Grasas y Aceites 72 (1)
January-March, e391
ISSN-L: 0017-3495
https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.1135192

Effect of the damages caused by the green shield bug (Palomena prasina L.) on the qualitative traits of hazelnuts

Efecto de los daños causados por el insecto escudo verde (Palomena prasina L.) en las características cualitativas de la avellana

A. Turan

Giresun University, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Hazelnut Expertise Programme, 28100, Giresun, Turkey

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-6605

SUMMARY

This study was conducted in 2018 to determine the effects of green shield bug damage (GD) on the chemical properties of the hazelnut cultivar “Tombul”. The proximate composition, protein, total lipid (TL), carbohydrate, total ash ratio (TA), vitamin E (VE), total phenolics, energy values (EV), color value, fatty acid composition, total fatty acids, lipid oxidation, and nutritional quality index properties of the kernel were detected in relation to the "bug damage". The level of TL, TA, VE, EV, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and unsaturated/saturated fatty acids (UFA/SFA) were found to be lower in GD kernels than in good kernels (GK). Although the GD kernels had higher iodine, free fatty acidity, and peroxide levels, they showed lower oleic/linoleic acid levels, and rancimat values. In addition, the GD kernels contained lower PUFA/SFA and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratios but higher atherogenicity and thrombogenicity index values.

KEYWORDS: 
Bug damage; Corylus avellana L.; Fatty acid profile; Oil oxidation; Proximate composition
RESUMEN

Este estudio se realizó en 2018 para determinar el efecto del daño del insecto escudo verde (DV) en las propiedades químicas del cultivar de avellana "Tombul". La composición proximal, proteína, lípidos totales (LT), carbohidratos, relación total de cenizas (CT), vitamina E (VE), fenólicos totales, valores de energía (E), color, composición de ácidos grasos, ácidos grasos totales, oxidación de lípidos e índice de calidad nutricional se determinaron en relación con los daños causados por el insecto. Se encontró que el nivel de LT, CT, VE, E, ácidos grasos monoinsaturados (MUFA) y ácidos grasos insaturados/saturados (UFA/SFA) fue menor en los granos de DV que en los granos buenos (GB). Aunque los granos de DV tienen niveles más altos de yodo, acidez, grasa libre y peróxidos, tienen niveles más bajos de la relación ácido oleico/linoleico y de los valores de rancimat. Además, los granos de DV tienen una relación más baja PUFA/SFA y de hipocolesterolémica/hipercolesterolémica, pero tienen valores de índice de aterogenicidad y trombogenicidad más altos.

PALABRAS CLAVE: 
Composición proximal; Corylus avellana L.; Daño por insecto; Oxidación de aceite; Perfil de ácidos grasos

Submitted: 11  November  2019; Accepted: 13  January  2020; Published online: 3 March 2021

Citation/Cómo citar este artículo: Turan A. 2021. Effect of the damages caused by the green shield bug (Palomena prasina L.) on the qualitative traits of hazelnuts. Grasas y Aceites 72 (1), e391. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.1135192

CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION

 

Among nuts, the hazelnut is the richest in terms of vitamin E and oleic acid (C18:1) contents. In addition, it is a good source of bioactive compounds (Alaşalvar et al., 2010Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820 ). 100-g portion of hazelnut kernels containing on average 10%-24% protein meets 22% of the daily protein intake, and contains 50-65% fat, with the oleic acid as the primary fatty acid, followed by linoleic, palmitic, stearic, and linolenic acid (Köksal et al., 2006Köksal Aİ, Artik N, Şimşek A, Güneş N. 2006. Nutrient composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey. Food Chem. 99, 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.013 ; Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Özay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alaşalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016 ). Parcerisa et al., (1995)Parcerisa J, Boatella J, Codony R, Rafecas M, Castellote AI, Garcia J, Lopez A, Romero A. 1995. Comparison of fatty acid and triacylglycerol composition of different hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) cultivated in Catalonia (Spain). J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 13-16. reported that the Spanish hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) contained 60.23% fat, 5.79% palmitic, 0.28% palmitoleic, 1.97% stearic, 79.1% oleic, and 12.58% linoleic acids. In addition, Cristofori et al., (2015)Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits 70, 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025 reported that the Italian hazelnut contained 47.06%-49.65% fat, 5.29-7.06% palmitic, 79.78-83.66% oleic acid, and 7.48-10.52% linoleic acids.

Hazelnuts are a good source of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), tocopherol, phytosterol, polyphenol, and phytochemicals (Alaşalvar et al., 2006Alaşalvar C, Amaral JS, Shahidi F. 2006. Functional lipid characteristics of Turkish Tombul hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 10177-10183. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061702w ; Shahidi et al., 2007Shahidi F, Alaşalvar C, Liyana-Pathırana CM. 2007. Antioxidant phytochemicals in hazelnut kernel (Corylus avellana L.) and hazelnut by products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 551212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062472o ; Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Özay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alaşalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016 ). The high level of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) not only increases the nutritional quality of the hazelnut but also makes it more sensitive to oil oxidation. A high level of MUFA tends to increase HDL cholesterol; whereas LDL has a tendency to lower cholesterol (Olivera et al., 2008Oliveira I, Sousa A, Morais JS, Ferreira ICFR, Bento A, Estevinho L, Pereira JA. 2008. Chemical composition, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of three hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars. Food Chem. Tox. 46, 1801-1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.026 ). Therefore, hazelnuts are highly beneficial as they prevent the vascular occlusion associated with cholesterol.

