Grasas y Aceites 75 (1)
January-March 2024, 2024
ISSN-L: 0017-3495
https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0971231.2024

How does harvest time affect the major fatty acids and bioactive compounds in hazelnut cultivars (Corylus avellana L.)?

¿Cómo afecta el tiempo de cosecha a los principales ácidos grasos y compuestos bioactivos de los cultivares de avellana (Corylus avellana L.)?

H.I. Balık

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-7032

S. Kayalak Balık

Sakarya Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry, Sakarya, Türkiye

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5774-7656

O. Karakaya

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0783-3120

B. Ozturk

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-3942

SUMMARY

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of harvest time on the protein, oil, fatty acids and bioactive compounds in hazelnut cultivars (Corylus avellana L. cvs. ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Çakıldak’, ‘Okay 28’ and ‘Allahverdi’). The harvest was carried out at 7 different periods with weekly intervals from 20 July to 31 August. As the harvest time progressed, increases and decreases were detected in protein, oil, fatty acids and bioactive compounds. The highest oil content was measured in the H5 and H6 harvest periods. The highest content was determined in H3 for oleic acid. Higher total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity were obtained in the first 3 harvest periods than in the other periods. The present findings revealed that the protein, fatty acids and bioactive compounds in hazelnut cultivars may differ according to the harvest time. The results obtained will provide clearer ideas to both the industry and the producers about the optimum harvest time for the intended use of these cultivars.

KEYWORDS: 
Antioxidant; Corylus avellana; Fatty acids; Oleic acid; Phenolics; Protein
RESUMEN

Este estudio se realizó principalmente para investigar los efectos del tiempo de cosecha sobre las proteínas, el aceite, los ácidos grasos y los compuestos bioactivos de cultivares de avellana (Corylus avellana L. cvs. ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Çakıldak’, ‘OK 28’ y ‘Allahverdi’). La cosecha se realizó en 7 periodos diferentes con intervalos semanales del 20 de julio al 31 de agosto. A medida que avanzó la época de cosecha se detectaron aumentos y disminuciones en proteínas, aceite, ácidos grasos y compuestos bioactivos. El mayor contenido de aceite se encontró en los períodos de cosecha H5 y H6. El contenido más alto para el ácido oleico se encontró en H3. Los mayores fenólicos totales, flavonoides totales y actividad antioxidante se obtuvieron en los primeros 3 períodos de cosecha en comparación con los otros períodos. Los hallazgos actuales revelaron que las proteínas, los ácidos grasos y los compuestos bioactivos de los cultivares de avellana pueden diferir según el momento de la cosecha. Los resultados obtenidos proporcionarán ideas más claras tanto a la industria como a los productores sobre el momento óptimo de cosecha para el uso previsto de estos cultivares.

PALABRAS CLAVE: 
Antioxidante; Corylus avellana; Ácidos grasos; Ácido oleico; Fenólicos; Proteínas

Submitted: 13  September  2023; Accepted: 13  October  2023; Published online: 14  March 2024

Citation/Cómo citar este artículo: Balık HI, Kayalak Balık S, Karakaya O, Ozturk B. 2024. How does harvest time affect the major fatty acids and bioactive compounds in hazelnut cultivars (Corylus avellana L.)?. Grasas y Aceites 75 (1), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0971231.2024

CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION

 

The hazelnut is a popular type of fruit which consumers love and consume frequently. More than 90% of the world’s produced hazelnuts are used in the confectionery, chocolate and ice cream industries. Hazelnuts are processed into many kinds of products, including roasted, chopped, sliced, flour, puree, chocolate and paste (Silvestri et al., 2021Silvestri C, Bacchetta L, Bellincontro A, Cristofori V. 2021. Advances in cultivar choice, hazelnut orchard management, and nut storage to enhance product quality and safety: an overview. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10557).

Hazelnuts are rich in dietary fiber, macro-micro elements, vitamins, carbohydrates, proteins, fats, fatty acids, phytosterols, phenolic compounds and antioxidants and are an important part of many countries’ healthy nutrition and diets (Karaosmanoglu and Ustun, 2022Karaosmanoglu H, Ustun NS. 2022. Proximate, mineral composition, color properties of organic and conventional grown hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau. 64, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00634-x). It can prevent or delay the neutralization of free radicals and lipid oxidation due to the protein, fatty acids and phenolic compounds it contains and their antioxidant activities. Thus, hazelnuts play an important role in the treatment and prevention of diseases. The monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in hazelnuts play an important role in lowering cholesterol levels, and the risk of heart disease as well as in alleviating the negative effects of hypertension (Chang et al., 2016Chang SK, Alasalvar C, Bolling BW, Shahidi F. 2016. Nuts and their co-products: The impact of processing (roasting) on phenolics, bioavailability, and health benefits–A comprehensive review. J. Func. Food. 26, 88-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.029; Wani et al., 2020Wani IA, Ayoub A, Bhat NA, Dar AH, Gull A. 2020. Hazelnut. In Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts-Properties and Health Benefits. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2).

Phenolic compounds influence several sensory properties of fruits, including taste, color, aroma, flavor and odor (Haminiuk et al., 2012Haminiuk CW, Maciel GM, Plata-Oviedo MS, Peralta RM. 2012. Phenolic compounds in fruits–an overview. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47, 2023-2044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03067.x). Oils and fatty acids largely designate the quality of a nut species such as hazelnuts (Piscopo et al., 2010Piscopo A, Romeo FV, Petrovicova B, Poiana M. 2010. Effect of the harvest time on kernel quality of several almond varieties (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) DA Webb). Sci. Hortic. 125, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.02.015). Various factors including genetic structure, ecological conditions, technical and cultural practices (irrigation, fertilization, pruning, etc.), diseases and pests, drying and storage conditions and harvest time affect these components in hazelnuts (Balta et al., 2006Balta MF, Yarılgaç T, Aşkın MA, Kuçuk M, Balta F, Özrenk K. 2006. Determination of fatty acid compositions, oil contents and some quality traits of hazelnut genetic resources grown in eastern Anatolia of Turkey. J. Food Compos. Anal. 19, 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.10.007; Pycia et al., 2020Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043; Balık, 2021Balık HI. 2021. Bioactive Compounds and Fatty Acid Composition of New Turkish Hazelnut Cultivars. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 21, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1860182).

