotrophically (Table 4), which gives the advantage of a lower cost production of phycocyanin using Spirulina.

Table 4. Comparison of heterotrophic cultivation of Galdieria sulphuraria and phototrophic cultivation of Spirulina for phycocyanin production (Hu et al., 2018).
Microalgae Carbon source(g·L−1) Growth mode Phycocyanin content Reference
G. sulphuraria 074G Glucose (50) Heterotrophic 3.6 mg/g Schmidt et al. (2005)
G. sulphuraria 074G Fructose (50) Heterotrophic 3.4 mg/g Schmidt et al. (2005)
G. sulphuraria 074G Sucrose (50) Heterotrophic 4.3 mg/g Schmidt et al. (2005)
G. sulphuraria 074G Glucose (500) Heterotrophic 1.4–2.9 g/L Graverholt and Eriksen (2007)
G. sulphuraria 074G Glucose, fructose, glycerol (5) Heterotrophic 2–4 mg/g Sloth et al. (2006)
G. sulphuraria 074G Glucose (5) Heterotrophic 25–30 mg/g Sørensen et al. (2013)
S. platensis UTEX 1926 Glucose (2.5) Phototrophic 322 mg/L Chen et al. (1996)
S. platensis UTEX 1926 Acetate (2) Phototrophic 246 mg/L Chen et al. (1996)

In a previous study, Ebaid et al., (2017) estimated the phycocyanin content of 46.57 mg·g−1 dry weight in A. platensis grown in a Zarrouk medium for 18 days at 25 ± 3 °C and light intensity of 2500 Lux with a photoperiod of 18:6 h light: dark cycle. It is worth noting that the relative content of phycocyanin showed significant changes under different conditions of prevalent light, which was confirmed as a scavenging mechanism to prevent or reduce photoinhibitory damage (Mohanty et al., 1997). Romay et al., (1998) studied four in vivo experimental inflammation models (n = 7) and confirmed the activity of pure phycocyanin as an anti-inflammatory agent in all the studied models. Using 50, 100 and 200 mg·kg−1 of phycocyanin significantly reduced ear oedema induced by tetradecanoylphorbol acetate and arachidonic acid in mice by 47.6, 60.3 and 66.6%, respectively. In addition, the application of 50-200 mg·kg−1 of phycocyanin in experimental rats inhibited leukotriene B4 (LTB4), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels and oedema induced by arachidonic acid (Romay et al., 2000). Vázquez-Velasco et al., (2014) concluded that Spirulina protects against negative proinflammatory effects induced by glucomannan in Zucker Fa/Fa rats due to the high phycocyanin content.

3.3. Anti-cancer activitiesTOP

Many cancer forms result from cellular DNA damage, leading to uncontrolled cellular growth. Cellular endonucleases frequently repair the damaged DNA in order to keep the cell alive and healthy. The deactivation of these enzymes by oxidation, radiation or toxins results in errors in DNA, and eventually leads to the development of cancer. Many studies confirmed the anti-cancer activities of Spirulina extracts, either alone or in combination with other compounds. In vitro studies suggested the unique composition of Spirulina polysaccharides which enhance enzymatic activity and DNA repair. Decades ago, Schwartz and Shklar (1987) studied the effect of microalgae extracts on the induced squamous cell carcinoma of hamster buccal pouches in 20 animals. The results showed that Spirulina extract (Phycotene) resulted in total tumor regression by 30% of treated animals; while β-carotene and canthaxanthin resulted in total tumor regression by 20% and 15% of treated animals, respectively. This confirmed the higher anti-cancer activity of Spirulina extract than β-carotene or canthaxanthin. One year later, Schwartz et al., (1988) reported that the anti-cancer activity of the Spirulina extract was attributed to stimulation of the immune response to selectively destroy the small foci of developing malignant cells with no negative impacts on the normal cells. Liu et al., (2000) found that 160 mg·L−1 of c-phycocyanin from S. platensis significantly inhibited the in vitro growth of human leukemia K562 cells as colony numbers reduced from 4.8 in the control to 2.3 in the phycocyanin-treated cells after 12 days of incubation. In addition, Subhashini et al., (2004) reported that treatment with 50 μM of highly purified c-phycocyanin from S. platensis up to 48 h results in the inhibition of K562 cell proliferation by 49%. In another in vivo study, Simsek et al., (2008) suggested that S. platensis supplementation is useful in the treatment of anemia and leukemia induced by lead and cadmium toxicity. Moreover, Choi et al., (2013) investigated the anti-cancer activity of the marine cyanophyte S. maxima grown in deep seawater and reported effective suppression in the over-expression of the Bcl2 gene in A549 cells leading to the inhibition of various human cancer cells.