Fatty acids do not remain constant but vary based on genetic, ecological, morphological, and physiological properties and cultural practices. As a result of the lack of accurate and timely agricultural measures associated with cultural practices, damage to hazelnuts by bugs causes large economic losses in the form of kernel abortion, malformation, and the occurrence of necrotic tissues (Memoli et al., 2017Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x ). Numerous bug species that cause such damage and affect cultivar quality are found in Turkish hazelnut orchards (Bosco et al., 2018Bosco L, Moraglio ST, Tavella L. 2018. Halyomorpha halys, a serious threat for hazelnut in newly invaded areas. J. Pest Sci. 91, 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0937-x ). There are more than 15 detrimental bug species, and the green shield bug (Palomenaprasina L.) is known to be the most harmful (Erper et al., 2016Erper İ, Saruhan İ, Akça İ, Aksoy HM, Tuncer C. 2016. Evaluation of some entomophogenetic fungi for controlling to green shield bug, Palomena prasina L. (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Egyp. J. Bio. Pest. Cont. 26, 573-578; Ak et al., 2018Ak K, Tuncer C, Baltacı A, Eser Ü, Saruhan İ. 2018. Indicence and severity of stink bug damage on kernel in Turkish hazelnut orchards. Acta Hortic. 1226, 407-412. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1226.62 ). The damage to hazelnuts which is caused by green shield bugs, called kernel spot, is not detectable by appearance. Therefore, manufacturers can sell the products without any problem. However, there is no management strategy to prevent this damage. Spotted kernel damage is a serious concern, particularly for hazelnut exporters. The kernel spot damage negatively affects hazelnuts in terms of appearance and taste and causes problems for their use in chocolate production and as dried nuts (Saruhan and Tuncer, 2010Saruhan İ, Tuncer C. 2010. Research on damage rate and type of green shield bug (Palomena prasina L. Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on hazelnut. J. Agric. Sci. 25, 75-83).

It has been reported that cimiciate damage reduces the total fat, saturated fatty acids (SFA), and single SFA levels in the Italian hazelnut cultivar Tonda di Giffoni (Memoli et al., 2017Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x ). Neverthless, information regarding the effects of pests on the chemical properties of Turkish hazelnut cultivars is extremely limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of GD on the qualitative traits and kernel composition on "Tombul", the most widely used hazelnut cultivar in Turkey.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

2.1. Kernel samples

 

The study was conducted on “Tombul” hazelnuts in 2018 from a single orchard, and nut samples were provided by Yavuz Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Giresun, Turkey) (40°54´37.33˝N, 38°26´17.23˝E, and altitude 12 m). The average kernel moisture content was ∼27.5% at the time of harvest (August 4 - August 5, 2018). The clusters were spread on the grass ground and dehydrated for 3 days (August 9 to August 12, 2018) to allow moisture loss (∼21.52%). Then, the nuts were separated from their husks by hand. The samples were dried in the sun and the drying process continued until the moisture content was 6.45%.The samples (unshelled) were kept in a 2 kg vacuum polyethylene package (150 ± 8 µm thickness, 0.029 gm−2/day oxygen permeability, 5 gm−2/day water vapor permeability), and stored in a refrigerator (Bosch KDN53NW22N A, No-Frost, Germany) at 60-65% relative humidity and −5 °C temperature until oil extraction and further analysis.

2.2. Oil extraction

 

Hazelnut oil was extracted using a Ceselsan cold press oil extraction system (AISI3004, Ceselsan, Giresun, Turkey) (compression force: 10,000 kgf, pressure: 34.7 MPa, temperature: −5 °C to +45 °C, and capacity: 250 g kernel) (Turan, 2018aTuran A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y ). The extracted hazelnut oil was stored in the freezer at −18 °C until analysis (Bosch KDN53NW22N A, No-Frost, Germany).

2.3. Proximate analysis

 
2.3.1. Moisture, protein, total lipid, ash, carbohydrate, and energy value
 

Moisture content is based on the Turkish Standards Institute (EN ISO 65-2000) -TS 3075/T1 hazelnut kernel standard (Turan, 2018bTuran A. 2018b. Effect of drying methods on nut quality of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 4554-4565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3391-8 ). Shredded hazelnuts (Fakir Motto 800 w, Germany) were dried at 105 °C until constant weight (Refsan RK 55, Kutahya, Turkey). The protein level was determined according to the AOAC standard method (N×6.25) with 0.5 g of sample using the macro Kjehldahl method (method 945.18B) (Velp UDK 149, Europe).,The fat level was determined according to the AOAC method (AOAC, 2000AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International 17th ed. 40:1-3.) with 5 g sample using Soxhlet extraction (110 °C) with petroleum ether (method 960.39) (Velp Ser 148, Milan, Italy). The total ash content was determined by gradual temperature increase (250-650 °C) and constant weight maintenance (AOAC, 923.03). The total carbohydrate content was calculated by subtracting other contents from 100% (Rezai et al., 2014Rezai F, Bakhshi D, Ghazvini RF, Majd DJ, Pourghayoumi M. 2014. Evaluation of fatty acid content and nutritional properties of selected native and important hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties grown in Iran. J. Ap. Bot. Food Quality 87, 104-107. ) (1Total carbohydrate=100 %-% moisture+% protein+% fat+% ash).

Total carbohydrate=100 %-% moisture+% protein+% fat+% ash  (1)

The energy value was calculated using the following formula (Fernandes et al., 2019Fernandes I, Fernandes T, Cordeiro N. 2019. Nutritional value and fatty acid profile of two wild edible limpets from the Madeira Archipelago. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245, 895-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03234-y ): (2Energetic value kcal100g=4 x %carbohydrate+%protein+9 x [%lipid]).

