<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing-oasis-article1-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GYA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Grasas y Aceites</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Grasas y Aceites</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn publication-format="electronic">1988-4214</issn>
			<issn-l>0017-3495</issn-l>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#xed;ficas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">gya.0329201</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/gya.0329201</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Research</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil: Quality and stability</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>Aceite de semilla de nopal prensado en fr&#xed;o: calidad y estabilidad</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-5099</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>de Wit</surname>
						<given-names>M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<email xlink:href="dewitm@ufs.ac.za">dewitm@ufs.ac.za</email>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution content-type="department">Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology</institution>, <institution>University of the Free State</institution>, <addr-line>P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9301</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8481-7768</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Motsamai</surname>
						<given-names>V.K.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution content-type="department">Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology</institution>, <institution>University of the Free State</institution>, <addr-line>P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9301</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-6605</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Hugo</surname>
						<given-names>A.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff3"><institution content-type="department">Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology</institution>, <institution>University of the Free State</institution>, <addr-line>P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9301</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>27</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<month>09</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>72</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<elocation-id>e415</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>11</day>
					<month>03</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>04</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="pub">
					<day>14</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>&#xa9;2021 CSIC</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="http://grasasyaceites.revistas.csic.es/index.php/grasasyaceites/article/view/XXXX/XXXX"/>
			<abstract>
				<title>Summary</title>
				<p>Cold-pressed seed oil from twelve commercially produced cactus pear cultivars was assessed for oil yield, fatty acid composition, physicochemical properties, quality and stability. Large differences in oil content, fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties (IV, PV, RI, tocopherols, ORAC, % FFA, OSI and induction time) were observed. Oil content ranged between 2.51% and 5.96% (Meyers and American Giant). The important fatty acids detected were C16:0, C18:0, C18:1c9 and C18:2c9,12, with C18:2c9,12, the dominating fatty acid, ranging from 58.56-65.73%, followed by C18:1c9, ranging between 13.18-16.07%, C16:0, which ranged between 10.97 - 15.07% and C18:0, which ranged between 2.62-3.18%. Other fatty acids such as C14:0, C16:1c9, C17:0, C17:1c10, C20:0, C18:3c9,12,15 and C20:3c8,11,14 were detected in small amounts. The quality parameters of the oils were strongly influenced by oil content, fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties. Oil content, PV, % FFA, RI, IV, tocopherols, ORAC and <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-anisidine value were negatively correlated with OSI. C18:0; C18:1c9; C18:2c9,12; MUFA; PUFA; <italic>n</italic>-6 and PUFA/SFA were also negatively correlated with OSI. Among all the cultivars, American Giant was identified as the paramount cultivar with good quality traits (oil content and oxidative stability).</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>Resumen</title>
				<p>Se evalu&#xf3; el rendimiento de aceite, la composici&#xf3;n en &#xe1;cidos grasos, las propiedades fisicoqu&#xed;micas, la calidad y la estabilidad del aceite de semilla prensadas en fr&#xed;o de doce cultivares de nopal producidos comercialmente. Se observaron grandes diferencias en el contenido de aceite, la composici&#xf3;n en &#xe1;cidos grasos y las propiedades fisicoqu&#xed;micas (IV, PV, RI, tocoferoles, ORAC, % FFA, OSI y tiempo de inducci&#xf3;n). El contenido de aceite vari&#xf3; entre 2,51-5,96% (Meyers y American Giant). Los &#xe1;cidos grasos mayoritarios fueron C16:0, C18:0, C18:1c9 y C18:2c9,12, siendo el C18:2c9,12 el mayoritario con porcentajes entre 58,56-65,73, seguido de C18:c9 que var&#xed;a entre 13,18-16,07%, C16:0, 10,97-15.07% y C18:0 entre 2,62-3,18%. Otros &#xe1;cidos grasos, tales como C14:0, C16:1c9, C17:1c10, C20:0, C18:3c9,12,15 y C20:3c8,11,14 se detectaron en peque&#xf1;as cantidades. Los par&#xe1;metros de calidad de los aceites estuvieron estrechamente influenciados por el contenido total de aceite, la composici&#xf3;n de &#xe1;cidos grasos y las propiedades fisicoqu&#xed;micas. El contenido de aceite, PV, % FFA, RI, IV, tocoferoles, ORAC y el valor de <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-anisidina se correlacionaron negativamente con OSI. C18:0; C18:1c9; C18: 2c9,12; MUFA; PUFA; n-6 y PUFA / SFA tambi&#xe9;n se correlacionaron negativamente con OSI. Entre todos los cultivares, American Giant fue identificado como el cultivar primordial con rasgos de buena calidad (contenido de aceite y estabilidad oxidativa).</p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>Antioxidants</kwd>
				<kwd>Induction time</kwd>
				<kwd>Oxidation</kwd>
				<kwd>Prickly pear</kwd>
				<kwd>Yield</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<kwd>Antioxidantes</kwd>
				<kwd>Higo chumbo</kwd>
				<kwd>Oxidaci&#xf3;n</kwd>
				<kwd>Rendimiento</kwd>
				<kwd>Tiempo de inducci&#xf3;n</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<funding-group id="fw-01">
				<award-group id="aw1">
					<funding-source>ARC-UFS-DUT</funding-source>
				</award-group>
				<funding-statement>The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the following people and institutions: Dr. H.J. Fouch&#xe9; from the ARC for providing the fruit; Mr. Fanie Rautenbach from CPUT for his assistance with the tocopherol and ORAC tests; the ARC-UFS-DUT collaborative consortium for funding of the project.</funding-statement>
			</funding-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="2"/>
				<table-count count="4"/>
				<equation-count count="2"/>
				<ref-count count="50"/>
				<page-count count="19"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
			<label>1.</label>
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Edible cold-pressed oils are functional products because of their bioactive substances such as polyunsaturated fatty acids, tocopherols, sterols, phenols, carotenoids and chlorophyll. These oils have specific characteristics which provide additional health benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Boskou, 2017</xref>). The use of non-traditional cold-pressed oils to be introduced into the cosmetic and nutraceutical markets is expected to increase. Recently, research on oils from fig seeds from Morocco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hssaini <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>), lentisk and skeels from Algeria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brahmi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) as well as milk thistle oil and their functional properties were reported. Cactus pear seed oil has been viewed as an important vegetable oil because of its related quality composition factors, namely high concentrations of important fatty acids, for example, linoleic acid (C18:2c9,12) (C18:2 n-6); vitamin E (100 mg/100g) and sterols (1 g/100g) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ennouri <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>). In the past, oil quality was estimated based on oil yield and fatty acid composition alone. Lately, in addition to fatty acid composition, the natural antioxidants, tocopherols and sterols are additional important components which define oil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mart&#xed;nez <italic>et al</italic>., 2004</xref>). Oil quality has been transformed by the development of oil with enhanced nutritional and functional properties, and these modifications are incorporated when breeding for increased quantities of C18:2c9,12.</p>
			<p>Cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil is characterized by a high content of unsaturated fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sawaya and Khan, 1982</xref>). Past research has demonstrated that vegetable oil with the highest unsaturation level is most likely to undergo autoxidation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mart&#xed;nez <italic>et al</italic>. (2011)</xref> reported that there are elements that can potentially affect the stability and quality of oil in a negative way, for example light, heat, metals, free fatty acids, tocopherols, phospholipids and waxes which contain pro or antioxidant properties. Hydrolytic reactions which are catalyzed by lipases and react with atmospheric oxygen (autoxidation) are a major cause of nutritional and oil quality losses. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Naz <italic>et al</italic>. (2004)</xref> explained oxidation as an autocatalytic series of reactions that requires low activation energy. These authors also reported that fatty acid composition and the presence of antioxidants in vegetable oil influences oxidation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lajara <italic>et al.</italic> (1990)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Izquierdo <italic>et al</italic>. (2009)</xref> reported that oils containing high contents of oleic acid (C18:1c9) will possibly have greater stability against oxidation and are favored for improved shelf-life. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Naz <italic>et al</italic>. (2004)</xref> further reported that to minimize the effect of hydrolytic reactions, cold storage and proper packaging must be applied. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mart&#xed;nez <italic>et al</italic>. (2011)</xref> stated that the oxidative stability of cold-pressed oils is usually measured by the level of peroxide and <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-anisidine values. The level of unsaturation (polyunsaturated fatty acids) (PUFA), especially the level of &#x3b1;-linoleic acid (C18:2c9,12) and the amounts of antioxidants may perhaps limit the stability of these oils. Tocopherols are reported to be strong antioxidants which can scavenge peroxyl radicals. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Choe and Min (2006)</xref> indicated that the stability of these oils is commonly set for 6 months or a year. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Normand <italic>et al.</italic> (2006)</xref> stated that oils with high tocopherol contents have greater stability. Cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil was reported to have higher contents (94.6 mg/100g) of tocopherols than olive oil (22 mg/100g), soybean oil (49 mg/100g) and sunflower oil (49 mg/100g), and close to those of argan oil (85 mg/100g) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zine <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). </p>