It is critical to determine the optimal harvest time in order to minimize quality losses in commercially-grown varieties and provide higher-quality products to consumers. Early or late harvests cause significant yield and quality losses in fruit species (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025). The protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars and minerals in hazelnuts are known to be affected by harvest time and such compounds change with the progress of harvest (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017). Indeed, Pycia et al. (2020)Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043 noted that the antioxidant activity of hazelnuts decreased with the progress of ripening. Furthermore, the phytochemical content in nuts such as almonds (Piscopo et al., 2010Piscopo A, Romeo FV, Petrovicova B, Poiana M. 2010. Effect of the harvest time on kernel quality of several almond varieties (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) DA Webb). Sci. Hortic. 125, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.02.015), walnuts (Wei et al., 2022Wei F, Li Y, Sun D, Chen Q, Fu M, Zhao H, Chen X, Huang Y, Xu H. 2022. Odor, tastes, nutritional compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh-eating walnut during ripening. Sci. Hortic. 293, 110744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110744), pistachios (Kelebek et al., 2020Kelebek H, Sonmezdag AS, Guclu G, Cengiz N, Uzlasir T, Kadiroglu P, Selli S. 2020. Comparison of phenolic profile and some physicochemical properties of Uzun pistachios as influenced by different harvest period. J. Food Process. Preserv. 44, e14605. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14605) and pecans (Bouali et al., 2013Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y) were reported to vary with harvest time.

The majority of the research on the effect of harvest time on hazelnut kernel quality has focused on changes in protein, oil and fatty acids (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017).

There are no previously reported studies on how the protein, fatty acid composition, total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity of Turkish hazelnut varieties varied with harvest time. The main objective in this study was to determine the effect of harvest time on the fatty acid composition and bioactive compounds in new (‘Okay 28’ and ‘Allahverdi’) and commonly grown Turkish hazelnut cultivars. It was hypothesized that harvest time would have a significant effect on these components, and this study is the first to investigate how harvest time affects protein, oil, major fatty acids and bioactive compounds in new Turkish hazelnut cultivars. Prospective outcomes will provide significant contributions to both food industry and hazelnut growers about the optimum harvest time of these cultivars.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

2.1. Plant materials

 

This study was conducted in 2016 and 2017 on the experimental fields of the Hazelnut Research Institute (Giresun, Türkiye) (40° 54’ 31’’ N and 38° 21’ 09’’ E, 5 m altitude). Plant materials consisted of 22-year-old ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Çakıldak’, ‘Allahverdi’ and ‘Okay 28’ hazelnut cultivars (Corylus avellana L.). Hazelnut plants were planted in the ‘Ocak’ system at 3-m row spacing and 3-m plant spacing in each row. Cultural practices (fertilization, irrigation, pruning, etc.) were performed at regular intervals. The soil in the experimental area consisted of clay-loam in texture with a pH of 4.78 and organic matter content of 4.58%. Based on soil analysis results, commercial fertilizer containing 20% nitrogen, 22% phosphorus, 15% potassium, 2.0% magnesium oxide, 0.5% zinc and 0.3% boron was applied to each ‘Ocak’ (5 plants in each Ocak) during the second week of February. About 1 kg of fertilizer was applied to each ‘Ocak’. In the second week of May, 0.5 kg of 26% calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer was applied per ‘Ocak’. Throughout the experiments, pest (powdery mildew, nut weevil and green stink bugs, etc.) and disease control, pruning and weed control were carried out at regular intervals. Figure 1 shows the climate data recorded throughout the experiments.

medium/medium-GYA-75-01-2024-gf1.png
FIGURE 1.  Mean temperature (°C) and rainfall values for the 2016 and 2017 seasons

2.2. Experimental design

 

The experiments were conducted in a randomized-plot experimental design with three replicates for each cultivar and three ‘Ocaks’ (5 plants in each Ocak) in each replicate. Present cultivars were manually harvested at 7 weekly intervals (H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 and H7) from complete kernel growth to complete shell-fill (in all hazelnut cultivars, first harvest was performed July 20 in 2016 and July 24 in 2017). Harvested fruits were manually separated from the husks and sun-dried on a concrete floor until the moisture content dropped to 6%. About 1 kg of whole nuts was used in each replicate from each cultivar for the analyses of each harvest period. The hazelnut shells were cracked and stored at -18 °C until analysis.

2.3. Protein

 

Protein content was determined according to the Kjeldahl method and the amount of nitrogen was calculated from the amount of ammonia. The results were expressed in percentage (%) (Venkatachalam and Sathe, 2006Venkatachalam M, Sathe SK. 2006. Chemical composition of selected edible nut seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 4705-4714. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0606959).

2.4. Oil

 

Oil content was determined according to the Soxhlet extraction method. The results obtained were expressed in percentage (%) (Firestone, 1997Firestone D. 1997. American oil chemists’ society. Official methos and recommended practices. AOCS Press. Illinois.).

2.5. Composition of fatty acids

 

Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared for gas chromatography (GC) analysis from the total oil content of hazelnuts using a modified version of the protocol outlined below. First, 1 mL of oil was added to a tube, followed by 2 mL of H2SO4 (dissolved in 10% Methanol). After incubating for 40 minutes at 57 °C at 140 rpm, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. Then, 1 mL of 2.0% NaHCO3 was added and vortexed, 1 mL of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken for one minute. Finally, the FAME-containing upper hexane layer was transferred to a new tube and stored at -20 °C for GC analysis. The Shimadzu GC-20A (Kyoto, Japan) GC with a flame-ionization detector was used to analyze samples filtered through a 0.2 m nylon membrane. For analysis, a Stabilwax DA column (0.25 mm x 0.25 m 60 m) was used. The carrier gas was nitrogen and the flow rate was 3 mL/min. The initial temperature was set at 100 °C, held for four minutes and then raised to 245 °C (20 °C/min) and held there for 40 minutes. After that, the temperature was raised to 250 °C for five minutes. At 250 °C, a split injection (1:20) was performed. Peaks of fatty acids were defined using reference standards by comparing retention times. Results are expressed in a relative percentage of fatty acids and processed using the GC manufacturer’s “GC Solution” program.

2.6. Sample preparation for bioactive analyses

 

Total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity (according to DPPH and FRAP) were determined in defatted kernel samples. Oil extraction from the kernel samples was performed using the Soxhlet method. About 1 g defatted kernel samples was weighed on a precise balance (±0.01 g) and 10 mL methanol were added. The prepared solution was kept at +4 °C for two days. The solution was then centrifuged for 4 min at 1200 rpm.