Energetic value kcal100g=4 x %carbohydrate+%protein+9 x [%lipid]  (2)

2.4. Vitamin E

 

The vitamin E (tocopherol) composition of the samples was determined using the standard method described in AOCS Ce 8-89 (AOCS, 1997AOCS. 1997. Official Method Ce 8-9. Determination of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols in Vegetable Oils and Fats by HPLC. Campaign, IL: AOCS). One gram of extracted hazelnut oil was diluted with 10 mL hexane and the resulting mixture was injected into the HPLC instrument using a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter. It was analyzed by Shimadzu-Prominence LC-20A under the following HPLC conditions: column: C8 (250×4 mm) 5 µm, flow rate: 1 mL min, mobile phase: Hexane:Isopropyl alcohol (99:1), wavelength: 295 nm, column temperature: 25 °C.

2.5. Total phenolics

 

The total phenolic content was determined by modifying the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Singleton et al., 1965Singleton VL, Rossi JJA. 1965. Colorimetric of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144-158). For analysis, 20 µL of sample extract was taken in a micro cuvette and 1.58 mL of purified water and 100 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent were added. After 5 min, 300 µL of a saturated Na2CO3 solution were added. The solution was stored in a dark place for 2 h. After 2 h, the absorbance of the samples was determined at 760 nm simultaneously in triplicate. A calibration curve was created by using a set of solutions with 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, 250, and 300 mg gallic acid/L concentrations to calculate the results. The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE).

2.6. Color ordinates

 

The color ordinates of the hazelnut kernels were determined by Hunter Lab Color Flex Ez color instrument (HunterLab, USA) as L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness). The colors of the samples were read following calibration to X:79.05, Y:84.02 and Z:89.03 (Mexis and Kontominas, 2009Mexis SF, Kontominas MG. 2009. Effect of γ-irradiation on the physicochemical and sensory properties of cashew nuts (Anacardium occidentale L.). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42, 1501-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.03.023 ). The browning index (BI) was measured based on CIE L*a*b* coordinates, using the following formula (Marzocchi et al., 2017Marzocchi S, Pasini F, Verardo V, Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz H, Caboni MF, Romani S. 2017. Effects of different roasting conditions on physical-chemical properties of Polish hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L. var. Kataloński). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 77, 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.068 ):

BI=100××- 0.310.17  (3)
X=(a*+1.75L)(5.645L+a*-3.021b*)  (4)

2.7. Fatty acid analysis

 

To obtain fatty acid methyl esters (Turan, 2018aTuran A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y ), 0.5 g oil was weighed in Erlenmeyer flasks, and 4 mL of iso-octane and 2 mL of methanolic KOH solution were added, followed by agitation for 30 s. The mixture was stored in a sealed container in a dark place for 6 min; 2 drops of 1% methyl orange indicator were added; and the mixture was then titrated with 1 M HCl solution until a pink color was developed. After it was kept for 15 min, the colorless layer formed on top of the mixture was put into glass vials and analyzed by GC. The composition of fatty acids was determined by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector and TR-CN100 column (60 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.20 µm; Shimadzu GC-2010, Japan). Both injector temperature and detector temperature were set at 250 °C. The sample (1.0 µL) was injected and helium was used as the carrier gas at 200 kPa. The injection was made at a ratio of 1:100. The column temperature was held at 90 °C for 7 min and then increased to 240 °C at 5 °C/min. Finally, it was maintained at 240 °C for 15 min. Fatty acids were characterized by comparison of the FAME mixture consisting of 37 standard components (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mixture, Cat. No. 18919-1AMP, Bellefonte PA, USA) based on their elution times (Turan, 2018bTuran A. 2018b. Effect of drying methods on nut quality of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 4554-4565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3391-8 ). SFA (saturated fatty acid), UFA (unsaturated fatty acid), MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acid), and PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acid) were calculated by the following equations:

SFA=C14:0+C16:0+C17:0+C18:0+C20:0+C22:0  (5)
MUFA=C16:1+C17:1+C18:1+C20:1+C24:1  (6)
PUFA=C18:2+C183  (7)
UFA=MUFA+PUFA  (8)

2.8. Oil oxidation parameters

 

Free fatty acidity (method Ca 5a-40) was determined by the AOCS Standard Method (AOCS, 2004AOCS. 2004. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemist’s Society, 5th ed. American Oil Chemist Society, US), peroxide level (method Cd 8-53) by AOCS (AOCS, 2004AOCS. 2004. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemist’s Society, 5th ed. American Oil Chemist Society, US) (Metrohm, Dosimat 799, Switzerland), and the Rancimat value by the Rancimat 743 device (Metrohm, Switzerland) (Velasco et al., 2004Velasco J, Anderson ML, Skibsted LH. 2004. Evaluation of oxidative stability of vegetable oils by monitoring the tendency to radical formation. A comparison of electron spins resonance spectroscopy with the rancimat method and differential scanning calorimetry. Food Chem. 85, 623-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.020 ). The iodine value (IV) was calculated using the percentage of fatty acids (Belviso et al., 2017Belviso S, Bell BD, Giacosa S, Bertolino M, Ghirardello D Giordano M, Rolle L, Gerbi V, Zeppa G. 2017. Chemical, mechanical and sensory monitoring of hot air and infrared roasted hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) during nine months of storage. Food Chem. 217, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.103 ; Turan, 2019Turan A. 2019. Effect of drying on the chemical composition of Çakıldak (cv) hazelnuts during storage. Grasas Aceites. 70, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0693181 ) (9IV=C16:1×1.901+C18:1×0.899+C18:2×1.814+(C18:3×2.737)).