			<p>Cactus pear seed oil is a promising source of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), with significant levels of carotenoids and &#x3b3;-tocopherols which can be used as antioxidants to preserve lipid components and serve as functional ingredients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Proper utilization of this seed by-product can generate up to 1220&#x20ac; income per ton and is therefore a potentially new economic source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al. (</italic>2018)</xref> prickly pear seed oils are rich in functional metabolites and linoleic fatty acids. Furthermore, this oil could be used in foods as a nutritional supplement, as well as an ingredient in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. A major advantage is that the residual oilcake can be directly used in animal feed or other secondary products.</p>
			<p>Recent research on the oil quality of seed oil from different colored cactus pear fruit seed oil found that cultivar played a major role in the composition of the oils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>). Furthermore, oil content and the composition of oils from different origins were reported to indicate differences between cultivars from Sicily and those from Algeria and Morocco; while similarities occurred between cultivars from Sicily and Tunisia, indicating an origin/environment effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). In addition, the effect of different species, e.g. <italic>Opuntia dillenii,</italic> on oil quality was reported. New studies on <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> seed oils from countries such as Greece (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) and Saudi Arabia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Koshak <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) have been undertaken very recently.</p>
			<p>In a previous study done by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, the quality aspects of chemically extracted (Soxhlet extraction) seed oils from a few selected cultivars were quantitatively analyzed. The current study focused on the oil yield, composition, quality and stability of cold-pressed seed oil of commercially produced <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> cultivars. <italic>O. robusta</italic> seed was included as a reference and for comparison purposes. The aim of this study was to determine the quality and oxidative stability of cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil from 12 chosen cultivars. The quality attributes assessed included oil content, fatty acid composition, refractive index, tocopherols, oxygen radical antioxidant capacity, peroxide value and &#x3c1;-anisidine value; while stability tests included the oxidative stability index (OSI), as well as induction time extrapolated at 25 and 30 &#xb0;C. </p>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
			<label>2.</label>
			<title>Materials and methods</title>
			<sec id="sec2.1">
				<label>2.1.</label>
				<title>Seed material used</title>
				<p>Fruit from selected cultivars growing at an experimental orchard outside Bloemfontein (29.0852 &#xb0;S, 26.1596 &#xb0;E) was collected during the 2014, 2015 and 2016 seasons. Twelve cultivars, namely Algerian, American Giant, Ficus-Indice, Gymno Carpo, Meyers, Morado, Nudosa, Ofer, Tormentosa, Van As and Zastron were chosen. These <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> cultivars are commercially produced for fresh fruit consumption. The <italic>O. robusta</italic> cultivar, Robusta, represents a different species and was included because it is commonly found and cultivated as animal fodder in South Africa. The fruit collection was done when the fruit reached 50% color break stage and &#xb1;75 kg of fruit per cultivar were collected to produce 2-3 kg of seeds. The seeds were extracted with an industrial liquidizer (Ingram Engineering, Zastron, South Africa) which separates the seeds from the pulp and peels. The seeds were washed with water and collected in a rotating sieved drum. The seeds were then dried under direct sunlight for 2-3 days on shade-netting, placed &#xb1; 1 m from the ground to allow for sufficient ventilation. The seeds were manually turned regularly. The drying process aimed to dry out any pulp tissue left on the seed surfaces for easy removal and cleaning before pressing. In a previous study done by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref>, the moisture content in seeds varied from ~3% to ~7.2% due to variations in location, season and especially rainfall. The dried seeds were then vacuum-packed and stored in a freezer at -18 &#xba;C until further analysis. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.2">
				<label>2.2.</label>
				<title>Seed oil extraction (cold-pressing)</title>
				<p>The dried seeds from all cultivars for each season were cold-pressed in a Komet DD85G twin screw plant oil press (Oekotek, IBG Monforts, Germany) at Nattrend/Bauma Investments CC commercial oil pressing laboratory in Montana Park, Pretoria. The oil extracted using the Komet cold-pressing system is subjected to low temperatures and therefore top-quality vegetable oil which can be utilized for human consumption without any further treatment depending on the raw material used (Schramm, 2016; pers. comm.). The oilcake extrudes out of the oil press in the shape of pellets. The oil was then stored in amber screw-cap 50 ml plastic bottles for one week at room temperature before analysis. The oil analysis for each cultivar for each of the three seasons was done in triplicate.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.3">
				<label>2.3.</label>
				<title>Oil yield</title>
				<p>The oil yield from the seeds of each cultivar from each season was determined according to the formula: </p>
				<disp-formula>
					<mml:math id="mml-1">
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.4">
				<label>2.4.</label>
				<title>Physico-chemical properties</title>
				<sec id="sec2.4.1">
					<label>2.4.1.</label>
					<title>Fatty acid composition (fatty acid methyl esters) (FAME)</title>
					<p>Approximately 20 mg of total lipid (from cold-pressed oil) were transferred to a Teflon-lined screw-top test tube with a glass pasteur pipette. Fatty acids were methylated to methyl esters by using 0.5 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in methanol and 14% boron trifluoride in methanol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Park and Goins, 1994</xref>). The fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were quantified using a Varian 430 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector with a fused silica capillary column (Chrompack CPSIL 88, 100 m length, 0.25 mm ID, 0.2 mm film thickness). Column temperature was 40-230 &#xb0;C (held 2 minutes; 4 &#xb0;C/minute; held 10 minutes). Fatty acid methyl esters in hexane (1ml) were injected into the column using a Varian CP8400 Auto-sampler with a split ratio of 100:1. The injection port as well as the detector were maintained at 250 &#xb0;C. The carrier gas was hydrogen, at 45 psi. The makeup gas was nitrogen. Galaxy Star Chromatography Software was used to record the chromatograms. The peaks were identified by comparing the relative retention times of FAME peaks from samples with that of standards from Supelco (Supelco 37 Component Fame Mix 47885-U, Sigma-Aldrich Aston Manor, Pretoria, South Africa). Fatty acids were expressed as the relative percentage of each individual fatty acid as a percentage of the total of all fatty acids in the sample. The following fatty acid ratios and combinations were calculated from the fatty acid data: total saturated fatty acids (SFA), total mono-unsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), total omega-6, total omega-3 fatty acid content and the PUFA/SFA (P/S) ratio.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.4.2">
					<label>2.4.2.</label>
					<title>Refraction index (RI)</title>
					<p>Refractive Index (RI) was determined according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists&#x2019; (AOAC), official method 921.08 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>) with an Abb&#xe8; programmed advanced refractometer from ATAGO&#xae; (Model RX 5000&#x3b1;) at 40 &#xb0;C. </p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.4.3">
					<label>2.4.3.</label>
					<title>Iodine value (IV)</title>
					<p>Hanus iodine Value (IV) was determined by the AOAC official method 920.158 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>), which consists of adding a mixture of iodine and bromine in glacial acetic acid and measuring the excess of unused halogen by titration with sodium thiosulfate. </p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.4.4">
					<label>2.4.4.</label>
					<title>Tocopherols</title>
					<p>High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the tocopherol amount in each sample using Shimadzu CR8A instruments (Champ sur Marne, France) equipped with a C18-Varian column (25 cm x 4 mm; Varian Incorporated, Middleburg, Netherlands). One gram of each oil sample was added to 5 mL of ethanol (EtOH), filtered (45&#x3bc;m) into a HPLC vial at 25 &#xba;C. HPLC was carried out with an injection volume of 20 &#x3bc;L, a flow rate of 1 ml/min and estimated at UV of 296 nm. The mobile stages were: mobile stage A (Acetonitrile: Methanol: Isopropanol: Water (45:45:5:5, v/v/v/v)) and mobile stage B (Acetonitrile: Methanol: Isopropanol (50:45:5, v/v/v)). </p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.4.5">
					<label>2.4.5.</label>
					<title>Oxygen Radical Antioxidant Capacity (ORAC)</title>