2.6.1. Total phenolics
 

Total phenolics were determined by using Folin-Ciocalteu’s chemical according to the method reported by Karakaya et al. (2023)Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8. 500 L of the stock solution were taken out, then 4.2 mL of distilled water, 100 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent, and 2% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) were added. The prepared solution was measured at 760 nm in a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1280, Tokyo, Japan). The results were expressed in g gallic acid equivalent (GAE)·kg-1 dry weight (dw).

2.6.2. Total flavonoids
 

Total flavonoids were determined using the method described by Karakaya et al. (2023)Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8. 500 L of the stock solution were taken, then 3.8 mL of methanol, 0.1 mL of 10% AlCl3.6H2O, and 10% CH3COOK were added. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the samples at a wavelength of 415 nm. The results were expressed in g quercetin equivalent (QE)·kg-1 dw.

2.6.3. Antioxidant activity
 

DPPH assay. DPPH was determined according to the modified method described by Blois et al. (1958)Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 181, 1199-1200.. 2700 µL of ethyl alcohol and 1 mL of 0.26 mM DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazil) solution were added to 300 µL of fruit extract. The prepared samples were measured at 517 nm in the spectrophotometer. The results were expressed in mmol Trolox equivalent (TE)·kg-1 dw.

FRAP assay. FRAP was detected according to the modified method of Benzie and Strain (1996)Benzie IF, Strain JJ. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 239, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292. 150 µL were taken from the stock solution, then 1.1 mL of phosphate buffer and 1.25 mL of potassium ferric cyanide were added. The solution was then supplemented with 1.25 mL of TCA and 0.25 mL of FeCl3.6H2O. The samples were measured at a wavelength of 700 nm in the spectrophotometer. The results were expressed in mmol Trolox equivalent (TE)·kg-1 dw.

2.7. Statistical analysis

 

Data normality was checked with the use of Kolmogorov- Smirnov’s test. Variance homogeneity was checked with the use of Levene’s test. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Experimental data were subjected to variance analysis. Significant means were compared with the use of Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (p ≤ 0.05). Statistical analyses were performed with the use of Minitab® 17 Statistical Software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA).

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

3.1. Protein content

 

The protein contents should be known in order to effectively time the application of nitrogen fertilizers (Wei and Zhai, 2010Wei L, Zhai Q. 2010. The dynamics and correlation between nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium in a hazelnut fruit during its development. Front. Agric. China. 4 (3), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1010-1). Protein content significantly varied with harvest time (p < 0.05). Protein content fluctuated in all cultivars depending on harvest time. Except for ‘Okay 28’ (16.68%), in other cultivars, the highest protein content was determined in the H1 harvest time (16.71% in ‘Tombul,’ 16.88% in ‘Palaz,’ 18.66% in ‘Çakıldak,’ and 17.60% in ‘Allahverdi’). It was also detected in the H5 in ‘Okay 28’. Protein content decreased in general at the final harvest time (H7) as compared to the first harvest time (H1) (Table 1). Ilyasoglu (2015)Ilyasoglu H. 2015. Changes in sterol composition of hazelnut during fruit development. Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2013.837065 and Seyhan et al. (2007)Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016 reported that the protein contents in ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Badem’ and ‘Sivri’ cultivars decreased as the harvest time progressed. Cristofori et al. (2015)Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025, on the other hand, stated that the protein content in the ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ cultivar fluctuated as the harvest time progressed. A decrease was also reported in ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ and ‘Nocchione’ cultivars. The present findings on protein ratio comply with the findings of previous studies.

TABLE 1.  Protein and oil ratio (%) in the investigated hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time (means of 2016 and 2017)
Cultivar/ Harvest time Protein (%)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
Tombul 16.71 az 14.59 de 14.09 e 16.02 b 15.49 c 15.68 bc 14.73 d
Palaz 16.88 a 14.49 d 14.19 d 15.77 bc 13.24 e 15.46 c 15.99 b
Çakıldak 18.66 a 16.52 c 17.51 b 15.85 d 18.15 a 16.41 c 16.22 cd
Okay 28 15.32 b 15.66 b 16.25 a 15.59 b 16.68 a 13.79 d 14.40 c
Allahverdi 17.60 a 17.51 a 15.26 d 14.62 e 16.75 b 15.94 c 16.75 b
Oil (%)
Tombul 59.73 d 64.97 b 67.05 a 61.69 c 63.41 bc 67.58 a 68.66 a
Palaz 57.90 d 66.99 ab 65.51 bc 55.84 e 68.65 a 66.74 b 64.06 c
Çakıldak 52.78 e 58.49 d 58.83 cd 66.40 a 60.49 bc 64.68 a 61.65 b
Okay 28 58.29 d 58.18 d 59.39 d 69.10 a 69.86 a 65.90 b 64.04 c
Allahverdi 56.09 e 63.68 b 63.46 b 65.03 ab 65.78 a 60.91 c 58.28 d

zMeans indicated by the same letter in the same line do not differ according to the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
n= 9 for the protein and oil content (three replicates × three different measurements for each replicate)

3.2. Oil percentage

 

The period in which hazelnut kernels have maximum oil levels is critical for detecting the optimal harvest time (Bouali et al., 2013Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y). Harvest time had a significant effect on the oil contents in the investigated hazelnut cultivars (p < 0.05). All cultivars had fluctuating oil contents with harvest times. The highest oil contents were determined in the H7 in ‘Tombul’ (68.66%), in the H4 in ‘Çakıldak’ (66.40%); in the H5 in ‘Palaz’ (68.65%), ‘Okay 28’ (69.86%) and ‘Allahverdi’ (65.78%) (Table 1). Although oil contents fluctuated with harvest times, they generally increased as maturation progressed. Reserve lipid formation at the final stage of fruit maturation resulted in high oil contents. However, due to lipids being synthesized during the early stages of kernel development in nut species and being used to form new fruit tissues, oil accumulation during the first stage of kernel development may be lower (Bouali et al., 2013Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y). Consistent with the present findings, it was reported that oil level increased during the kernel development of the cultivars ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’ and ‘Sivri’ cultivars (Ilyasoglu, 2015Ilyasoglu H. 2015. Changes in sterol composition of hazelnut during fruit development. Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2013.837065). Similar findings were reported for ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’ and ‘Badem’ cultivars (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016), ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’, ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ and ‘Nocchione’ cultivars (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025).