IV=C16:1×1.901+C18:1×0.899+C18:2×1.814+(C18:3×2.737)  (9)

2.9. Oil quality indices

 

Data from the fatty acid profile analyses was used to evaluate the nutritional composition of the lipid fraction. Three oil quality indices were used: Index of atherogenicity (IA), index of thrombogenicity (IT) and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolenic fatty acid ratio (H/H). The IA (10AI=C12:0+4 x C14:0+C16:0MUFA+FAω6+FAω3) and IT (11TI=C14:0+C16:0+C18:00.5 × MUFA+0.5 × FAω6+(3 × FAω3)) were calculated as described by Bezerra et al., (2017)Bezerra CV, Rodrigues AMC, Olivera PD, Silva DA, Silva LHM. 2017. Technological properties of amazonian oil and fats and their applications in the food industry. Food Chem. 221, 1466-1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.004 .

AI=C12:0+4 x C14:0+C16:0MUFA+FAω6+FAω3  (10)
TI=C14:0+C16:0+C18:00.5 × MUFA+0.5 × FAω6+(3 × FAω3)  (11)

The H/H (12HH=C18:1+C18:2+C20:4+C18:3+C20:5+C22:5+C22:6 C14:0+C16:0) index was determined by Fernandez et al. (2019)Fernandes I, Fernandes T, Cordeiro N. 2019. Nutritional value and fatty acid profile of two wild edible limpets from the Madeira Archipelago. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245, 895-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03234-y .

HH=C18:1+C18:2+C20:4+C18:3+C20:5+C22:5+C22:6 C14:0+C16:0  (12)

2.10. Statistical analysis

 

The experiment was conducted with three replicates based on the randomized block design. Descriptive statistics were determined by SPSS v. 22.0 (Armonk, New York: IBM Corp.). Statistical tests were performed using SAS-JAMP v. 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Statistical differences were determined using the t-test. The differences among the results were determined at the levels of p < 0.05, p ˂ 0.01, and p ˂ 0.001.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

3.1. Proximate composition

 

Tombul hazelnut takes the first place in terms of quality among 18 hazelnut cultivars in Turkey; whereas the other cultivars are regarded secondary with respect to quality (Alaşalvar et al., 2010Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820 ). The kernel of the Tombul cultivar content was determined to comprise 15.01% protein, 59.83% fat, 22.77% carbohydrate, and 2.39% ash by Seyhan et al., (2007)Seyhan F, Özay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alaşalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016 ; 4.63% moisture, 64.60% fat, 17.5% protein, 383.60 mg/100 g vitamin E, and 726.5 mg/100 g total phenolic substance by Köksal et al., (2006)Köksal Aİ, Artik N, Şimşek A, Güneş N. 2006. Nutrient composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey. Food Chem. 99, 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.013 ; 15.35% protein, 61.21% fat, 17.30% carbohydrate, 3.90% moisture, 2.24% ash, and 631 kcal/100g energy by Alaşalvar et al., (2009)Alaşalvar C, Shahidi F, Amaral JS, Oliviera BPP. 2009. Tree Nuts: Compositional characteristics and health effect of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.): An overview. Nut. Sci. Tech. 9, 185-214.; and 61% fat, 16% carbohydrate, 14.9% protein, and 5.3% moisture by Memoli et al., (2017)Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x . In our study, the good kernel (GK) content was determined to contain 4.70% moisture, 54.21% fat, 15.00% protein, 23.91 g/100 g carbohydrate, 2.39% ash, 64.30 mg/kg vitamin E, 196.68 mg GAE/100 g total phenols, and 613.27 kcal/100 g energy (Table 1). Differences between bug-damaged and good kernel values were found to be statistically significant except for humidity (p < 0.001; Table 1). While total fat, ash, vitamin E, and energy values were higher, protein, carbohydrate, and total phenolic contents were lower in GK than in GD samples. Memoli et al., (2017)Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x reported that damage caused by bugs affects the nutrient content of hazelnuts and cimiciate causes significant damage to hazelnuts. This damage is predictably caused by secretion during feeding in the developmental stages of the kernel and delay in growth (Figure 1A). Oil oxidation begins (Figure 1B) in the deformed kernel and changes in nutrient content occur.

TABLE 1.  Effect of green shield bug damage on proximate composition, energetic value, and color ordinates of hazelnuts.
ParametersNut samples Significant level
Green shield bug damageGood kernel
Moisture (%)4.77±0.294.70±0.17ns
Total lipid (%)46.23±0.0154.21±1.41**
Crude protein (%)16.79±0.5315.00±0.03*
Total carbonhyrate (g/100 g) 30.48±0.0123.91±0.01***
Total ashes (%)2.31±0.012.39±0.01***
Vitamin E (mg/kg)61.20±0.0164.30±0.01***
Total phenolics (mg GAE/100g)262.42±0.01196.68±0.01***
Energetic value (kcal/100g)576.31±1.62613.27±11.27**
Colour ordinates
L* (Lightness)58.46±0.0158.85±0.01***
a*(Redness)2.95±0.013.16±0.01***
b*(Yellowness)11.23±0.0110.99±0.01***
Browning index (BI)24.63±0.0124.21±0.01ns

Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate analyses (n=3). Differences were determined using the t-test. Significant level; *, **, *** and “ns” mean significance at p ˂ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and “not significant”, respectively, between green shield bug damage and good kernels.

medium/medium-GYA-72-01-e391-gf1.png
FIGURE 1.  Effect of green sheld bug (Palomena prasina L.) damage on kernels (A, tumor, and/or spot kernel), and initial degree of oxidation (B, yellowing) of hazelnut oil

Color is known to be an important parameter in the evaluation of hazelnuts (Marzocchi et al., 2017Marzocchi S, Pasini F, Verardo V, Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz H, Caboni MF, Romani S. 2017. Effects of different roasting conditions on physical-chemical properties of Polish hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L. var. Kataloński). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 77, 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.068 ; Deng et al., 2018Deng LZ, Yang XH, Mujumdar AS, Zhao JH, Wang D, Zang Q, Wang J, Gao ZJ, Xiao HW. 2018. Red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) drying: Effect of drying methods on drying kinetics, physical properties, antioxidant capacity, and microstructure. Dry. Technol. 36, 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2017.1361439 ). The differences among the color ordinates were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001) except for the browning index (BI), which is presented in Table 1 in detail. It was found that L* and a* levels were higher in the good kernel, whereas the b* level was higher in the bug-damaged nuts. The reason is that oil oxidation begins and progresses at places where bug damage occurs. Therefore, an increase in yellowness (Figure 1B), an indicator of oxidation in nuts, was noted.