					<p>For the Oxygen Radical Antioxidant Capacity (ORAC) analysis, the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Prior <italic>et al</italic>. (2003)</xref> was used, where samples (10 g each) were diluted with 80% methanol in H<sub>2</sub>O (1:1 w/v), and then vortexed for 2 minutes at room temperature and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 500 X g. The peroxyl radicals were generated with 2, 2&#x2019;-Azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochlorine (AAPH) and B-phycoerythrin (B-PE) was used as the detector of radical activity. The final reaction mixture was prepared in 10-mm-wide quartz cuvettes as follows: 1600 &#x3bc;L of 0.04 &#x3bc;M B-PE in 0.0075 M sodium (Na) - potassium (K) phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 and 200 &#x3bc;L of 50 &#x3bc;M Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman -2-carboxylic acid). Phosphate buffer was used as a blank (200 &#x3bc;L of methanol, diluted 1:20 (v/v) with 0.075 M Na-K, at pH 7.0 and Trolox (&#x3b2; and &#x3b3; tocopherol analogue) as the standards during each run. Samples were pre-incubated at 37 &#xba;C for 15 min. AAPH was added. Flourescence was measured and measurements were recorded every 5 minutes for 35 minutes at 570 nm until a steady state (plateau) of fluorescence decay was reached. The results were then calculated and expressed as &#x3bc;mol of Trolox equivalent (TE). The analyses were done in triplicate. </p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.5">
				<label>2.5.</label>
				<title>Determination of oxidative stability</title>
				<sec id="sec2.5.1">
					<label>2.5.1.</label>
					<title>Free Fatty Acids (FFA)</title>
					<p>Free fatty acids were determined according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pearson (1973)</xref>, which involves the titration of the oil in an alcoholic medium against potassium hydroxide using phenolphthalein as indicator. </p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.5.2">
					<label>2.5.2.</label>
					<title>Peroxide value (PV)</title>
					<p>Peroxide value was determined by the official method of the AOAC 965.33 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>). Peroxide value determines hydrogen peroxide, a primary oxidation product, and involves peroxides liberating iodine from potassium iodide by calculating the amount of sodium thiosulfate consumed.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.5.3">
					<label>2.5.3.</label>
					<title>&#x3c1;-Anisidine value (&#x3c1;-AV)</title>
					<p>The <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV was determined using the technique of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hamilton and Hamilton (1992)</xref>. It determines the amounts of aldehydes and ketones during secondary oxidation by reaction with <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine (4-methoxyaniline) using a spectrophotometer at 350 nm.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.5.4">
					<label>2.5.4.</label>
					<title>Oxidative Stability index (OSI)</title>
					<p>The oxidative stability index (OSI) was determined using the AOAC OSI official method Cd 12b-92 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>) with a Rancimat 743 apparatus from Metrohm. Three samples were tested per cultivar.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec2.5.5">
					<label>2.5.5.</label>
					<title>Extrapolated induction time (Shelf-life prediction at 25 and 30 &#xb0;C)</title>
					<p>The oxidative stability index (OSI) was determined using the AOAC OSI official method Cd 12b-92 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>) with a Rancimat 743 apparatus from Metrohm. Three samples were tested per cultivar. Oxidative stability index (OSI) values were determined at 100, 110, 120 and 130 &#xb0;C for each sample in duplicate. The extrapolation function of the Rancimat 743 apparatus was used to predict induction times at 25 and 30 <sup>o</sup>C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rancimat Manual, 2009</xref>) according to the formula: </p>
					<disp-formula>
						<mml:math id="mml-2">
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
									<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
									<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi>
									<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi>
									<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">  </mml:mi>
						</mml:math>
					</disp-formula>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.6">
				<label>2.6.</label>
				<title>Statistical analysis</title>
				<p>Seed were selected from each of the 2014, 2015 and 2016 harvest. Oil yield was determined for each cultivar for each season. Each measurement was made in triplicate on oil from each cultivar per year. Data were captured for the three years and were reported as average &#xb1; standard deviation using NCSS Statistical Software package, version 11.0.20). The Pearson correlation analysis was done to determine the link between the physico-chemical properties of the oil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">NCSS Statistical Software package, version 11.0.20</xref>).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec3" sec-type="results|discussion">
			<label>3.</label>
			<title>Results and discussion</title>
			<sec id="sec3.1">
				<label>3.1.</label>
				<title>Oil yield</title>
				<p>Seed oil content ranged from 2.51 to 5.96% (Meyers and American Giant), respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>). Gymno Carpo and Morado were amongst those which attained the lowest oil contents (2.72 and 2.78%). In a previous limited study, the chemical extraction of seed oils from only seven selected cultivars by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, the oil content ranged from 5.65-8.09%. A subsequent elaborated study on seed oil from 42 cultivars by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> reported oil contents ranging from 4.09-8.76%. The lower yield values reported in the current study were expected since the oil was recovered by pressing and not by chemical extraction as in the above-mentioned studies. American Giant also obtained the highest oil content in the study of 42 cultivars by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref>. The values obtained in the current study agree with those reported for the same commercial South African cactus pear cultivars from the Limpopo Province by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Labuschagn&#xe9; and Hugo (2010)</xref> (2.24 to 5.69%). That study did not include American Giant.</p>
				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Oil yield (%) of cold-pressed oil for all 12 cultivars.</title>
						<p> Oil yield was expressed as % Oil yield = Mass of oil (g) / Mass of cactus pear seed (g) x 100. Values in the Figure are mean &#xb1;SD of triplicate analyses.</p>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-1" xlink:href="GYA-72-03-e415-gf1.png"/>
				</fig>
				<p>It was also found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ortega-Ortega <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al.</italic> (2018)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al</italic>. (2019)</xref> that extraction method had an effect on the oil yield of cactus pear seeds. These authors and others, e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> also reported the effect of variety and species on the oil yield of cactus pear seeds. High yields of 9.3- 9.5 g oil per 100 g seed were reported for Sicilian cactus pears (<italic>O. ficus-indica</italic>) extracted with hexane by the Soxhlet method, while Ultra-Sound Assisted extraction yielded 5.4-5.6 g/100 g. The highest yields were found in the Turkish and Moroccan varieties (&#x2248; 14 g/100 g seed) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chougui <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). Lower values than those were reported for Algerian (7.3-9.3 g/100 g seed) and Tunisian fruit seed oils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chougui <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). The lowest values were found for the Greek wild <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> variety (yellow to green fruit) of 5.4%, which was also obtained by cold-pressing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). Slightly higher yields were reported for <italic>O. microdasys</italic> (Engelm) (9.2%) and <italic>O. macrorhiza</italic> (11.3%) from Tunisia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chahdoura <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>). Maceration-Percolation (MP) extraction was used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> to yield oil contents of up to 15.5% from <italic>O. robusta</italic> species (14.54 - 15.54%). Oil yields for other prickly pear varieties included <italic>O. albicarpa</italic> (8.72%), <italic>O. magacantha</italic> (6.16 - 7.63%), <italic>O. matudae</italic> (9.68%), <italic>O. streptacantha</italic> (10.55 - 11.64%) and <italic>O. dillenii</italic> (6.5%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali Asaad <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>).</p>
				<p>Fruit color was also indicated as a factor influencing oil yield, e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> reported higher yields from a green cultivar compared to a red cultivar. American Giant from the current study is also a green cultivar. These results support research that pointed out that cultivar, crop, environment and origin (rainfall, soil type and soil nutrients, light, temperature) and extraction method, including extraction solvents (hexane &gt; ethanol &gt; ethyl acetate) influence oil yields. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al</italic>. (2020)</xref>, the most important factors are variety and extraction process.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.2">
				<label>3.2.</label>
				<title>Physico-chemical properties</title>
				<sec id="sec3.2.1">
					<label>3.2.1.</label>
					<title>Fatty acid composition</title>