3.4. Anti-microbial activitiesTOP

A large number of algal extracellular products and/or extracts have been reported as antimicrobial (anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anti-algal, anti-protozoal) agents, although the detailed structure and identity of the active constituents of many of these are not yet known (Borowitzka 1995). Among microalgae, Spirulina is gaining more and more consideration as a natural antimicrobial agent. Kokou et al., (2012) confirmed the anti-bacterial activity of Spirulina against 6 Vibrio strains; V. anguillarum, V. splendidus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. scophthalmi, V. lentus and V. alginolyticus. The anti-microbial activity of acrylic acid, which is found in Spirulina in relatively high quantities, was confirmed at the end of 1970s. In addition to acrylic acid, probionic, benzoic, and mandelic organic acids were also reported as antimicrobial active compounds. Özdemir et al., (2004) also tested different extracts of S. platensis against bacteria and yeasts. They found that methanol extract was the most potent anti-microbial fraction. Santoyo et al., (2006) confirmed the anti-microbial activity of S. platensis using ethanol, hexane and petroleum ether as extracting solvents against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger and Candida albicans. Moreover, purified c-phycocyanin extracted from S. ­platensis showed substantial inhibition in the growth of many multidrug-resistant bacteria. For example, purified c-phycocyanin showed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in vitro of 125, 100, 75 and 50 mg·L−1 against S. aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Sarada et al., 2011).

In addition, Arun et al., (2012) confirmed the antifungal activity of S. platensis methanolic extract. According to Hayashi et al., (1993), S. platensis water-soluble extract also significantly inhibited the in vitro HSV−1 replication in HeLa cells with ED50 (the lowest phycocyanin concentration for reducing plaque number by 50%) at 0.173 mg·mL−1. The addition of 1 mg·mL−1 of S. platensis extract 3 h before viral infection resulted in 50% inhibition of virus protein synthesis without affecting the host. Subsequently, Hayashi et al., (1996) isolated calcium spirulan (Ca-SP) from S. platensis as a novel sulfate polysaccharide. The isolated Ca-SP inhibited the in vitro replication of several enveloped viruses such as the human cytomegalo virus, HSV−1, influenza A virus, measles virus, HIV−1 virus and mumps virus.

3.5. Anti-diabetes and anti-obesity activitiesTOP

The disease diabetes mellitus results from abnormalities in carbohydrate metabolism and is characterized by deficiencies in insulin secretion, resulting in hyperglycemia. The later was widely reported as the main reason for diabetic complications. Recently, the activity of Spirulina as anti-obesity and anti-diabetes was confirmed. The administration of 2 g·kg-1·day-1 of Spirulina for 21 days to alloxanized-induced diabetic rats (n = 10) resulted in a significant reduction in plasma glucose levels by 13.7% below the diabetic group (El-Desouki et al., 2015). They attributed the antihyperglycemic action of Spirulina to the potentiation of the pancreatic secretion of insulin from islet β-cells, or to enhancement of blood glucose transport to the peripheral tissue. In addition, Spirulina supplementation promotes vasodilation and restricts vasoconstriction which decreases the levels of plasma lipids and reduces blood pressure (Schwartz et al., 1988). Han et al., (2006) reported that glycolipid H-b2 extracted from Spirulina was found to reduce postprandial triglyceride (TGs) levels and inhibit pancreatic lipase activity in a dose-dependent way; while phycocyanin inhibited the pancreatic lipase activity, which resulted in higher excretion of TGs in experimental animals’ feces and reduced serum TGs.