3.3. The composition of main fatty acids

 

Hazelnut oil is a good source of food which is enjoyed by consumers. Oleic acid is the main fatty acid in hazelnut oil, followed by linoleic, palmitic and stearic acids. These fatty acids account for 98-99% of the total fatty acids in hazelnuts, with other fatty acids found in trace amounts (Balta et al., 2006Balta MF, Yarılgaç T, Aşkın MA, Kuçuk M, Balta F, Özrenk K. 2006. Determination of fatty acid compositions, oil contents and some quality traits of hazelnut genetic resources grown in eastern Anatolia of Turkey. J. Food Compos. Anal. 19, 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.10.007; Karaosmanoglu and Ustun, 2021Karaosmanoglu H, Ustun NS. 2021. Fatty acids, tocopherol and phenolic contents of organic and conventional grown hazelnuts. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 23, 167-177.; Karakaya et al., 2023Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8). Human diets should have a high oleic acid content and low-density lipoprotein lowers cholesterol levels (Wani et al., 2020Wani IA, Ayoub A, Bhat NA, Dar AH, Gull A. 2020. Hazelnut. In Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts-Properties and Health Benefits. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2). Several factors including variety, ecological conditions, cultural practices, and harvest time affect the fatty acids in hazelnuts (Balta et al., 2006Balta MF, Yarılgaç T, Aşkın MA, Kuçuk M, Balta F, Özrenk K. 2006. Determination of fatty acid compositions, oil contents and some quality traits of hazelnut genetic resources grown in eastern Anatolia of Turkey. J. Food Compos. Anal. 19, 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.10.007; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Balık, 2021Balık HI. 2021. Bioactive Compounds and Fatty Acid Composition of New Turkish Hazelnut Cultivars. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 21, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1860182).

The effects of harvest time on the oleic acid content in hazelnut cultivars were found to be significant (p < 0.05). The oleic acid contents in the cultivars fluctuated (in the form of an increase-decrease-increase) with harvest time. The highest oleic acid contents were determined in the H3 in the ‘Tombul’ (79.75%), ‘Palaz’ (81.87%), ‘Çakıldak’ (82.13%) and ‘Okay 28’ (82.63%) cultivars. However, it was also detected in the H4 in ‘Allahverdi’ (80.03%). The oleic acid contents in the ‘Tombul’ and ‘Allahverdi’ cultivars increased at the last harvest time (H7) as compared to the first harvest time (H1). In contrast, it decreased in ‘Palaz’ and ‘Okay 28’ cultivars (Table 2). The stearic acid contents in ‘Palaz’ and ‘Okay 28’ cultivars increased, while their oleic acid contents decreased with the progress of harvest time. This can be explained by the conversion of oleic acid to stearic acid by Δ9-stearoyl-ACP from desaturase enzymes (Salas et al., 2000Salas JJ, Sánchez J, Ramli US, Manaf AM, Williams M, Harwood JL. 2000. Biochemistry of lipid metabolism in olive and other oil fruits. Prog. Lipid Res. 39, 151-180.). Again, the decrease in oleic acid content in these cultivars may be related to oleic acid conversion into linoleic acid. Temperature has a direct effect on the activity of the 9-stearoyl-ACP desaturase enzyme, which converts oleic acid into linoleic acid (Bouali et al., 2013Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y). In fact, higher linoleic acid content was determined in these cultivars at the last harvest time (H7) as compared to the first harvest time (H1). Similarly, Cristofori et al. (2015)Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025 reported that the effect of harvest time on oleic acid in hazelnut varies by variety. They noted an increase-decrease in oleic acid content in ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ cultivar as the harvest progressed, as well as a decrease-increase in ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ and ‘Nocchione’ cultivars. Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz et al. (2015)Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz H, Pasini F, Verardo V, Bryś J, Koczoń P, Caboni MF. 2015. Changes of the lipid fraction during fruit development in hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) grown in Poland. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400345 stated similar results for oleic acid content in the ‘Katalonski’ hazelnut cultivar. In contrast to present findings, Seyhan et al. (2007)Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016 and Ilyasoglu (2016)Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017 reported increasing oleic acid contents for ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Badem’ and ‘Sivri’ cultivars as harvest time progressed.

TABLE 2.  Oleic and linoleic acid contents (%) in the investigated hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time (means of 2016 and 2017)
Cultivars/ Harvest time Oleic acid (%)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
Tombul 72.57 bz 79.55 a 79.75 a 78.47 a 78.31 a 79.48 a 78.88 a
Palaz 80.64 a 80.75 a 81.87 a 74.93 b 80.95 a 80.28 a 78.55 ab
Çakıldak 79.11 c 77.16 e 82.13 a 80.48 b 76.35 f 78.31 d 79.11 c
Okay 28 82.05 ab 80.43 c 82.63 a 79.84 c 79.98 c 80.98 bc 80.51 c
Allahverdi 72.83 bc 76.49 ab 76.56 ab 80.03 a 77.97 a 68.43 c 75.88 ab
Linoleic acid (%)
Tombul 7.35 c 8.54 bc 8.97 bc 10.95 a 9.51 ab 9.06 abc 9.66 ab
Palaz 8.30 c 7.76 c 6.73 d 11.12 a 6.82 d 8.04 c 9.36 b
Çakıldak 10.38 b 11.63 a 7.46 d 7.97 c 11.47 a 10.28 b 11.43 a
Okay 28 7.04 c 8.72 a 7.06 c 7.62 b 8.38 a 8.38 a 7.85 b
Allahverdi 16.54 a 11.77 bc 12.62 b 9.54 d 10.09 cd 15.32 a 12.49 b

zMeans indicated by the same letter in the same line do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
n= 9 for the oleic and linoleic content (three replicates × three different measurements for each replicate)

The linoleic acid contents in the investigated hazelnut cultivars varied with harvest time (p < 0.05). The highest linoleic acid was determined in the H4 in ‘Tombul’ (10.95%) and ‘Palaz’ (11.12%); in the H2 in ‘Çakıldak’ (11.63%) and ‘Okay 28’ (8.72%); in the H1 in ‘Allahverdi’ (16.54%). Except for ‘Allahverdi’, linoleic acid content was higher in other cultivars at the last harvest time (H7) as compared to the first harvest time (H1) (Table 2). Different researchers reported that linoleic acid content decreased-increased in ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ and ‘Palaz’ cultivars (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025) as the harvest progressed; decreased in ‘Tombul’, ‘Badem’, ‘Sivri’ and ‘Katalonski’ cultivars (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz et al., 2015Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz H, Pasini F, Verardo V, Bryś J, Koczoń P, Caboni MF. 2015. Changes of the lipid fraction during fruit development in hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) grown in Poland. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400345; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017); and increased in ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ and ‘Nocchione’ cultivars (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025). The linoleic acid content in the present cultivars was similar to that reported for ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ and ‘Palaz’ cultivars (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025). However, it was stated that the effect of harvest time on linoleic acid content in hazelnuts may vary depending on the cultivar (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017).