					<p>The fatty acid compositions of cold-pressed oil from a selection of cactus pear cultivars are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>. According to the results presented, there are considerable variations in the fatty acid percentage of the selected cultivars. The dominating fatty acids identified (in decreasing order) were linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6) (C18:2c9,12); oleic acid (C18:1 n-9) (C18:1c9); palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0); while palmitoleic acid (C16:1 n-9) (C16:1c9), &#x3b1;-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) (C18:3c9,12,15), arachidic acid (C20:0) and lignoceric acid (C24:0) were notable in small amounts in all cultivars. C16:0, C18:0, C18:1c9 and C18:2c9, 12 were the only fatty acids detected at levels of more than 1%. This is in accordance with the results of various authors who reported that cactus pear seed oil contained primarily unsaturated fatty acids namely linoleic and oleic acid, and with a lower but significant content of palmitic and stearic fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chougui <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ortega-Ortega <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al.,</italic> 2019</xref>). A completely different profile was found for the Greek <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> which included butyric acid (C4:0), palmitic acid, stearic acid and oleic acid as the main fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>).</p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Fatty acid composition of oil from 12 selected cold-pressed cactus pear cultivars (fatty acids were expressed as the proportion of each individual fatty acid to the total of all fatty acids present in the sample).</title>
							<p>Values in the Table are mean &#xb1;SD of triplicate analyses.</p>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2">Cultivar</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="15">Fatty acids</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Myristic</th>
									<th align="left">Palmitic</th>
									<th align="left">Palmiteloleic</th>
									<th align="left">Margaric</th>
									<th align="left">Heptadecenoic</th>
									<th align="left">Stearic</th>
									<th align="left">Oleic</th>
									<th align="left">Vaccenic</th>
									<th align="left">Linoleic</th>
									<th align="left">Arachidic</th>
									<th align="left">Eicosenoic</th>
									<th align="left">&#x3b1;-Linolenic</th>
									<th align="left">Eicosatrienoic (8,11,14)</th>
									<th align="left">Eicosatrienoic (11, 14, 17)</th>
									<th align="left">Lignoceric</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Algerian</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.54 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.55 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.01 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.04 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">13.86 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">5.87 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">63.29 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">0.23&#xb1; 0.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">American Giant</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">10.97 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.38 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.01 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.74 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">16.37 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">5.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">62.49 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.28&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.10 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.21 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">0.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.02 </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ficus-Indice</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.05 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
									<td align="center">0.56 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.01 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.86 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">15.74 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">6.21 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">61.66 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">0.35&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Gymno Carpo</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">13.24 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.62 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.62 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.22 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">6.16 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">64.10 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">0.21 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.32 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Meyers</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.31 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.81 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.18 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">15.61 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">6.53 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">60.68 &#xb1; 0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.26 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
									<td align="center">0.18 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.15 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.10 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Morado</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.77 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">0.59 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.01 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.81 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">13.51 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">6.05 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">63.28 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.21 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.36&#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.09 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Nudosa</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">15.07 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.75 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.01 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">15.78 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
									<td align="center">5.69 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">58.56 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.26 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">0.35&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ofer</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.65 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
									<td align="center">0.61 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.81 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">14.98 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">6.17 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">61.83 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
									<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Robusta</td>
									<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">11.93 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.41 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.68 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">13.46 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">5.48 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">65.18 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.21 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
									<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
									<td align="center">0.13 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Tormentosa</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">12.19 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">0.59 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">14.99 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">6.04 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">62.14 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.24 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.13 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Van As</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">11.80 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.58 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.01 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.98 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">16.07 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">6.30 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">61.29 &#xb1; 0.10</td>
									<td align="center">0.24 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.17 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
									<td align="center">0.24 &#xb1; 0.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.09 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Zastron</td>
									<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">11.71 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.38 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.70 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">13.18 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">5.36 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">65.73 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.20 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.19 &#xb1; 0.15</td>
									<td align="center">0.24 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
									<td align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
					<p>The C18:2c9,12 content varied from 58.56% (Nudosa) to 65.18% (Robusta) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). A slightly larger range for C18:2c9,12 between 57.75-67.32% was reported by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> and de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> (56.86-65.21%). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Labuschagn&#xe9; and Hugo (2010)</xref> also reported comparable results for fatty acid profiles with unsaturated fatty acids (C18:2c9,12) ranging between 57.75-67.32%. Linoleic acid (omega-6) is an essential fatty acid and a precursor of arachidonic acid (AA) biosynthesis which is the substrate for eicosanoid synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). Both present a hypocholesterolemic effect and inhibit colon cancer. Omega-6 PUFA is the source of inflammatory mediators&#x2019; prostaglandins (PGE) and leukotrienes. Consumption of oleic acid (n-9) and &#x3b1;-linolenic acid (n-3) act as AA antagonists and reduces the production of inflammatory mediators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Koshak <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Higher levels were found in <italic>O. microdasys</italic> (Engelm) and <italic>O. macrorhiza</italic> as well as <italic>O. dillenii</italic> (&gt; 70%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chahdoura <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali Alsaad <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>); while the current results are in agreement with the levels reported for <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> varieties from Sicily, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Tunisia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al.,</italic> 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Astiasar&#xe1;n and Candela (2000)</xref> reported a comparable study on PUFAs (C18:2c9,12) content of various vegetable oils, i.e. soy oil which obtained 48.7%, corn oils (47.7%), sesame oils (44.5%), sunflower oil (49.7%), olive oil ranging from 3.5-21% and cotton oils with 50%. These values are all significantly lower than the values obtained in this current study, implying that cactus pear is the best in terms of oil PUFA yield. PUFAs are able to alleviate symptoms of diseases such as coronary heart disease, stroke and rheumatoid arthritis. </p>