3.6. Anti-toxicity activitiesTOP

Shastri et al., (1999) investigated the protective effect of S. fusiformis against lead toxicity in albino mice and recorded a pronounced increase in survival rate by administration of Spirulina. Recently, Ebaid et al., (2017) studied the protective effect of A. ­platensis against liver toxicity produced by treatment with copper nanoparticles. They confirmed the beneficial role of A. platensis as antioxidant markers which enhanced the hepatic functional parameters. Numerous mechanisms of cellular toxicity induction under stress conditions were suggested. Lipid peroxidation is one of the main mechanisms to induce cell damage due to the reaction of free radicals with lipids (Rajesh and Kala 2015). It results in malondialdehyde (MDA), which leads to oxidative stress by further interaction with many other molecules. Nigma et al., (1999) attributed ROS production under copper stress to antioxidant depletion or the direct effect of copper on the peroxidation reaction. However, Kim et al., (2011) reported that ROS alter various signal-transduction pathways in addition to the oxidation of vital cellular macromolecules such as DNA and lipids. ROS also increases the cytosolic Ca+2 levels by activation of non-selective cation channels in cell membranes (Mukherjee et al., 2002), promoting cell damage. The protective effect of Spirulina against oxidative stress was attributed to the relatively high contents of phycocyanin and carotenoids which result in antioxidant activity (Ebaid et al., 2017). In addition, S. platensis was found to positively influence the antioxidant enzyme level and oxidative stress markers under deltamethrin toxicity (Abdel-Daim et al., 2016), urethane and cisplatin (Premkumar et al., 2004) and mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide (Premkumar et al., 2001). In addition to its antioxidant properties, Spirulina showed a strong heavy metal chelating activity which reduced its toxicity as well (Rangsayator et al., 2002).

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSTOP

The scarcity of clean environments for the safe livelihood of human beings has gained global concerns. Continuous growth of the human population has resulted in an increase in petroleum consumption and growing energy demands all over the world. Due to human population growth, the world energy consumption is predicted to grow by 8.1% between 2015 and 2040, from 97.8 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) to 105.7 quadrillion Btu (Fig. 3A). The extensive use of fossil fuels contributes to high atmospheric CO2 levels, which are predicted to increase by 2.2% between 2015 and 2040 (Figure 3B). Increases in atmospheric CO2 raise the global air temperature, which is known as “global warming”. If this development continues, the planet will be threatened with the catastrophic changes in the earth’s climate. Global warming does not only mean the earth’s getting warmer, but it is associated with massive negative impacts on economic, social, and physical health which are of great distress. The melting of polar ice, violent surges of hurricanes and collapse of wildlife are all examples of how climate change can affect the planet. Microalgae are widely discussed to diminish the greenhouse effect by CO2 sequestration and abundant oxygen production. A stoichiometric amount of 1.8 kg CO2·kg−1 of microalgal biomass can be consumed which makes Spirulina cultivation using flue gas more economically and environmentally useful (Doucha et al., 2005). Based on the biomass produced by the area of Earthrise Farms (550 tons in 0.437 km2), about 990 tons of CO2 can be mitigated annually by Earthrise Farms. Thus, 28.9% of USA land area would be theoretically used to mitigate the global CO2 produced in 2015, which could be increased to 29.5% by the expected increase in CO2 emission in 2040 (Figure 3B). In addition, environmental pollution might result from the corruption of human resources by various micropollutants including pharmaceutical contaminants (Xiong et al., 2018). The distribution of these synthetic chemicals through the air, water and soil develop multidrug-resistant microorganisms. Therefore, the use of naturally synthesized products with the limitation of using chemical compounds will enhance the optimal utilization of pharmaceuticals.

Figure 3. Current and predicted global population and total energy consumption (A) and global CO2 emission as a result of fuel combustion with the estimated USA area required for global CO2 mitigation (B). Data in part was calculated from “Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2015”.

 

Water and land use are two important environmental factors that need to be considered. Interestingly, Spirulina cultivation can be done in arid lands where no other crops can survive (Soni et al., 2016). In addition, it needs relatively lower amount of water, as water can be recycled after harvest. After the extraction of essential compounds from the biomass, the residual biomass can be used in many other applications in what is called refining process (Figure 4). For example, sugar-based and cellulosic biorefining results in the accumulation of protein by-products, which can be used as animal feed (Soni et al., 2016). In addition, after the extraction of essential compounds, the residual biomass can be used as energy feedstock for biodiesel production from lipids and/or bioethanol production from carbohydrate residues. Thus, integrated food and energy systems are designed to combine, intensify, and increase the productivity of food and energy simultaneously through sustainable land management (Soni et al., 2016). Using Spirulina as bioenergy feedstock showed promising results in many studies. Sumprasit et al., (2017) studied energy recovery in the form of biodiesel and biogas from ubiquitous S. platensis and recorded a biodiesel yield of 7.1% of dry weight. The results also confirmed that lipid-free residue can be used as feedstock for biogas production with an average methane yield of about 290 mL·g−1 VS. In addition, Shao et al., (2018) reported the efficiency of Cd2+-sorbed Arthrospira platensis for bioethanol production due to the accumulation of carbohydrates. Moreover, Chagas et al., (2016) studied the catalytic pyrolysis of Arthrospira platensis and Arthrospira maxima using pyrolysis/GC–MS. They found that the high acidity of HZSM-5 catalysts could maximize the conversion of biomass to aromatic hydrocarbons and the aromatic yields increased as the catalyst/biomass ratio increased from 1:1 to 10:1.By food-energy integration, Spirulina products are even more economically competitive with high diversification. Consequently, large-scale cultivation of Spirulina will not only have healthy and economic benefits, but will also help to save our planet.