While the effect of harvest time on palmitic acid was significant in ‘Tombul’ and ‘Okay 28’ cultivars, it was insignificant in the other cultivars (p < 0.05). Palmitic acid contents fluctuated in ‘Tombul’ and ‘Okay 28’ cultivars with harvest time. The highest palmitic acid contents were determined in the H3 in ‘Tombul’ (7.75%); and in the H2 in ‘Okay 28’ (7.82%). It increased in ‘Tombul’ at the last harvest (H7) as compared to the first harvest (H1); while it decreased in ‘Okay 28’ (Table 3). Such a decrease in ‘Okay 28’ cultivar can be explained by the fact that palmitic acid was the primary product of the fatty acid synthesis pathway and thus other fatty acids in the kernels were derived from palmitic acid (Bouali et al., 2013Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y). Furthermore, different researchers reported that the palmitic acid contents in ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’, ‘Badem’, ‘Sivri’, ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ and ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ cultivars decreased as harvest time progressed (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017). In ‘Nocchione’ and ‘Katalonski’ cultivars, on the other hand, it showed a decrease-increase (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz et al., 2015Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz H, Pasini F, Verardo V, Bryś J, Koczoń P, Caboni MF. 2015. Changes of the lipid fraction during fruit development in hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) grown in Poland. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400345). In the current study, similar to results reported for ‘Nocchione’ and ‘Katalonski’ cultivars, palmitic acid content fluctuated (increase-decrease or decrease-increase) depending on cultivar as harvest time progressed.

TABLE 3.  Palmitic and stearic acid contents (%) in the investigated hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time (means of 2016 and 2017)
Cultivars/ Harvest time Palmitic acid (%)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
Tombul 6.83 bz 7.29 ab 7.75 a 7.26 ab 7.28 ab 7.33 ab 7.36 ab
Palaz 7.47 a 7.44 a 7.59 a 6.67 a 7.84 a 7.42 a 7.48 a
Çakıldak 8.00 a 7.50 a 7.35 a 7.42 a 7.66 a 7.65 a 7.26 a
Okay 28 7.48 b 7.82 a 7.32 bc 7.54 b 7.18 cd 7.13 cd 7.07 d
Allahverdi 7.26 a 7.24 a 7.23 a 7.06 a 7.25 a 6.79 a 7.33 a
Stearic acid (%)
Tombul 1.55 d 4.44 ab 3.49 c 3.28 c 4.91 a 3.93 bc 4.11 abc
Palaz 3.54 a 3.72 a 3.62 a 1.83 b 4.04 a 3.96 a 4.30 a
Çakıldak 2.48 e 3.27 cd 3.01 d 3.87 ab 4.21 a 3.51 bc 1.85 f
Okay 28 3.81 cd 2.99 e 2.97 e 4.72 a 4.22 bc 3.45 d 4.39 ab
Allahverdi 3.31 d 4.24 ab 3.59 cd 3.33 d 4.46 a 4.00 bc 3.99 bc

zMeans indicated by the same letter in the same line do not differ according to the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
n= 9 for the palmitic and stearic content (three replicates × three different measurements for each replicate)

The effects of harvest time on the stearic acid content in the investigated hazelnut cultivars were found to be significant (p < 0.05). With the exception of the ‘Çakıldak’ cultivar, the stearic acid content in the other cultivars fluctuated with harvest time. It increased up to the H5 harvest time in the ‘Çakıldak’ cultivar, then decreased. The highest stearic acid contents were seen in H5 in ‘Tombul’ (4.91%), ‘Çakıldak’ (4.21%) and ‘Allahverdi’ (4.46%); in H7 in ‘Palaz’ (4.30%); in H4 in ‘Okay 28’ (4.72%). Except for ‘Çakıldak’ cultivar, the other cultivars had significantly higher stearic acid contents at the last harvest (H7) than at the first harvest (H1) (Table 3). The stearic acid contents in the different hazelnut varieties were reported to vary depending on the variety as harvest progressed (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016; Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017). Stearic acid contents were determined to increase as harvest time progressed in the ‘Tombul’, ‘Palaz’ and ‘Badem’ cultivars (Seyhan et al., 2007Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016); while they decreased in ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ and ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ cultivars. It was also determined that stearic acid contents decreased-increased in ‘Nocchione’ (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025) and ‘Katalonski’ cultivars (Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz et al., 2015Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz H, Pasini F, Verardo V, Bryś J, Koczoń P, Caboni MF. 2015. Changes of the lipid fraction during fruit development in hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) grown in Poland. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400345) and increased-decreased in the ‘Palaz’ cultivar (Ilyasoglu, 2016Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017).

3.4. Total phenolics and total flavonoids

 

Hazelnut phenolics protect kernels from oxidation and affect flavor formation in fresh hazelnuts (Delgado et al., 2010Delgado T, Malheiro R, Pereira JA, Ramalhosa E. 2010. Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) kernels as a source of antioxidants and their potential in relation to other nuts. Ind Crops and Prod. 32, 621-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.08.009). Many researchers have reported that phenolic compounds with antioxidant properties may have a positive effect on human health (Karaosmanoglu and Ustun, 2021Karaosmanoglu H, Ustun NS. 2021. Fatty acids, tocopherol and phenolic contents of organic and conventional grown hazelnuts. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 23, 167-177.). Hazelnuts have high antioxidant capacity (Chang et al., 2016Chang SK, Alasalvar C, Bolling BW, Shahidi F. 2016. Nuts and their co-products: The impact of processing (roasting) on phenolics, bioavailability, and health benefits–A comprehensive review. J. Func. Food. 26, 88-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.029). Therefore, consumers prefer hazelnuts with high phenolic compound levels. However, phenolic compounds in hazelnut can be influenced by a variety of factors, including cultivar, environmental conditions, cultural practices and harvest time (Pycia et al., 2020Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043; Balık, 2021Balık HI. 2021. Bioactive Compounds and Fatty Acid Composition of New Turkish Hazelnut Cultivars. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 21, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1860182; Karakaya et al., 2023Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8).