					<p>The highest amount of C18:1c9 was detected for American Giant with 16.37% compared with Gymno Carpo, which demonstrated the lowest amount with 12.22%. Robusta contained 13.46% C18:1c9. The highest value for vaccenic acid (C18:1 n-7) (C18:1c7) was observed for Meyers (6.53%) and the lowest for American Giant (5.14%). Robusta (<italic>O. robusta</italic>) obtained 5.48%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al.</italic> (2019)</xref> reported values ranging from 15.8 - 18.1% for C18:1c9 from two <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> cultivars (red and yellow) extracted by two different methods (Soxhlet and Ultrasound-Assisted). These authors reported values ranging between 4.3% and 5.1% for C18:1c7. The values for C18:1c9 reported by these authors were higher than in the current study, while the C18:1c7 values were somewhat lower than the current study&#x2019;s values. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciriminna <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref> obtained a higher content of vaccenic acid (6.29%) for yellow Sicilian <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seed oil, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chougui <italic>et al.</italic> (2013)</xref> reported no vaccenic acid in yellow Algerian fruit. A vaccenic acid content of 4.83% was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tlili <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref> for Tunisian cactus pears. Interestingly, seed oil from <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> from Marocco had no oleic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). </p>
					<p>The saturated fatty acid (SFA) palmitic acid (C16:0) ranged between 10.97 and 15.07% and stearic acid (C18:0) ranged between 2.62 and 3.74%. American Giant obtained the lowest content of C16:0 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) and the highest oil percentage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>). These C16:0 values are slightly lower than those reported by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> which ranged between 12.90 and 17.83% (Monterey and Nudosa, respectively) and the range reported by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> namely 12.72-16.05%. The C18:0 content varied between 2.62% (Gymno Carpo) and 3.74% (American Giant) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), indicating only slight variation in C18:0 levels. Similar values were reported for chemically extracted oil as reported by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> (2.21-3.39%) and de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> (2.4-4.01%). These results are in agreement to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizza <italic>et al</italic>. (2019)</xref> who found that fatty acid content is not affected by extraction method but by variety. Interestingly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> found that oil extracted by cold-pressing was richer in UFA and poorer in SFA than oils extracted with solvents. Regarding SFA, the palmitic acid (5.12%) and stearic acid (7.51%) found in <italic>O. dillenii</italic> presented the main saturated fatty acid (&gt; 22%). These are even higher than the SFA found in soy (~3%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali Alsaad <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Stearic acid has a neutral effect on LDL.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.2.2">
					<label>3.2.2.</label>
					<title>Fatty acid ratios</title>
					<p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref> SFA ranged from 14.76 (Zastron) to 18.50% (Nudosa). The results for the fatty acid composition presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> show that C16:0 and C18:0 were observed to be marginally lower than those reported in the publication of de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al. (</italic>2017)</xref> (16.59-20.65%) and de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> (16.19-19.12%) yet higher than those obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ennouri <italic>et al</italic>. (2005)</xref>. These fatty acids will influence SFA ratios, since they are the main contributors to SFA. The stage of development of the fruit may be the cause of variation in fatty acid composition, but in this study the fruits were all picked at the same maturity stage (50% color break), although genotype, climate and weather, as well as environmental effects may be the reason behind this variation. According to de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref>, weather conditions, particularly were the main factors contributing to variations in fatty acid composition and oil percentage. </p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Fatty acid ratios of oil from 12 selected cold-pressed cactus pear cultivars (fatty acids were expressed as the proportion of each individual fatty acid to the total of all fatty acids present in the sample). Values in the Table are mean &#xb1;SD of triplicate analyses.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Cultivar</th>
									<th align="center">Saturated fatty acids (SFA)</th>
									<th align="center">Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA)</th>
									<th align="center">Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)</th>
									<th align="center">Omega-6 fatty acids</th>
									<th align="center">Omega-3 Fatty acids</th>
									<th align="center">PUFA/SFA</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Algerian</td>
									<td align="center">15.96 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">20.34&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">63.70&#xb1; 0.10</td>
									<td align="center">63.42&#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.28&#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">3.99&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">American Giant</td>
									<td align="center">15.13 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">22.00&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">62.87&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">62.64&#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.23&#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">4.16&#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ficus-Indice</td>
									<td align="center">15.27&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">22.58&#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">62.15&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">61.78&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.37&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">4.07&#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Gymno Carpo</td>
									<td align="center">16.21&#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">19.13&#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">64.67&#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">64.21&#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">0.46&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.99&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Meyers</td>
									<td align="center">15.94&#xb1; 0.16</td>
									<td align="center">23.10&#xb1; 0.25</td>
									<td align="center">60.87&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">60.83&#xb1; 0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.20&#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">3.81&#xb1; 0.03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Morado</td>
									<td align="center">15.91&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">20.24&#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">63.85&#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">63.40&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.46&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">4.01&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Nudosa</td>
									<td align="center">18.50&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">22.28&#xb1; 0.24</td>
									<td align="center">59.23&#xb1; 0.24</td>
									<td align="center">58.78&#xb1; 0.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.45&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">3.20&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ofer</td>
									<td align="center">15.83&#xb1; 0.19</td>
									<td align="center">21.84&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">62.32&#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">61.96&#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.37&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.94&#xb1; 0.05</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Robusta</td>
									<td align="center">14.96&#xb1; 0.17</td>
									<td align="center">19.48&#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">65.55&#xb1; 0.31</td>
									<td align="center">65.32&#xb1; 0.12</td>
									<td align="center">0.24&#xb1; 0.19</td>
									<td align="center">4.38&#xb1; 0.07</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Tormentosa</td>
									<td align="center">15.66&#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">21.69&#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">62.65&#xb1; 0.08</td>
									<td align="center">62.27&#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.37&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">4.00&#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Van As</td>
									<td align="center">15.18&#xb1; 0.10</td>
									<td align="center">23.14&#xb1; 0.1</td>
									<td align="center">61.68&#xb1; 0.10</td>
									<td align="center">61.43&#xb1; 0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.25&#xb1; 0.20</td>
									<td align="center">4.06&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Zastron</td>
									<td align="center">14.76&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">19.12&#xb1; 0.15</td>
									<td align="center">66.13&#xb1; 0.11</td>
									<td align="center">65.84&#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">0.28&#xb1; 0.24</td>