Figure 4. Illustration showing the refining concept and different pathways of Spirulina applications.

 

5. GENETIC ENGINEERING OF SPIRULINATOP

Genetic engineering facilitates the duplication and manipulation of specific fragments of DNA for industrial, medical and research purposes. Recently, genetic engineering led to a revolution in molecular biology with many benefits in different fields, especially in medicine. The cloning of recombinant DNA facilitates the use of bacteria to produce important proteins such as human insulin which is of great importance and now marketed throughout the world. It was revealed that biosynthetic pathways for the production of different cellular macromolecules are complex processes which include many genes (Bhunia et al., 2018). Many industrial compounds can be produced by several molecular techniques such as rational and non-rational mutagenesis, including site-specific mutagenesis, random mutagenesis, and site-saturation mutagenesis. In the last few decades, extensive research has been carried out to understand the biosynthesis genetic regulations of different valuable products in cyanophytes. For example, enhanced alcohol production via genetic engineering has been implemented in two independent cyanobacterial strains through the over-expression of pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II genes (Deng and Coleman, 1999). In addition, previous studies on the regulation of desaturase gene expression in Spirulina platensis revealed that the mRNA level and mRNA stability of the D6D gene increased drastically by decreasing the growth temperature from 35 to 22 °C, which led to an increase in the cellular γ-linolenic acid level by approximately 30% (Deshnium et al., 2000; Honsthong et al., 2003). Further, site-specific mutation studies by Subudhi et al., (2008) demonstrated that the sequence TATAAT located at −33 bp was essential for the D6D promoter function and suggested a complex regulation of D6D gene expression in Spirulina.

Currently, most cloned genes are introduced into bacteria or fungi on heterotrophic growth media for industrial enzyme production. However, developing a protocol for using Spirulina instead involves an economic and procedural reason for considering it as an alternate producer of industrial enzymes. Spirulina can grow autotrophically by converting light energy into biomass rich in minerals, protein, vitamin B12, essential fatty acids, amino acids and β-carotene. In addition, Spirulina does not require physical or chemical pre-treatment in order to become digestible due to the absence of a cellulosic cell wall (Toyomizu et al., 2001a). Moreover, residual biomass after the extraction of valuable molecules can be used as feed for fish, farm animals and poultry (Toyomizu et al., 2001b; Abomohra et al., 2014). Therefore, the development of a method for stable gene cloning into Spirulina as a biological factory for recombinant enzyme production will have many advantages. Unfortunately, the genetic engineering methods for Spirulina have been almost non-existent due to the absence of plasmids in Spirulina (Vachhani and Vonshak, 1997; Toyomizu et al., 2001a). Some Spirulina platensis genes involved in fundamental processes such as protein synthesis, carbon dioxide fixation and nitrogen metabolism were successfully cloned (e.g. Bini et al., 1992; Nelissen et al., 1994; Murata et al., 1996). However, the development of gene transfer systems is a big challenge. Using the plasmid pKK232–8 carrying a promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene, Cheevadhanarak et al., (1993) transformed S. ­platensis to stably express the CAT gene which maintained under selection pressure for several generations. However, the stability of the transformants was a major problem, as the transformation system developed for Spirulina must be efficient and allow not only a good degree of expression of the introduced gene but also to maintain itself in a fast-growing culture. Toyomizu et al., (2001a) studied the optimization of electroporation of plasmid pHSG399 in S. platensis. The plasmid contained a chloramphenicol resistance gene which produces an E. coli protein, Cm acetyltransferase (CAT). They reported that Spirulina is a suitable organism for the expression of genetically engineered proteins, but the gene transfer system has not yet been established. Later, Kawata et al., (2004) employed a new approach using natural transposase, mini-Tn5 transposon, and a cation liposome to transform Spirulina platensis as a stable recombinant DNA methodology. According to Toyomizu et al., (2001a), more research is needed to investigate other requirements for a ‘stable’ S. platensis gene transfer system, which include; (1) cloning and assessment of Spirulina promoters using a plasmid carrying a promoterless CAT reporter gene, (2) developing a simple and rapid method for sensitive fluorometric determination of Spirulina transformants, and (3) subjecting Spirulina transformants to protoplast fusion in glycine, for cloning. Thus, genetic engineering techniques currently used in plant and microbial biotechnology are required to enable Spirulina, as an autotrophic factory, to produce desired molecules in order to incorporate algal biotechnology products into industrial technologies.