3.2. Fatty acid profiles

 

Alaşalvar et al., (2010)Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820 reported that there is a generally high level of MUFA (78.10-87.26%), moderate level of PUFA 83.92-13.86%), and low level of SFA (7.46-9.59%) in hazelnuts, which is consistent with the reports of other studies (Alaşalvar et al., 2006Alaşalvar C, Amaral JS, Shahidi F. 2006. Functional lipid characteristics of Turkish Tombul hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 10177-10183. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061702w ; Turan, 2018aTuran A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y ; Turan, 2019Turan A. 2019. Effect of drying on the chemical composition of Çakıldak (cv) hazelnuts during storage. Grasas Aceites. 70, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0693181 ). It is known that hazelnut oil is preferred over olive, corn, and sunflower oil as it contains a higher level of UFA (Köksal et al., 2006Köksal Aİ, Artik N, Şimşek A, Güneş N. 2006. Nutrient composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey. Food Chem. 99, 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.013 ; Alaşalvar et al., 2010Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820 ) based on the scientific evidence that these fatty acids have a protective effect on the cardiovascular system (Uribe et al., 2018Uribe E, Vega-Galvez A, Garcia V, Pasten A, Lopez J, Goni G. 2018. Effect of drying methods on phytochemical content and amino acid and fatty acid profiles of the green seaweed, Ulva spp. J. Appl. Pycol. 31, 1967-1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1686-9 ).

In our study, a total of 13 fatty acids were determined in the “Tombul” hazelnut, although 8 fatty acids were under the limit of detection (< 0.001%; Table 2). Palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic fatty acids formed the major group; whereas myristic, margaric, arachidic, behenic, palmitoleic, heptadecanoic, eicosenoic, nervonic, and linolenic fatty acids formed the minor group. The fatty acids in the major group formed approximately 99.39% of the total fatty acids; whereas those in the minor group formed approximately 0.6% (Table 2). The effect of bug damage on fatty acid composition was found to be statistically significant except for margaric, behenic, and nervonic fatty acids (p < 0.001), which is presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2.  Effect of green shield bug damage on the fatty acid profiles, sum of fatty acids and oil oxidation of hazelnuts.
Fatty Acids (FA, %)Nut samples Significant level
Green sheild bug damageGood kernels
Caproic acid (C6:0)ndnd
Caprylic acid (C8:0)ndnd
Capric acid (C10:0)ndnd
Lauric acid (C12:0)ndnd
Myristic acid (C14:0)0.04±0.010.03±0.01*
Palmitic acid (C16:0)5.23±0.035.03±0.05**
Margaric acid (C17:0)0.06±0.010.05±0.00ns
Stearic acid (C18:0)2.24±0.011.99±0.02***
Arachidic acid (C20:0)0.09±0.000.12±0.00**
Behenic acid (C22:0)0.04±0.010.05±0.01ns
Lignoceric acid (C24:0)ndnd
Total saturated FA (ƩSFA)7.71±0.037.27±0.05***
Palmitoleic acid (C16:1)0.10±0.000.05±0.00***
Heptadecanoic acid (C17:1)0.08±0.070.05±0.00*
Oleic acid (C18:1)80.32±0.1281.19±0.09***
Eicosenoic acid (C20:1)0.05±0.000.08±0.01*
Erucic acid (22: 1),ndnd
Nervonic acid (C24:1)0.04±0.010.05±0.01ns
Total monounsaturated FA (ƩMUFA)80.59±0.0281.41±0.09***
Linoleic acid (C18:2)11.60±0.0211.12±0.08***
Linolenic acid (C18:3)0.10±0.010.12±0.00**
Eicosadienoic acid (20: 2)ndnd
Docosadienoic acid (22: 2)ndnd
Total polyunsaturated FA (ƩPUFA)11.70±0.0311.24±0.08**
Unsaturated FA (UFA)92.29±0.0492.65±0.05***
Unsaturated/saturated FA (UFA/SFA)11.98±0.0512.74±0.09***
Oil oxidation parameters
Oleic to linoleic acid (O/L)6.93±0.017.30±0.06***
Iodine value (IV)93.71±0.0793.59±0.07ns
Free fatty acid (FFA; %, Oleic acid)2.62±0.330.49±0.04***
Peroxide value (PV, meq O2· kg-1)21.58±0.2215.18±0.20***
Rancimat value (RV, h)5.53±0.018.21±0.01***

Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate analyses (n=3). nd: Not detected (< 0.001%). Differences were determined using the t-test. Significant level; *, **, *** and “ns” mean significance at p ˂ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and “not significant”, respectively, between green shield bug damage and good kernels.