									<td align="center">4.48&#xb1; 0.02</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>Values in the Table are mean &#xb1;SD of triplicate analyses.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
					<p>Total MUFA ranged between 19.12 and 23.10%, which corresponds to that reported by de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> (15.78-23.30%) and de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> (17.4-23.61%). Gymno Carpo and Zastron obtained the lowest MUFA contents (19.13% and 19,12%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), while Meyers and Van As showed the highest contents of MUFA (23.14% and 23.10%), respectively. MUFA, such as C18:1c9, ranged between 12.22% (Gymno Carpo) and 16.07% (Van As) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Oil containing high concentration of C18:1c9 has been reported to be more stable to oxidation, which is desired for improved shelf-life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lajara <italic>et al</italic>., 1990</xref>). </p>
					<p>PUFA was established as the most prominent fatty acid ratio ranging between 59.23 (Nudosa) and 66.13% (Zastron). PUFA from de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref> was at the lower range and ranged from 55.98 - 67.62%. C18:2c9,12 was established as the dominating PUFA with the lowest level of 58.56% for Nudosa and the highest level of 65.18% for Robusta (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), with C20:3c9,12,15 (0.22 to 0.35%) and C20:3c8,11,14 (0.13 to 0.22%) occurring at very low levels. </p>
					<p>Omega-6 (n-6) fatty acids ranged from 58.78-65.84% (Nudosa and Zastron, respectively). All the cultivars, with the exception of Nudosa, contained n-6 contents at above 60%. Nudosa attained the lowest concentration of n-6 fatty acid ratio with 58.78% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Zastron had the highest contents of PUFA and n-6 but obtained the lowest content of MUFA. These contents were found to be slightly higher compared to results from de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> (55.98 - 67.45%). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pardo <italic>et al</italic>. (2009)</xref> concluded that cactus pear seed oils are good sources of omega-6 fatty acids.</p>
					<p>The omega-3 (n-3) fatty acid ratio occurred at very low levels (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The contents ranged from 0.20 (Meyers) - 0.46% (Gymno Carpo), respectively. Omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids, such as C18:3c9,12,15 (C18:3 n-3) occurred at a very low level and ranged from 0.18 - 0.36% (Meyers and Morado in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). </p>
					<p>The PUFA/SFA ratio is used to measure the level of unsaturation and is taken as an instrument to measure the oil&#x2019;s tendency to undergo autoxidation. The PUFA/SFA ratio ranged from 3.20 - 4.48% with Zastron occurring in the highest amount and Nudosa at the lowest level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). American Giant, Ficus-Indice, Morado, Robusta, Tormentosa, van As and Zastron also attained PUFA/SFA contents above 4%. Zastron was also amongst those that had the highest content of C18:2c9,12, while Nudosa occurred at the lowest level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). <italic>O. dillenii</italic> presented a ratio of 3.22.</p>
					<p>The results for the physicochemical properties of the oil from cactus pear cultivars are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Physicochemical properties of oil from 12 selected cold-pressed cactus pear cultivars analyzed one week after pressing.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">Cultivar</th>
									<th align="center">Peroxide Value (meq O2/1000 g fat)</th>
									<th align="center">% Free Fatty Acids</th>
									<th align="center">&#x3c1;-Anisidine value (mmol/kg)</th>
									<th align="center">Refraction Index at 40 &#x2da;C</th>
									<th align="center">Iodine Value</th>
									<th align="center">&#x3b2; + &#x3b3; Tocopherol (mg/100g)</th>
									<th align="center">ORAC<sup>1</sup>
									</th>
									<th align="center">OSI<sup>2</sup>
									</th>
									<th align="center">Induction Time extrapolated to 25 &#x2da;C (Years)</th>
									<th align="center">Induction Time extrapolated to 30 &#x2da;C (Years)</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Algerian</td>
									<td align="center">4.23 &#xb1; 0.48</td>
									<td align="center">3.21 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">4.08 &#xb1; 0.37</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">121.60 &#xb1; 4.12</td>
									<td align="center">58.27 &#xb1; 2.47</td>
									<td align="center">5.28 &#xb1; 0.43</td>
									<td align="center">2.31 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.52 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">American Giant</td>
									<td align="center">3.02 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">1.21 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">1.37 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">125.45 &#xb1; 2.09</td>
									<td align="center">54.19 &#xb1; 2.96</td>
									<td align="center">4.70 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
									<td align="center">2.19 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
									<td align="center">3.44 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.08 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ficus-Indice</td>
									<td align="center">3.65 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">2.19 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">2.73 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">123.84 &#xb1; 2.09</td>
									<td align="center">59.36 &#xb1; 7.61</td>
									<td align="center">4.54 &#xb1; 0.27</td>
									<td align="center">3.17 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.73 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.49 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Gymno Carpo</td>
									<td align="center">5.87 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">2.32 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.00 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">122.32 &#xb1; 0.60</td>
									<td align="center">55.43 &#xb1; 6.05</td>
									<td align="center">4.10 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
									<td align="center">2.54 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.69 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.66 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Meyers</td>
									<td align="center">4.81 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
									<td align="center">1.63 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">1.42 &#xb1; 0.32</td>
									<td align="center">1.4664 &#xb1; 0.0003</td>
									<td align="center">123.07 &#xb1; 1.17</td>
									<td align="center">59.78&#xb1; 2.04</td>
									<td align="center">3.87&#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">1.88&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">4.15&#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.46&#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Morado</td>
									<td align="center">4.19 &#xb1; 0.24</td>
									<td align="center">1.15 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.40 &#xb1; 0.42</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">123.32 &#xb1; 0.28</td>
									<td align="center">61.31 &#xb1; 3.33</td>
									<td align="center">4.01 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
									<td align="center">2.46 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">2.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.33 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Nudosa</td>
									<td align="center">4.49 &#xb1; 1.24</td>
									<td align="center">1.74 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">1.58 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
									<td align="center">1.4659 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">123.92 &#xb1; 6.36</td>
									<td align="center">51.69 &#xb1; 4.26</td>
									<td align="center">4.14 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">2.95 &#xb1; 0.10</td>
									<td align="center">2.74 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.69 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Ofer</td>
									<td align="center">4.72 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.19 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">1.64 &#xb1; 0.36</td>
									<td align="center">1.4666 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">122.64 &#xb1; 1.18</td>
									<td align="center">61.47 &#xb1; 1.65</td>
									<td align="center">4.30 &#xb1; 0.49</td>
									<td align="center">2.92 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">1.64 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.04 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Robusta</td>
									<td align="center">5.06 &#xb1; 0.78</td>
									<td align="center">3.41 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
									<td align="center">1.95 &#xb1; 0.54</td>
									<td align="center">1.4665 &#xb1; 0.0002</td>
									<td align="center">122.85 &#xb1; 3.85</td>
									<td align="center">55.30 &#xb1; 9.38</td>
									<td align="center">5.07 &#xb1; 0.51</td>
									<td align="center">2.25 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">3.56 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.16 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Tormentosa</td>
									<td align="center">5.80 &#xb1; 0.38</td>
									<td align="center">3.22 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
									<td align="center">0.98 &#xb1; 0.54</td>
									<td align="center">1.4664 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">120.58 &#xb1; 2.22</td>
									<td align="center">58.45 &#xb1; 4.70</td>
									<td align="center">4.20 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
									<td align="center">1.91 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
									<td align="center">9.40 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">5.30 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Van As</td>
									<td align="center">3.60 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
									<td align="center">4.30 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
									<td align="center">2.94 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
									<td align="center">1.4664 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">120.59 &#xb1; 1.93</td>
									<td align="center">59.95 &#xb1; 5.74</td>