6. CONCLUSIONSTOP

Spirulina is considered as a valuable pharmaceutical agent which offers many unique features with many environmental and health benefits. Despite their extensive applications for nutrition, the industrial production of Spirulina is still more or less limited to relatively small areas. In addition, the molecular engineering of Spirulina seems as a neglected research field in spite of its importance to resolving many challenges, and any piece of work accumulated at this stage will be undoubtedly of great value. There is much more research which needs to be done, including innovative cultivation systems and development of successful genetic and molecular biology tools for Spirulina. The development of a reliable genetic engineering methodology will open the way, not only for better basic research, but also will enable a better program for the development of new and better strains to be used by the industry. This could integrate Spirulina into the industrial sector for the production of essential industrial products while producing valuable nutrient-rich biomass. In addition, nutritional awareness and increasing the acceptance level of Spirulina are required in order to develop such Spirulina-fortified products. At the same time, further scientific, clinical and toxicological research is required to evaluate the safety of large-scale production of Spirulina with harvest at minimum contamination rates, since contamination with harmful elements or toxic substances might potentially cause several serious human health effects.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSTOP

This work was financially supported by the Key Program of Science and Technology of the Jiangsu Province, China (grant number BE2016353) and Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MHESR).

 

REFERENCESTOP


Abdel-Daim M, El-Bialy B, Abdel Rahman H, Radi A, Hefny H, Hassan A. 2016. Antagonistic effects of Spirulina platensis against subacute deltamethrin toxicity in mice: Biochemical and histopathological studies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 77, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2015.12.003
Abomohra A, El-Sheekh M, Hanelt D. 2014. Pilot cultivation of the chlorophyte microalga Scenedesmus obliquus as a promising feedstock for biofuel. Biomass Bioenergy 64, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.049
Abomohra A, El-Shouny W, Sharaf M, Abo-Eleneen M. 2016. Effect of Gamma Radiation on Growth and Metabolic Activities of Arthrospira platensis. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 59, e16150476. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2016150476
Abomohra A, Eladel H, El-Esawi M, Wang S, Wang Q, He Z, Feng Y, Shang H, Hanelt D. 2018. Effect of lipid-free microalgal biomass and waste glycerol on growth and lipid production of Scenedesmus obliquus: Innovative waste recycling for extraordinary lipid production. Bioresour. Technol. 249, 992–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.102
Arun N, Gupta S, Singh DP. 2012. Antimicrobial and antioxidant property of commonly found microalgae Spirulina platensis, Nostoc muscorum and Chlorella pyrenoidosa against some pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 3, 4866–4875. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(12).4866-75
Baicus C, Baicus A. 2007. Spirulina did not ameliorate idiopathic chronic fatigue in four N-of-1 randomized controlled trials. Phytother. Res. 21, 570–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2114
Bhunia B, Uday U, Oinam G, Mondal A, Bandyopadhyay T, Tiwari O. 2018. Characterization, genetic regulation and production of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides and its applicability for heavy metal removal. Carbohydr. Polym. 179, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.091
Bini F, De Rossi E, Barbierato L, Riccardi G. 1992. Molecular cloning and sequencing of the ß-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase gene from the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-138-3-493
Bleakley S, Hayes M. 2017. Algal proteins: Extraction, application, and challenges concerning production. Foods 6, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6050033
Borowitzka M. 1995. Microalgae as sources of pharmaceuticals and other biologically active compounds. J. Appl. Phycol. 7, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003544
Capelli B, Cysewski GR. 2010. Potential health benefits of Spirulina microalgae. Nutrafoods 9, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03223332
Castenholz RW. 1989. Subsection III, Order Oscillatoriales. In Stanley JT, Bryant MP, Pfenning N, Holt JG (Eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 3, Baltimore: William and Wilkins, p. 1771.
Centeno P, Ballentine DL. 1999. Effects of culture conditions on production of antibiotically active metabolites by the marine alga Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta), I. Light. J. Appl. Phycol. 11, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008038418777
Chagas B, DoradoC, Serapiglia M, Mullen C, Boateng A, Melo M, Ataíde C. 2016. Catalytic pyrolysis-GC/MS of Spirulina: evaluation of a highly proteinaceous biomass source for production of fuels and chemicals. Fuel 179, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.076