The total phenolics in the present hazelnut cultivars were significantly affected by harvest time (p < 0.05). Except for ‘Okay 28’ and ‘Allahverdi’ cultivars, the total phenolics in the other cultivars fluctuated with harvest time and generally decreased after the H3 stage. They decreased up to H5 in the ‘Okay 28’ cultivar and then fluctuated. They increased up to H3 in the ‘Allahverdi’ cultivar, then decreased. The highest total phenolics were seen in H2 in ‘Tombul’ (14.74 g GAE·kg-1); in H3 in ‘Palaz’ (15.54 g GAE·kg-1), ‘Çakıldak’ (20.62 g GAE·kg-1) and ‘Allahverdi’ (18.38 g GAE·kg-1); in H1 in ‘Okay 28’ (21.28 g GAE·kg-1) (Table 4).

TABLE 4.  Total phenolic (g GAE·kg-1) and total flavonoid (g QE·kg-1) contents in the investigated hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time (mean of 2016 and 2017)
Cultivars/ Harvest time Total phenolics (g GAE·kg-1)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
Tombul 13.92 bz 14.74 a 13.35 c 8.71 d 3.88 e 4.06 e 2.36 f
Palaz 14.58 b 11.97 c 15.54 a 7.27 d 4.95 e 4.71 f 2.37 g
Çakıldak 20.20 b 18.63 c 20.62 a 14.36 e 16.48 d 10.19 g 12.49 f
Okay 28 21.28 a 16.89 b 14.52 c 5.40 e 14.42 c 6.75 d 3.50 f
Allahverdi 12.04 c 12.74 b 18.38 a 8.98 d 6.72 f 7.65 e 5.87 g
Total flavonoids (g QE·kg -1 )
Tombul 1.65 c 3.56 a 3.16 b 1.60 c 1.15 d 0.86 e 0.80 e
Palaz 2.42 b 2.85 a 1.86 c 0.87 f 1.06 e 1.38 d 0.88 f
Çakıldak 3.24 a 2.02 b 3.15 a 2.01 b 1.84 c 1.82 c 3.16 a
Okay 28 4.91 a 2.59 b 2.38 c 1.25 e 1.02 f 1.69 d 1.19 e
Allahverdi 3.38 a 1.59 d 2.75 b 1.80 c 1.07 e 1.60 d 1.00 e

zMeans indicated by the same letter in the same line do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
n= 9 for the total phenolics and total flavonoids content (three replicates × three different measurements for each replicate)

Changes in total flavonoids with harvest time were significant for all cultivars (p < 0.05). Except for the ‘Tombul’ and ‘Okay 28’ cultivars, the total flavonoids in the other cultivars fluctuated with harvest time. In the ‘Tombul’ cultivar, it decreased after H2. It decreased up to H6 in the ‘Okay 28’ cultivar. The highest total flavonoid contents were determined for the H2 in ‘Tombul’ (3.56 g QE·kg-1) and ‘Palaz’ (2.85 g QE·kg-1), and for H1 in ‘Çakıldak’ (3.24 g QE·kg-1), ‘Okay 28’ (4.91 g QE·kg-1) and ‘Allahverdi’ (3.38 g QE·kg-1). Total flavonoids were generally higher at the first harvest (H1) than at the last harvest (H7), except for the ‘Çakıldak’ cultivar (Table 4).

Overall, total phenolics in the cultivars significantly decreased at the last harvest (H7) as compared to the first harvest (H1). This has been associated with an increase in polyphenol oxidase activity during fruit ripening (Parr and Bolwell, 2000Parr AJ, Bolwell GP. 2000. Phenols in the plant and in man. The potential for possible nutritional enhancement of the diet by modifying the phenols content or profile. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 985-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097). Again, the decrease in phenolic contents in fruits as harvest time progresses is explained by the condensation of different phenolic acids during these periods, followed by the formation of complex phenolic compounds such as tannins and lignin (Ben-Ahmed et al., 2009Ben Ahmed C, Ben Rouina B, Sensoy S, Boukhriss M. 2009. Saline water irrigation effects on fruit development, quality, and phenolic composition of virgin olive oils, cv. Chemlali. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 2803-2811. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8034379). Furthermore, ripe fruits have lower total phenolic contents than semi-ripe fruits (Yang et al., 2011Yang J, Gadi R, Thomson T. 2011. Antioxidant capacity, total phenols, and ascorbic acid content of noni (Morinda citrifolia) fruits and leaves at various stages of maturity. Micronesica, 41, 167-176.). Indeed, many researchers reported the highest total phenolic contents in early-harvested walnut fruit (Wei et al., 2022Wei F, Li Y, Sun D, Chen Q, Fu M, Zhao H, Chen X, Huang Y, Xu H. 2022. Odor, tastes, nutritional compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh-eating walnut during ripening. Sci. Hortic. 293, 110744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110744). Cristofori et al. (2015)Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025 stated that total phenolic contents fluctuated (decrease-increase) in ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ and increased in ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ and ‘Nocchione’, depending on the harvest time. In terms of total phenolics, the present findings were compatible with those obtained from the ‘Tonda Gentile Romana’ cultivar. Similarly, total phenolics were observed to decrease as harvest progressed in walnuts (Pycia et al., 2019Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2019. Impact of the degree of maturity of walnuts (Juglans regia L.) and their variety on the antioxidant potential and the content of tocopherols and polyphenols. Molecules. 24, 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162936) and pistachios (Kelebek et al., 2020Kelebek H, Sonmezdag AS, Guclu G, Cengiz N, Uzlasir T, Kadiroglu P, Selli S. 2020. Comparison of phenolic profile and some physicochemical properties of Uzun pistachios as influenced by different harvest period. J. Food Process. Preserv. 44, e14605. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14605). However, some studies showed that the polyphenol concentration in hazelnuts increased as they ripened (Persic et al., 2018Persic M, Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Solar A, Veberic R. 2018. Changes in phenolic profiles of red-colored pellicle walnut and hazelnut kernel during ripening. Food Chem. 252, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.124). Furthermore, different researchers reported that climate conditions, variety, harvest time, biotic and abiotic stress factors may influence total the phenolics in hazelnuts (Cristofori et al., 2015Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025; Pycia et al., 2020Salas JJ, Sánchez J, Ramli US, Manaf AM, Williams M, Harwood JL. 2000. Biochemistry of lipid metabolism in olive and other oil fruits. Prog. Lipid Res. 39, 151-180.; Karakaya et al., 2023Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8).