									<td align="center">5.08 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
									<td align="center">1.78 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
									<td align="center">2.14 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.31 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Zastron</td>
									<td align="center">5.72 &#xb1; 0.58</td>
									<td align="center">2.75 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
									<td align="center">1.94 &#xb1; 0.55</td>
									<td align="center">1.4668 &#xb1; 0.0001</td>
									<td align="center">127.43 &#xb1; 1.13</td>
									<td align="center">56.70 &#xb1; 1.37</td>
									<td align="center">5.37 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
									<td align="center">1.74 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
									<td align="center">4.73 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
									<td align="center">2.76 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>Values in the Table are mean &#xb1;SD of triplicate analyses.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>1 Oxygen radical antioxidant capacity (&#xb5;mol Trolox equivalents/g)</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p>2 Oxidative stability Index at 110 &#x2da;C (Hour)</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.2.3">
					<label>3.2.3.</label>
					<title>Refraction index (RI)</title>
					<p>The RI values of the oils increase as a result of autoxidation. The RI depends on the chemical composition and temperature of the oil. It also increases with degree of saturation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brahmi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) and secondary functions on fatty acid chains. As indicated by the RI values presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>, little differences were observed among the RI values for all cultivars. The RI values ranged from 1.4659-1.4668 (Nudosa and Zastron). The higher the level of unsaturation, the higher the levels of RI and IV, for example, Zastron obtained the highest RI value (1.4668) and high PUFA content (66.08%) as well as high IV (127.43). Oils with a high unsaturation degree are more likely to undergo autoxidation and tend to oxidize easily when used at high temperatures, for example, PUFA (C18:2c9,12) oxidized &#xb1; 50 times faster than C18:1c9 (MUFA). Therefore, an increased RI value could be expected as a result of exposure to heat and light.</p>
					<p>American Giant and Gymno Carpo were also amongst the cultivars with high PUFA, RI value and IV value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tables 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">3</xref>). Furthermore, the higher the MUFA content (C18:1c9), the lower the RI and IV-values, for example, Van As attained a higher content of MUFA (23.14%), a low RI value of 1.4664 as well as a low IV value of 120.59 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tables 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">3</xref>). These results fall within a similar range (1.464 RI) to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gharby <italic>et al</italic>. (2011)</xref>. Previous literature reported a higher RI value of 1.4831 in cactus pear seed oil, 1.473 in rape seed oil, and 1.475 in <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ennouri <italic>et al</italic>., 2005</xref>). Other studies reported slightly lower RI values ranging between 1.4658 and 1.4676 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">de Wit <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). </p>
					<p>Valuable information can be obtained by determining the density of the oils. Density gives information on the nature of fatty acids, such as chain length, unsaturation degree, and functional groups. Density will also be influenced by the composition and temperature of the oil. Together with RI, it can also indicate the purity of the oil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brahmi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). It is therefore recommended to include density analyses in future studies.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.2.4">
					<label>3.2.4.</label>
					<title>Iodine value (IV)</title>
					<p>Iodine value is an indication of the total number of double bonds. The iodine value (IV) ranged from 120.58-127.43 (Tormentosa and Zastron). Zastron obtained the highest IV (number of gram iodine absorbed by 100g of oil) of 127.43 followed by American Giant (125.45), Morado (123.32) and Nudosa (123.92). Tormentosa recorded the lowest IV of 120.58 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>, Zastron and American Giant attained the highest PUFAs (high unsaturation level) as well as high IV and low MUFA content while Nudosa obtained the smallest content of PUFA. The values in this study are higher than those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Karleskind and Wolff (1992)</xref> ranging from 105.5-107.38 (cactus pear seed oils). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">De Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> reported slightly lower iodine values ranging between 110.68 (Nudosa) and 126.82 (Robusta). </p>
					<p>Since IV measures the unsaturation of oils, it can also be an indication of the stability of the oil since a high degree of unsaturation suggests a high susceptibility to oxidation. Low IV therefore indicates more resistance to oxidation because of increased saturation and vice versa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">de Wit <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.2.5">
					<label>3.2.5.</label>
					<title>Tocopherols</title>
					<p>Vegetable oils are the most important dietary source of tocopherols. Tocopherols are phenolic compounds that are naturally occurring antioxidants that present biological activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali Alsaad <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fern&#xe1;ndez-Martinez <italic>et al</italic>. (2004)</xref> indicated that fatty acids, natural antioxidants, tocopherols and sterols are the key constituents that define oil quality. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Normand <italic>et al</italic>. (2006)</xref> stated that oils with high tocopherols have greater stability to oxidation. Tocopherols are natural antioxidants in plant foods, particularly those that contain high levels of PUFA as they are able to scavenge lipid peroxyl radicals of unsaturated lipid molecules, inhibiting the propagation of lipid peroxidation. </p>
					<p> &#x3b2; and &#x3b3; tocopherols ranged between 61.47 and 51.69 mg/100g (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Ofer obtained a higher content of &#x3b2; and &#x3b3; tocopherols (51.69 mg/100g) followed by Morado (61.31 mg/100g), which means that Ofer and Morado will be more stable to oxidation compared to Nudosa (51.69 mg/100g). The values obtained in the current study are comparable to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu <italic>et al</italic>. (2002)</xref> with cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil at 94.6 mg/100g, argan oil at 85.0 mg/100g, olive oil at 22.0 mg/100g, soybean at 65.0 mg/100g and sunflower oil at 49.0 mg/100g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Morales <italic>et al</italic>. (2012)</xref> found values of 140-220 &#xb5;g/100 g.</p>
					<p>Tocopherol contents are influenced by the extraction method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Loizzo <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Red cultivars were found to contain higher contents than the yellow cultivars and were mainly in the form of &#x3b3;-tocopherol. In Moroccan cactus pear seed oil, vitamin E was only present as &#x3b3;-tocopherol (1.23%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ghazi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Regalado-Renter&#xed;a <italic>et al</italic>. (2018)</xref> found a tendency for metabolites such as &#x3b3;-tocopherol to be higher in cold-pressed oils than oils extracted with solvents. These authors reported &#x3b3;-tocopherol values between 1.71 and 13.86 mg/100 g oil. During the analysis of anti-inflammatory compounds of <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> seed oils from Saudi-Arabia, &#x3b2;-tocopherol contents of 1.56% were found. This oil was extracted with hexane (Boshak <italic>et al</italic>., 2020).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.2.6">
					<label>3.2.6.</label>
					<title>Oxygen radical antioxidant capacity (ORAC)</title>
					<p>Lipid oxidation is a process which is initiated by free radical reactions at the double bonds of unsaturated fatty acids and has been reported to be the key factor in the quality deterioration of edible oils since it modifies the chemical, sensory and nutritional properties of the oils. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">M&#xe1;rquez-Ruiz <italic>et al</italic>. (1996)</xref> pointed out that autoxidation is another key factor that leads to the development of quality loss in refined oils during storage. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay is normally used to predict the stability of cold-pressed oils against oxidation. Most of the literature cited included the use of the DPPH and 2,2&#x2019;-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) methods. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cao <italic>et al</italic>. (1996)</xref> reported the determination of total antioxidant capacity using the ORAC method, which is currently being used to determine the total antioxidant capacity and measures the plant extract&#x2019;s ability to scavenge peroxyl radicals.</p>
					<p>The oxidation of oils happens mainly at the sites of unsaturation and the oxidation rate mainly depends on the number of double bonds and their positions. <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> shows that Zastron had the highest antioxidant capacity with an ORAC value of 5.37 &#x3bc;mol/g, followed by Algerian with 5.28 &#x3bc;mol/g. Meyers had the lowest antioxidant capacity (3.87 &#x3bc;mol/g). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kuti (2004)</xref> reported higher values which ranged from 1.6-15.8 mMTE/g in yellow-skinned fruits and 1.7-49.2 mMTE/g in the purple-skinned fruits. </p>