The effect of bug damage on SFA was found to be significant (p < 0.001) at 7.27% in the good kernels and 7.71% in the damaged kernels. As expected, there was a difference in the levels of palmitic and stearic major fatty acids which form the SFA. The primary fatty acid level of MUFA was 81.19% in the good kernels and 80.32% in the bug-damaged kernels. It is known that the primary fatty acid in the PUFA is linoleic acid. The effect of bug damage on linoleic acid was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001; Table 2), with 11.12% in the good kernels and 11.60% in bug-damaged kernels. Telahigue et al., (2019)Telahigue K, Rabeh I, Chetoui I, Bejaoui S, Cafsi ME, Hajji T. 2019. To what extent are hake fat and its oil quality affected by the parasite Lernaeocera lusci? Grasas Aceites 70, e297. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0697181 indicated that pathogens caused a decrease in fatty acids and SFA ranged between 1.82 and 0.41%, MUFA between 0.70 and 0.11% and PUFA between 2.67 and 0.38%. It was reported that this difference in PUFA is caused by the oxidation of linoleic and linolenic fatty acids (Memoli et al., 2017Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x ). Therefore, it should not be consumed in specific diets (Mostafavi et al., 2019Mostafavi S, Asadi-Gharneh HA, Miransari M. 2019. The phytochemical variability of fatty acids in basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by genotype and geographical differences. Food Chem. 276, 700-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.027 ). The effect of bug damage on UFA levels was found to be significant (p < 0.001). It was higher in the good kernels than in the bug-damaged kernels (92.65 and 92.29%, respectively, Table 2). It was reported that diseases and pests have an effect on the UFA/SFA ratio in hazelnuts, with 14.82% in good kernels, 16.13% in cimiciate and 15.96% in mold-effected kernels (Memoli et al., 2017Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x ). In our study, it was also found that bug damage has an impact on the UFA/SFA ratio (p < 0.001). However, it was found to be higher in the good kernels (12.74-11.98%). This difference has probably resulted from the different nutrient contents and/or various types of damage. In addition, it was stated that these differences may have been caused by the interaction of several factors such as altitude, latitude, longitude, temperature, precipitation, cultural practices, harvest time, and drying method (Koyuncu et al., 1997Koyuncu MA, Bostan SZ, Islam A. 1997. Change of fat content and fatty acid composition during the fruit development period in the hazelnuts Tombul and Palaz cultivars grown in Ordu. Acta Hortic. 445, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.445.32 ; Amaral et al., 2006Amaral JS, Casal S, Seabra RM, Olivera BPP. 2006. Effects of roasting on hazelnut lipids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052287v ; Cristofori et al., 2008Cristofori V, Ferramondo S, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2008. Nut and kernel traits and chemical composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars, J. Sci. Food Agric. 88, 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3203 ; Alaşalvar et al., 2010Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820 ; Turan et al., 2018bTuran A. 2018b. Effect of drying methods on nut quality of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 4554-4565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3391-8 ; Mostafavi et al., 2019Mostafavi S, Asadi-Gharneh HA, Miransari M. 2019. The phytochemical variability of fatty acids in basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by genotype and geographical differences. Food Chem. 276, 700-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.027 ).

3.3. Oxidation of hazelnut kernel oil

 

The oleic/linoleic acid ratio (O/L) is one of the essential characteristics used to evaluate the quality of hazelnut kernels, and linoleic acid is more sensitive to oxidation than oleic acid (Turan, 2019Turan A. 2019. Effect of drying on the chemical composition of Çakıldak (cv) hazelnuts during storage. Grasas Aceites. 70, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0693181 ). Therefore, the high O/L ratio indicates resistance to oxidation (Belviso et al., 2017Belviso S, Bell BD, Giacosa S, Bertolino M, Ghirardello D Giordano M, Rolle L, Gerbi V, Zeppa G. 2017. Chemical, mechanical and sensory monitoring of hot air and infrared roasted hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) during nine months of storage. Food Chem. 217, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.103 ; Turan, 2018aTuran A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y ). The effect of bug damage on the O/L ratio was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001, Table 2), and O/L was higher in the good kernels (7.30%). Based on this, it can be concluded that bug damage (Figure 1A) causes oxidation in hazelnuts (Figure 1B). The iodine value (IV) is known as a measure of degree of unsaturation in fats and expressed as the amount of iodine absorbed (Belviso et al., 2017Belviso S, Bell BD, Giacosa S, Bertolino M, Ghirardello D Giordano M, Rolle L, Gerbi V, Zeppa G. 2017. Chemical, mechanical and sensory monitoring of hot air and infrared roasted hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) during nine months of storage. Food Chem. 217, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.103 ; Turan, 2018bTuran A. 2018b. Effect of drying methods on nut quality of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 4554-4565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3391-8 ). In addition, a high value of IV indicates that the content is unstable and more sensitive to oil oxidation. The effect of bug damage on IV was not found to be significant (p > 0.05). However, it was shown that good kernels had a lower level (93.59). In conclusion, it appears that good kernels have a longer shelf-life. Free fatty acids (FFA) are considered to be the first indicator of the lack of quality, and their level above FFA ≥1% indicates spoilage. In our study, there was a remarkable difference between FFA values in the good and bug-damaged kernels (oleic acid: 0.49, 2.62%, respectively, Table 2). Therefore, it can be concluded that bug damage results in oxidation in the nut, and these nuts cannot be purchased. The peroxide value (PV) is one of the crucial characteristics used to indicate the quality of products stored in the hazelnut industry (Turan, 2018aTuran A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y ), and is also considered to be the most important indicator of PV oil oxidation. The effect of bug damage on PV was found to be statistically significant (p ˂ 0.001), which is presented in Table 2 in detail. PV levels were noted as 21.58 meqO2·kg−1 in the bug-damaged kernels and 15.18 meqO2·kg−1 in the good kernels. It was highlighted that bug damage increased oil oxidation in nuts (Figure 1B). The rancimat value (RV) is a characteristic used to determine the shelf-life of hazelnuts (Turan, 2019Turan A. 2019. Effect of drying on the chemical composition of Çakıldak (cv) hazelnuts during storage. Grasas Aceites. 70, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0693181 ). Table 2 shows that the RV value is higher (8.21 h) in the good kernels. Thus, the rancimat value of the nuts is decreased due to bug damage and the shelf-life is expected to be shortened.