3.5. Antioxidant activity

 

High antioxidant capacity of fruits is mostly linked to health benefits. Chang et al. (2016)Chang SK, Alasalvar C, Bolling BW, Shahidi F. 2016. Nuts and their co-products: The impact of processing (roasting) on phenolics, bioavailability, and health benefits–A comprehensive review. J. Func. Food. 26, 88-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.029 reported that antioxidant capacity is related to the fruits’ total phenolic contents. The antioxidant activity (both DPPH and FRAP) of the investigated hazelnut cultivars was significantly affected by harvest time (p < 0.05). According to the DPPH test, while the antioxidant activity fluctuated with the harvest time in ‘Palaz’, it decreased in ‘Çakıldak’ and ‘Okay 28’ from the first harvest time (H1). It decreased after H2 in ‘Tombul’. It increased up to H3 in ‘Allahverdi’ and then decreased. The highest antioxidant activities were found in H2 in ‘Tombul’ (34.18 mmol TE·kg-1), in H1 in ‘Çakıldak’ (35.34 mmol TE·kg-1) and ‘Okay 28’ (35.13 mmol TE·kg-1), in H3 in ‘Palaz’ (33.52 mmol TE·kg-1) and ‘Allahverdi’ (31.07 mmol TE·kg-1) (Table 5). According to the FRAP test, antioxidant activity fluctuated depending on harvest time in ‘Tombul’, ‘Çakıldak’ and ‘Allahverdi’, while it decreased in ‘Palaz’ and ‘Okay 28’. The highest antioxidant activities were determined in H2 in ‘Tombul’ (60.47 mmol TE·kg-1); in H1 in ‘Palaz’ (52.45 mmol TE·kg-1) and ‘Okay 28’ (77.16 mmol TE·kg-1), in H3 in ‘Çakıldak’ (72.71 mmol TE·kg-1) and ‘Allahverdi’ (55.14 mmol TE·kg-1) (Table 5).

TABLE 5.  Antioxidant activity (mmol TE·kg-1) (according to DPPH and FRAP assays) of the investigated hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time (means of 2016 and 2017)
Cultivars/ Harvest time DPPH (mmol TE·kg-1)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
Tombul 33.48 abz 34.18 a 32.19 b 26.97 c 15.31 de 16.13 d 13.71 e
Palaz 25.72 b 23.24 c 33.52 a 15.75 d 16.64 d 15.11 d 13.05 e
Çakıldak 35.34 a 34.17 a 33.90 a 31.71 b 28.02 c 25.74 d 20.77 e
Okay 28 35.13 a 29.79 b 28.40 b 20.00 c 12.58 e 15.76 d 12.96 e
Allahverdi 16.98 d 24.50 b 31.07 a 20.87 c 17.53 d 15.81 de 14.30 e
FRAP (mmol TE·kg -1 )
Tombul 52.75 b 60.47 a 49.31 c 31.34 d 8.42 e 10.34 e 10.07 e
Palaz 52.45 a 51.36 a 48.62 b 16.12 c 14.74 cd 13.18 d 13.28 d
Çakıldak 68.81 a 71.20 a 72.71 a 56.03 b 62.68 c 37.08 d 35.26 d
Okay 28 77.16 a 72.44 b 45.70 c 18.27 d 11.67 e 20.76 d 8.74 e
Allahverdi 39.44 c 36.44 b 55.14 a 27.77 d 16.90 f 20.94 e 11.95 g

zMeans indicated by the same letter in the same line do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
n= 9 for the antioxidant activity (three replicates × three different measurements for each replicate)

According to both methods, the antioxidant activity of the cultivars decreased significantly at the last harvest time (H7) compared to the first harvest time (H1). Similarly, many researchers reported that the antioxidant activity of hazelnuts and walnuts decreased as harvest time progressed (Pycia et al., 2020Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043; Wei et al., 2022Wei F, Li Y, Sun D, Chen Q, Fu M, Zhao H, Chen X, Huang Y, Xu H. 2022. Odor, tastes, nutritional compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh-eating walnut during ripening. Sci. Hortic. 293, 110744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110744). In the current study, antioxidant activity decreased as the harvest time progressed due to a decrease in total phenolics and flavonoids. Indeed, a decrease in antioxidant activity during fruit ripening may be related to a decrease in total phenolic compounds (Pycia et al., 2020Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043).

3.6. Principal component analysis (PCA)

 

According to PCA results, the correlation between the investigated traits was 69.1% (PC1 + PC2). Tombul, Palaz and Okay 28 cultivars were associated with oil and stearic acid and were located in the first region in the PCA plane with the H5 harvest time. The Çakıldak cultivar was related to protein and was grouped in the fourth region with the H1 harvest time. The Allahverdi cultivar was associated with linoleic acid and was located in the third region with the H4, H6, and H7 harvest times. Furthermore, bioactive compounds were clustered at the same point in the PCA plane. Protein, oil and fatty acids were also located at different points (Figure 2).

medium/medium-GYA-75-01-2024-gf2.png
FIGURE 2.  Relationships amongst protein oil, bioactive compounds and fatty acid composition in the investigated hazelnut cultivars based on harvest time.

4. CONCLUSIONS

 

Depending on harvest time, the present cultivars yielded different results in terms of protein, oil, major fatty acids, total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity. The investigated parameters were significantly affected by harvest time. In general, the investigated parameters fluctuated with harvest time. The oil rate increased significantly at the last harvest (H7) as compared to the first harvest (H1); while the protein contents decreased. The major fatty acids of some cultivars increased; while they decreased in others. Bioactive compounds decreased as harvest time progressed. In short, the present findings on the protein, oil, fatty acids and bioactive compounds of hazelnut cultivars depending on harvest time will provide clearer ideas for both industry and producers about the optimal harvest time for the intended use of these cultivars. The present findings are also important in terms of minimizing quality losses that may occur during the harvest and storage of hazelnuts and providing a higher quality product to the consumer.