Cheevadhanarak S, Kanokslip S, Chaisawadi S, Rachdawong S, Tanticharoen M. 1993. Transformation system for Spirulina platensis. In Masojidek J, Setlik I. (Eds) Book of Abstracts of the 6th International Conference on Applied Algology, Czech Republic, p. 109.
Chen F, Zhang Y, Guo S. 1996. Growth and phycocyanin formation of Spirulina platensis in photoheterotrophic culture. Biotechnol. Lett. 18, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140211
Choi WY, Kang DH, Lee HY. 2013. Enhancement of immune activation activities of Spirulina maxima grown in deep sea water. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 12205–12221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140612205
Ciferri O. 1984. Spirulina, the edible microorganism. Microbiol. Rev. 47, 551–578.
Deng MD, Coleman JR. 1999. Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 523–528.
Deshnium P, Paithoonrangsarid K, Suphatrakul A, Meesapyodsuk D, Tanticharoen M, Cheevadhanarak S. 2000. Temperature-independent and -dependent expression of desaturase genes in filamentous cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis strain C1 (Arthrospira sp. PCC 9438). FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 184, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09015.x
Doucha J, Straka F, Livansky K. 2005. Utilization of flue gas for cultivation of microalgae (Chlorella sp.) in an outdoor open thin layer photobioreactor. J. Appl. Phycol. 17, 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-8701-7
Ebaid R, Elhussainy E, El-Shourbagy S, Ali S, Abomohra A. 2017. Protective effect of Arthrospira platensis against liver injury induced by copper nanoparticles. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 17, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-017-0264-z
El-Desouki N, Tabl G, Abdel-Aziz K, Salim E, Nazeeh N. 2015. Improvement in beta-islets of Langerhans in alloxan-induced diabetic rats by erythropoietin and Spirulina. J. Basic App. Zool. 71, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobaz.2015.04.003
Eriksen NT. 2016. Research trends in the dominating microalgal pigments, β-carotene, astaxanthin, and phycocyanin used in feed, in foods, and in health applications. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 6, 507. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000507
Global Energy Statistical Yearbook, Enerdata 2015. Available at https://yearbook.enerdata.net, Accessed on December 2017.
Gomont M. 1892–1893. Monographie des Oscillarièes. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 15, 263–368, 16, 91–264.
Graverholt OS, Eriksen NT. 2007. Heterotrophic high-cell-density fedbatch and continuous-flZ cultures of Galdieria sulphuraria and production of phycocyanin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1150-2
Han LK, Li DX, Xiang L, Kondo Y, Suzuki I, Okuda H.2006. Isolation of pancreatic lipase activity-inhibitory component of Spirulina platensis and it reduce postprandial triacylglycerolemia. Yakugaku. Zasshi. 126, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.126.43
Hayashi K, Hayashi T, Morita N. 1993. An extract from Spirulina platensis is a selective inhibitor of herpes simplex virus type 1 penetration into HeLa cells. Phytother. Res. 7, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650070118
Hayashi T, Hayashi K, Maedaa M, Kojima I. 1996. Calcium spirulan, an inhibitor of enveloped virus replication, from a blue-green alga Spirulina platensis. J. Nat. Prod. 59, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1021/np960017o
Henrikson R. 1994. Microalga Spirulina, superalimento del futuro. Ronore Enterprises. 2nd ed. Ediciones Urano, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 222.
Honsthong A, Deshnium P, Paithoonrangsarid K, Cheevadhanarak S, Tanticharoen M. 2003. Differential responses of three acyl-lipid desaturases to immediate temperature reduction occurring in two lipid membranes of Spirulina platensis strain C1. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70143-7
Hu J, Nagarajan D, Zhang Q, Chang J, Lee D. 2018. Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae for pigment production: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 36, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.09.009
Jimenez C, Cossio BR, Niell FX.2003. Relationship between physicochemical variables and productivity in open ponds for the production of Spirulina: A predictive model of algal yield. Aquaculture 221, 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00123-6
Kawata Y, Yano S, Kojima H, Toyomizu M. 2004. Transformation of Spirulina platensis strain C1 (Arthrospira sp. PCC9438) with Tn5 transposase–transposon DNA–cation liposome complex. Mar. Biotechnol. 6, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-003-0037-1
Khan Z, Bhadouria P, Bisen P. 2005. Nutritional and therapeutic potential of Spirulina. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 6, 373–379. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920105774370607