3.4. Quality indices

 

Generally, the effect of bug damage on the quality index was found to be significant, which is presented in Table 3 in detail. The effect of bug damage on the PUFA/MUFA ratio was not found to be significant (p > 0.05, Table 3). Consumption of low levels of SFA and high levels of PUFA/SFA is associated with a low risk of heart attack (Chan and Matanjun, 2017Chan PT, Matanjun P. 2017. Chemical composition and physicochemical properties of tropical red seaweed, Gracilaria changii. Food Chem. 221, 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.066 ); therefore, this characteristic is used to determine the quality of the fat fraction in foods. The PUFA/SFA ratio is generally considered to indicate the quality of fats in a diet program (Telahigue et al., 2019Telahigue K, Rabeh I, Chetoui I, Bejaoui S, Cafsi ME, Hajji T. 2019. To what extent are hake fat and its oil quality affected by the parasite Lernaeocera lusci? Grasas Aceites 70, e297. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0697181 ), and values lower than 0.45 are not desirable owing to their ability to increase blood cholesterol. In our study, although the bug damage decreased the PUFA/SFA level, it was determined to be above the threshold (1.52-1.55) and higher in the good kernels (1.55, Table 3). This characteristic was reported to be 1.46 in fish (Telahigue et al., 2019Telahigue K, Rabeh I, Chetoui I, Bejaoui S, Cafsi ME, Hajji T. 2019. To what extent are hake fat and its oil quality affected by the parasite Lernaeocera lusci? Grasas Aceites 70, e297. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0697181 ); therefore, it can be confirmed that its amount is lower in fish than in hazelnuts. In fact, this aspect of the evaluation of hazelnuts suggested that they are a valuable nutrition source for humans. Atherogenicity (AI) and thrombogenicity index (TI) levels should approach zero (Bezerra et al. 2017Bezerra CV, Rodrigues AMC, Olivera PD, Silva DA, Silva LHM. 2017. Technological properties of amazonian oil and fats and their applications in the food industry. Food Chem. 221, 1466-1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.004 ) because this trend represents an increase in anti-atherogenic fatty acids, which has an effect on preventing heart disease. The AI (0.16) and TI (0.15) levels in the good kernels were determined to be lower than those in the bug-damaged kernels. It has been indicated that the H/H ratio is associated with the cholesterol mechanism (Fernandes et al., 2019Fernandes I, Fernandes T, Cordeiro N. 2019. Nutritional value and fatty acid profile of two wild edible limpets from the Madeira Archipelago. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245, 895-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03234-y ) and a higher level of this ratio has a positive effect on human health. In our study, the H/H ratio (18.27) was found to be higher in the good kernels than that in the bug-damaged kernels. Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that bug damage has a negative effect on the nut quality index values. Therefore, in case of bug-damaged hazelnuts being consumed, their expected effect on the cardiovascular system and cholesterol mechanism would not be observed.

TABLE 3.  Effect of green shield bug damage on oil quality indices of hazelnuts.
IndicesNut samples Significant level
Green shield bug damageGood kernels
Polyunsaturated (PUFA)/ Monounsaturated (MUFA)0.15±0.000.14±0.00ns
Polyunsaturated (PUFA)/ Saturated (SFA) 1.52±0.001.55±0.01*
Atherogenicity index (AI)0.23±0.020.16±0.02***
Thrombogenivity index (TI)0.16±0.000.15±0.00*
Hypocholesterolemic/ Hypercholesterolemic (H/H)17.45±0.1118.27±0.16**

Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate analyses (n=3). Differences were determined using the t-test. Significant level; *, **, *** and “ns” mean significance at p ˂ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and “not significant”, respectively, between green shield bug damage and good kernels.

4. CONCLUSIONS

 

To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature regarding the effect of GD on nutrient content, fatty acid composition, oil oxidation, and food quality index of “Tombul” hazelnuts. In this study, the effect of bug damage was found to be statistically significant. Bug damage caused decreased UFA and UFA/SFA ratio levels. In addition, it resulted in lipid oxidation, thereby leading to decreased O/L and RV values and increased IV, FFA, and PV levels. Moreover, this oxidation also caused increased AI and TI levels and a decreased H/H ratio.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

This study was supported by Yavuz Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Giresun, Turkey). The author wishes to thank Associate Prof Fatih ÖNER for the statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

 

Ak K, Tuncer C, Baltacı A, Eser Ü, Saruhan İ. 2018. Indicence and severity of stink bug damage on kernel in Turkish hazelnut orchards. Acta Hortic. 1226, 407-412. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1226.62

Alaşalvar C, Amaral JS, Shahidi F. 2006. Functional lipid characteristics of Turkish Tombul hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 10177-10183. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061702w

Alaşalvar C, Pelvan E, Topal B. 2010. Effect of roasting oil and fatty acid composition of Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637481003691820

Alaşalvar C, Shahidi F, Amaral JS, Oliviera BPP. 2009. Tree Nuts: Compositional characteristics and health effect of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.): An overview. Nut. Sci. Tech. 9, 185-214.

Amaral JS, Casal S, Seabra RM, Olivera BPP. 2006. Effects of roasting on hazelnut lipids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052287v

AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International 17th ed. 40:1-3.