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

The authors acknowledge the Hazelnut Research Institute (Giresun, Türkiye) for providing hazelnut samples.

6. DATA AVAILABILITY

 

Since this article already contains all newly created data, data sharing is not applicable to it.

7. DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST

 

The authors of this article declare that they have no financial, professional or personal conflicts of interest that could have inappropriately influenced this work.

8. REFERENCES

 

Balık HI. 2021. Bioactive Compounds and Fatty Acid Composition of New Turkish Hazelnut Cultivars. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 21, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1860182

Balta MF, Yarılgaç T, Aşkın MA, Kuçuk M, Balta F, Özrenk K. 2006. Determination of fatty acid compositions, oil contents and some quality traits of hazelnut genetic resources grown in eastern Anatolia of Turkey. J. Food Compos. Anal. 19, 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.10.007

Ben Ahmed C, Ben Rouina B, Sensoy S, Boukhriss M. 2009. Saline water irrigation effects on fruit development, quality, and phenolic composition of virgin olive oils, cv. Chemlali. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 2803-2811. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8034379

Benzie IF, Strain JJ. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 239, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292

Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 181, 1199-1200.

Bouali I, Trabelsi H, Abdallah IB, Albouchi A, Martine L, Grégoire S, Bouzaien G, Gandour M, Boukhchina S, Berdeaux O. 2013. Changes in fatty acid, tocopherol and xanthophyll contents during the development of Tunisian-grown pecan nuts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 90, 1869-1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-013-2340-y

Chang SK, Alasalvar C, Bolling BW, Shahidi F. 2016. Nuts and their co-products: The impact of processing (roasting) on phenolics, bioavailability, and health benefits–A comprehensive review. J. Func. Food. 26, 88-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.029

Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz H, Pasini F, Verardo V, Bryś J, Koczoń P, Caboni MF. 2015. Changes of the lipid fraction during fruit development in hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) grown in Poland. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400345

Cristofori V, Bertazza G, Bignami C. 2015. Changes in kernel chemical composition during nut development of three Italian hazelnut cultivars. Fruits. 70, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015025

Delgado T, Malheiro R, Pereira JA, Ramalhosa E. 2010. Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) kernels as a source of antioxidants and their potential in relation to other nuts. Ind Crops and Prod. 32, 621-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.08.009

Firestone D. 1997. American oil chemists’ society. Official methos and recommended practices. AOCS Press. Illinois.

Haminiuk CW, Maciel GM, Plata-Oviedo MS, Peralta RM. 2012. Phenolic compounds in fruits–an overview. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47, 2023-2044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03067.x

Ilyasoglu H. 2015. Changes in sterol composition of hazelnut during fruit development. Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2013.837065

Ilyasoğlu H. 2016. Changes in fatty acid composition of hazelnut during fruit development. J. Food. 41, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD16017

Karakaya O, Yaman İ, Kırkaya H, Uzun S, Kaya T, Balta MF. 2023. Effect of cluster drop intensity on nut traits, biochemical properties, and fatty acids composition in the ‘Çakıldak’ hazelnut cultivar. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 65, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00774-8

Karaosmanoglu H, Ustun NS. 2021. Fatty acids, tocopherol and phenolic contents of organic and conventional grown hazelnuts. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 23, 167-177.

Karaosmanoglu H, Ustun NS. 2022. Proximate, mineral composition, color properties of organic and conventional grown hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau. 64, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00634-x

Kelebek H, Sonmezdag AS, Guclu G, Cengiz N, Uzlasir T, Kadiroglu P, Selli S. 2020. Comparison of phenolic profile and some physicochemical properties of Uzun pistachios as influenced by different harvest period. J. Food Process. Preserv. 44, e14605. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14605

Parr AJ, Bolwell GP. 2000. Phenols in the plant and in man. The potential for possible nutritional enhancement of the diet by modifying the phenols content or profile. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 985-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097

Persic M, Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Solar A, Veberic R. 2018. Changes in phenolic profiles of red-colored pellicle walnut and hazelnut kernel during ripening. Food Chem. 252, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.124

Piscopo A, Romeo FV, Petrovicova B, Poiana M. 2010. Effect of the harvest time on kernel quality of several almond varieties (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) DA Webb). Sci. Hortic. 125, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.02.015

Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2019. Impact of the degree of maturity of walnuts (Juglans regia L.) and their variety on the antioxidant potential and the content of tocopherols and polyphenols. Molecules. 24, 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162936

Pycia K, Kapusta I, Jaworska G. 2020. Changes in antioxidant activity, profile, and content of polyphenols and tocopherols in common hazel seed (Corylus avellana L.) depending on variety and harvest date. Molecules. 25, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010043

Salas JJ, Sánchez J, Ramli US, Manaf AM, Williams M, Harwood JL. 2000. Biochemistry of lipid metabolism in olive and other oil fruits. Prog. Lipid Res. 39, 151-180.

Seyhan F, Ozay G, Saklar S, Ertaş E, Satır G, Alasalvar C. 2007. Chemical changes of three native Turkish hazelnut varieties (Corylus avellana L.) during fruit development. Food Chem. 105, 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.016

Silvestri C, Bacchetta L, Bellincontro A, Cristofori V. 2021. Advances in cultivar choice, hazelnut orchard management, and nut storage to enhance product quality and safety: an overview. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10557

Venkatachalam M, Sathe SK. 2006. Chemical composition of selected edible nut seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 4705-4714. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0606959

Wani IA, Ayoub A, Bhat NA, Dar AH, Gull A. 2020. Hazelnut. In Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts-Properties and Health Benefits. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2

Wei F, Li Y, Sun D, Chen Q, Fu M, Zhao H, Chen X, Huang Y, Xu H. 2022. Odor, tastes, nutritional compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh-eating walnut during ripening. Sci. Hortic. 293, 110744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110744

Wei L, Zhai Q. 2010. The dynamics and correlation between nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium in a hazelnut fruit during its development. Front. Agric. China. 4 (3), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1010-1

Yang J, Gadi R, Thomson T. 2011. Antioxidant capacity, total phenols, and ascorbic acid content of noni (Morinda citrifolia) fruits and leaves at various stages of maturity. Micronesica, 41, 167-176.