Kim D, Kim J, Goh E, Kim W, Kim S, Seo Y, Jang C, Kang S. 2011. Antioxidant response of Arabidopsis plants to gamma irradiation: Genome-wide expression profiling of the ROS scavenging and signal transduction pathways. J. Plant. Physiol. 168, 1960–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.008
Kokou F, Makridis P, Kentouri M, Divanach P. 2012. Anti-bacterial activity in microalgae cultures. Aquacult. Res. 43, 1520–1527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02955.x
Liu Y, Xu L, Cheng N, Lin L, Zhang C. 2000. Inhibitory effect of phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis on the growth of human leukemia K562 cells. J. Appl. Phycol. 12, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008132210772
Manoj G, Venkataraman LV, Srinivas L. 1992. Antioxidant properties of Spirulina (Spirulina platensis). In: Seshadri CV, Jeejibai N, editors. ETTA National Symposium on Spirulina. MCRC Publishers, New York, USA, pp. 148–154.
Márquez FJ, Sasaki K, Kakizono T, Nishio N, Nagai S. 1993. Growth characteristics of Spirulina platensis in mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 5, 408–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(93)90034-6
Miranda MS, Cintra RG, Barros SM, Mancini-Filho J. 1998. Antioxidant activity of the microalga Spirulina maxima. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 31, 1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X1998000800007
Mohanty P, Srivastava M, Krishna K. 1997. The Photosynthetic Apparatus of Spirulina: Electron Transport and Energy Transfer. In: Vonshak A, Spirulina platensis (Arthrospira) Physiology, cell-biology and biotechnology. 1997, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
Moorhead K, Capelli B, Cysewski G. 2012. Spirulina: Nature’s Superfood. 3rd edition, Cyanotech Corporation, Kailua Kona, Hawaii, USA.
Mukherjee SB, Das M, Sudhandiran G, Shaha C. 2002. Increase in cytosolic Ca2+ levels through the activation of non-selective cation channels induced by oxidative stress causes mitochondrial depolarization leading to apoptosis-like death in Leishmania donovani promastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24717–24727. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201961200
Murata N, Deshnium P, Tasaka Y. 1996. Biosynthesis of gamma-linolenic acid in the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. In Huang Y, Milles DE (Eds) Gamma-linolenic acid, metabolism and its role in nutrition and medicine, AOC Press, Champaign, Illinois, p. 22.
Nelissen B, Wilmotte A, Neefs JM, De Wachter R. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among filamentous helical cyanobacteria investigated on the basis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis. Syst. App. Microbiol. 17, 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80009-3
Nigma D, Shukla G, Agarwal A. 1999. Glutathione depletion and oxidative damage in mitochondria following exposure to cadmium in rat liver and kidney. Toxicol. Lett. 106, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00059-4
Özdemir G, Karabay NU, Dalay MC, Pazarbasi B. 2004. Antibacterial activity of volatile component and various extracts of Spirulina platensis. Phytother. Res. 18, 754–757. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1541
Premkumar K, Abraham SK, Santhiya ST, Ramesh A. 2004. Protective effect of Spirulina fusiformis on chemical-induced genotoxicity. Fitoterapia 75, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2003.07.008
Premkumar K, Pachiappan A, Abraham SK, Santhiya ST, Gopinath PM, Ramesh A. 2001. Effect of Spirulina fusiformis on cyclophosphamide and mitomycin-C induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in mice. Fitoterapia 72, 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00340-9
Rajesh V, Kala M. 2015. Antiproliferative and chemopreventive effect of Annona muricata Linn. on Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and Benzo[a]pyrene induced lung carcinoma. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 15, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-015-0199-1
Rangsayator N, Upatham ES, KruatrachureM, Pokethitiyook P, Lanza G. 2002. Phytoremediation potential of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis: Biosorption and toxicity studies of cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 119, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00324-4
Rempel A, Machado T, Treichel H, Colla E, Margarites A, Colla L. 2018. Saccharification of Spirulina platensis biomass using free and immobilized amylolytic enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 263, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.114
Romay C, Ledon N, Gonzalez R. 1998. Further studies on anti-inflammatory activity of phycocyanin in some animal models of inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 47, 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000110050338
Romay C, Ledon N, Gonzalez R. 2000. Effects of phycocyanin extract on prostaglandin E2 levels in mouse ear inflammation test. Arzneim -Forsch. 50, 1106–1109.
Santoyo S, Herrero S, Señorans M, Cifuentes F, Ibáñez A. 2006. Functional characterization of pressurized liquid extracts of Spirulina platensis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 224, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0291-3