AOCS. 1997. Official Method Ce 8-9. Determination of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols in Vegetable Oils and Fats by HPLC. Campaign, IL: AOCS

AOCS. 2004. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemist’s Society, 5th ed. American Oil Chemist Society, US

Belviso S, Bell BD, Giacosa S, Bertolino M, Ghirardello D Giordano M, Rolle L, Gerbi V, Zeppa G. 2017. Chemical, mechanical and sensory monitoring of hot air and infrared roasted hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) during nine months of storage. Food Chem. 217, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.103

Bezerra CV, Rodrigues AMC, Olivera PD, Silva DA, Silva LHM. 2017. Technological properties of amazonian oil and fats and their applications in the food industry. Food Chem. 221, 1466-1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.004

Bosco L, Moraglio ST, Tavella L. 2018. Halyomorpha halys, a serious threat for hazelnut in newly invaded areas. J. Pest Sci. 91, 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0937-x

Chan PT, Matanjun P. 2017. Chemical composition and physicochemical properties of tropical red seaweed, Gracilaria changii. Food Chem. 221, 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.066

Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits 70, 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025

Cristofori V, Ferramondo S, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2008. Nut and kernel traits and chemical composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars, J. Sci. Food Agric. 88, 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3203

Deng LZ, Yang XH, Mujumdar AS, Zhao JH, Wang D, Zang Q, Wang J, Gao ZJ, Xiao HW. 2018. Red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) drying: Effect of drying methods on drying kinetics, physical properties, antioxidant capacity, and microstructure. Dry. Technol. 36, 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2017.1361439

Erper İ, Saruhan İ, Akça İ, Aksoy HM, Tuncer C. 2016. Evaluation of some entomophogenetic fungi for controlling to green shield bug, Palomena prasina L. (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Egyp. J. Bio. Pest. Cont. 26, 573-578

Fernandes I, Fernandes T, Cordeiro N. 2019. Nutritional value and fatty acid profile of two wild edible limpets from the Madeira Archipelago. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245, 895-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03234-y

Koyuncu MA, Bostan SZ, Islam A. 1997. Change of fat content and fatty acid composition during the fruit development period in the hazelnuts Tombul and Palaz cultivars grown in Ordu. Acta Hortic. 445, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.445.32

Köksal Aİ, Artik N, Şimşek A, Güneş N. 2006. Nutrient composition of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey. Food Chem. 99, 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.013

Marzocchi S, Pasini F, Verardo V, Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz H, Caboni MF, Romani S. 2017. Effects of different roasting conditions on physical-chemical properties of Polish hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L. var. Kataloński). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 77, 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.068

Memoli A, Albanese D, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Crescitelli A, Miatteo MD, Benucci I. 2017. Effect of bug damage and mold contamination on fatty acids and sterols of hazelnut oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2778-x

Mexis SF, Kontominas MG. 2009. Effect of γ-irradiation on the physicochemical and sensory properties of cashew nuts (Anacardium occidentale L.). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42, 1501-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.03.023

Mostafavi S, Asadi-Gharneh HA, Miransari M. 2019. The phytochemical variability of fatty acids in basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by genotype and geographical differences. Food Chem. 276, 700-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.027

Oliveira I, Sousa A, Morais JS, Ferreira ICFR, Bento A, Estevinho L, Pereira JA. 2008. Chemical composition, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of three hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars. Food Chem. Tox. 46, 1801-1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.026

Parcerisa J, Boatella J, Codony R, Rafecas M, Castellote AI, Garcia J, Lopez A, Romero A. 1995. Comparison of fatty acid and triacylglycerol composition of different hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) cultivated in Catalonia (Spain). J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 13-16.

Rezai F, Bakhshi D, Ghazvini RF, Majd DJ, Pourghayoumi M. 2014. Evaluation of fatty acid content and nutritional properties of selected native and important hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties grown in Iran. J. Ap. Bot. Food Quality 87, 104-107.

Saruhan İ, Tuncer C. 2010. Research on damage rate and type of green shield bug (Palomena prasina L. Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on hazelnut. J. Agric. Sci. 25, 75-83

Seyhan F, Özay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alaşalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016

Shahidi F, Alaşalvar C, Liyana-Pathırana CM. 2007. Antioxidant phytochemicals in hazelnut kernel (Corylus avellana L.) and hazelnut by products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 551212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062472o

Singleton VL, Rossi JJA. 1965. Colorimetric of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144-158

Telahigue K, Rabeh I, Chetoui I, Bejaoui S, Cafsi ME, Hajji T. 2019. To what extent are hake fat and its oil quality affected by the parasite Lernaeocera lusci? Grasas Aceites 70, e297. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0697181

Turan A. 2018a. Effect of drying methods on fatty acid profile and oil oxidation of hazelnut oil during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 12, 2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3128-y

Turan A. 2018b. Effect of drying methods on nut quality of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 4554-4565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3391-8

Turan A. 2019. Effect of drying on the chemical composition of Çakıldak (cv) hazelnuts during storage. Grasas Aceites. 70, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0693181

Uribe E, Vega-Galvez A, Garcia V, Pasten A, Lopez J, Goni G. 2018. Effect of drying methods on phytochemical content and amino acid and fatty acid profiles of the green seaweed, Ulva spp. J. Appl. Pycol. 31, 1967-1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1686-9

Velasco J, Anderson ML, Skibsted LH. 2004. Evaluation of oxidative stability of vegetable oils by monitoring the tendency to radical formation. A comparison of electron spins resonance spectroscopy with the rancimat method and differential scanning calorimetry. Food Chem. 85, 623-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.020