Sarada DL, Kumar CS, Rengasamy R. 2011. Purified C-phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis (Nordstedt) Geitler: A novel and potent agent against drug resistant bacteria. World J. Microb. Biot. 27, 779–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0516-2
Schmidt RA, Wiebe MG, Eriksen NT. 2005. Heterotrophic high cell density fed-batch cultures of the phycocyanin producing red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20417
Schwartz J, Shklar G. 1987. Regression of experimental hamster cancer by beta carotene and algae extracts. J. Oral. Maxillofacial Surg. 5, 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(87)80011-3
Schwartz J, Shklar G, Reid S, Trickler D. 1988. Prevention of experimental oral cancer by extracts of Spirulina- Dunaliella algae. Nutrition Cancer 11, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635588809513979
Shao W, Ebaid R, Abomohra A, Shahen M. 2018. Enhancement of Spirulina biomass production and cadmium biosorption using combined static magnetic field. Bioresour. Technol. 265, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.009
Shastri D, Kumar MM, Kumar A. 1999. Modulation of lead toxicity by Spirulina fusiformis. Phytother. Res. 13, 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(199905)13:3<258::AID-PTR438>3.0.CO;2-2
Simsek N, Karadeniz A, Kalkanc Y, Keles ON, Unal B. 2008. Spirulina platensis feeding inhibited the anemia- and leucopenia-induced lead and cadmium in rats. J. Hazard. Mater. 164, 1304–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.041
Sloth JK, Wiebe MG, Eriksen NT. 2006. Accumulation of Phycocyanin in heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultures of the acidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 38, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.05.010
Soni R, Sudhakar K, Rana R. 2016. Sustainable biomass production from microalgae for food, feed and biofuels: An integrated approach. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Comm. 9, 729–736.
Soni R, Sudhakar K, Rana R. 2017. Spirulina – From growth to nutritional product: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol.69, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.09.010
Sørensen L, Hantke A, Eriksen NT. 2013. Purification of the photosynthetic pigment C-phycocyanin from heterotrophic Galdieria sulphuraria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 2933–2938. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6116
Stizenberger E. 1854. Spirulina und Arthrospira (nov. gen.). Hedwigia 1, 32–41.
Subhashini J, Mahipal SK, Reddy MC, Reddy MM, Rachamallu A, Reddanna P. 2004. Molecular mechanisms in C-Phycocyanin induced apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line- K562. Biochem. Pharmacol. 68, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.025
Subudhi S, Kurdrid P, Hongsthong A, Sirijuntarut M, Cheevadhanarak S, Tanticharoen M. 2008. Isolation and functional characterization of Spirulina D6D gene promoter: Role of a putative GntR transcription factor in transcriptional regulation of D6D gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 365, 643–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.018
Sumprasit N, Wagle N, Glanpracha N, Annachhatre A. 2017. Biodiesel and biogas recovery from Spirulina platensis. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 119, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.11.006
Tomaselli L. 1997. Morphology, Ultrastructure and Taxonomy of Arthrospira (Spirulina) maxima and Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis. In: Vonshak A, Spirulina platensis (Arthrospira) Physiology, cell-biology and biotechnology. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
Toyomizu M, Suzuki K, Kawata Y, Kojima H, Akiba Y. 2001a. Effective transformation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis using electroporation. J. App. Phycol.13, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011182613761
Toyomizu M, Sato K, Taroda H, Kato T, Akiba Y. 2001b. Effects of dietary Spirulina on meat colour in muscle of broiler chickens. Bri. Poult. Sci. 42, 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120048447
Vachhani A, Vonshak A. 1997. Genetics of Spirulina. In: Vonshak A, Spirulina platensis (Arthrospira) Physiology, cell-biology and biotechnology. 1997, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
Vázquez-Velasco M, González-Torres L, López-Gasco P, Bastida S, Benedí J, Sánchez-Reus M, González-Muñoz M, Sánchez-Muniz F. 2014. Liver oxidation and inflammation in Fa/Fa rats fed glucomannan/Spirulina-surimi. Food Chem. 159, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.015
Whitton BA. 2000. Soils and rice-fields. In: Whitton BA, Potts M, editor. The ecology of cyanobacteria. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 233–255.
Xiong J, Kurade M, Jeon B. 2018. Can Microalgae Remove Pharmaceutical Contaminants from Water?. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.003



Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Contact us grasasyaceites@ig.csic.es

Technical support soporte.tecnico.revistas@csic.es