					<p>It was found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> that extraction solvent had a significant effect on the free radical scavenging capacity of the seed oil and that the green <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> variety had a higher antioxidant activity regardless of the solvent used. The antioxidant activity of <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> seed oil from Saudi-Arabia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brahmi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) showed a lower DPPH value in cold-pressed oil than in oils extracted by the Soxhlet method. Antioxidant activity was strongly correlated with the amounts of phenolic compounds, including polyphenols and flavonoids. <italic>O. dillenii</italic> seed oil from Iraq demonstrated a strong antioxidant capability due to its ability to reduce oxidation as determined by the DPPH method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali Alsaad <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>), which reinforced the effect of variety on antioxidant activity.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.3">
				<label>3.3.</label>
				<title>Determination of oxidative stability</title>
				<sec id="sec3.3.1">
					<label>3.3.1.</label>
					<title>Free fatty acids (FFA)</title>
					<p>The level of free fatty acids (FFA) in oils is measured by the acid value (AV) generated upon the hydrolytic degradation of lipid particles and is therefore an indicator of hydrolytic activity, which consequently adds to the decrease in the time span of usability of the oil. The maximum FFA content limit recommended for cold-pressed oil is 8%, 0.3% for refined oils and 5% for virgin palm oils according to the Codex Alimentarius Commission standard (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2009</xref>). According to the results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>, the FFA content ranged between 1.15 and 4.30% (Morado and Van As) and the % FFA of all cultivars was within the recommended limit, implying that cactus pear seed oil is of good quality from a FFA point of view. In a previous study, % FFA ranged between 2.49 and 5.08% in chemically extracted oil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">de Wit <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). The content in cold-pressed oil was thus lower. The production of FFA is a result of lipid hydrolysis which is triggered by chemical or enzymatic actions. Increased free fatty acid values are indicators of increased primary oxidation. Factors such as high temperature and humidity are accountable for an increase in FFA content in oils. An elevated acidity value of 21.2% was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brahmi <italic>et al.</italic> (2020)</xref> for Algerian cold-pressed <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> seed oil. This high value could be ascribed to the enzymatic hydrolysis of seeds during oil pressing, handling or processing, as well as elevated temperatures and the presence of water during the process. It was also mentioned by the authors that free fatty acids could be present since no refining of the oil took place, which could possibly remove acids as impurities.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.3.2">
					<label>3.3.2.</label>
					<title>Peroxide value (PV)</title>
					<p>
						<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mart&#xed;n-Polvillo <italic>et al</italic>. (2004)</xref> reported that peroxide value (PV) measures the level of hydroperoxide in the oil and is a valuable tool for the indication of a commencement period of oxidation. Furthermore, PV reaches the highest level during the progression of oxidation and following this stage (secondary oxidation), the decomposition rate of hydroperoxides surpasses the rate of their development. Peroxide value is also used to test oxidative rancidity in oils and fats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Karleskind and Wolff, 1992</xref>). It was reported that the acceptable PV value for cold pressed oil is &lt; 15 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1999</xref>). According to the results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>, all cultivars attained PV values of &lt; 15 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>, therefore PV value results are in agreement with the recommended value for cold-pressed oil of good quality.</p>
					<p>PV ranged between 3.02 and 5.87. Although Gymno Carpo and Tormentosa were amongst the cultivars with higher PV values (5.87 and 5.80), oxidation had not yet occurred in these cultivars since their PV values were still within the recommended limit of &lt; 15 meq O<sub>2</sub>.kg<sup>-1</sup>, which indicates that a rancid taste was not yet noticeable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Salvo <italic>et al</italic>. (2002)</xref> pointed out that a rancid taste in oils begins to be noticeable at PV values of 20-40 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>. PUFAs are more susceptible to oxidation than MUFA and SFA. The higher PVs observed for Gymno Carpo and Tormentosa were probably a consequence of their higher unsaturation levels (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Tables 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">2</xref>). American Giant had on average a PV of 3.02 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>, which was the lowest compared to that of the other cultivars. Van As also had a relatively low PV value of 3.60 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">De Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> reported PV values of chemically extracted cactus pear oils which were above the recommended limit and ranged between 9.5 and 23.30 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
					<p>
						<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Karleskind and Wolff (1992)</xref> reported PV estimations of margarine containing <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> oil which were far below the levels permitted by the international benchmarks and ranged between 0.38 and 0.39 meq O<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>. PV measures the extent of rancidity reactions during storage, and therefore indicates quality and stability. A PV of 12 meqO<sub>2</sub>/kg was reported for Algerian <italic>O. ficus-indica</italic> cold-pressed seed oils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Koshak <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). PV is therefore affected by genetics, cultivars, growth conditions, soil geography, and harvesting routines as well as handling and storage.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.3.3">
					<label>3.3.3.</label>
					<title>&#x3c1;-Anisidine value (&#x3c1;-AV)</title>
					<p>The <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV was taken as a tool used to quantify secondary oxidation by surveying the measurement of unsaturated aldehydes as a result of the decomposition of hydroperoxides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Shahidi and Zhong, 2005</xref>). The <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV is an indicator of oxidative rancidity in oils. The results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> demonstrate that the <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV ranged between 0.98-4.08 mmol/kg for Tormentosa and Algerian, respectively. Algerian had the highest <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV of 4.08 followed by Van As with <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV of 2.94 mmol/kg. Tormentosa acquired the lowest <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV content of 0.99 mmol/kg. The results demonstrated that there were only small differences among the <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV of American Giant (1.37), Morado (1.40), Ofer (1.64) and Nudosa (1.58). Algerian recorded the highest &#x3c1;-Anisidine value and PV value, which is indicative of secondary oxidation products. The high <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV may be due to their higher level of unsaturation. The recommended <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine value (<italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV) limit is &lt; 10.0 mmol/kg (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1999</xref>). The <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV values obtained were within the acceptable limit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Some of these <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV values were higher than those reported in the literature which ranged from 0.02 - 3.73 mmol/kg (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">de Wit <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). Aldehydes made up the highest percentage of cactus pear seed oil volatiles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). Aldehydes are responsible for, among others, acrid, burnt-fat, fruit-like, fermented, nutty, deep fat, butter, chicken and fusty odors, flavors and smells. The butyric acid reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karabagias <italic>et al</italic>. (2020)</xref> is responsible for the buttery flavor of the cactus pear seed oil.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.3.4">
					<label>3.3.4.</label>
					<title>Oxidative stability index</title>
					<p>The OSI value gives an indication of the resistance of lipids to oxidation and is also used for quality control of the oils, as well as an indication of the shelf-life of oils. The shorter the reaction time, the more susceptible the oil is to oxidation and therefore higher values will imply more resistance to oxidation. The values ranged between 1.78 and 3.17 h and were lower than the values obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">de Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, which ranged between 1.79 and 4.15 h. Ficus-Indice had the highest OSI value of 3.17 hours at 110 &#xb0;C followed by Nudosa (2.92 hours) and Ofer (2.92 hours), implying that these cultivars were more resistant to oxidation reactions. Van As, which attained the highest content of C18:1c9 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), was determined to be the most favored oil since it is rich in oleic acid and oils rich in C18:1c9 have potential for combining the hypocholesterolemic effect and greater oxidative stability. Oils which are high in MUFA (C18:1c9) such as Nudosa (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>) are less susceptible to oxidative degradation and in this manner indicate potential for applications requiring high oxidative stability. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gharby <italic>et al</italic>. (2011)</xref> reported OSI of 7 hours at 110 &#xb0;C for <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic>, 31.23 hours for argan, 7.5 hours for olive oil and 5 hours for soybean and sunflower oil. </p>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.3.5">
					<label>3.3.5.</label>
					<title>Extrapolation of induction time</title>
					<p>Induction time extrapolated to 25 and 30 &#xb0;C was done to predict the shelf-life of the oils based on OSI using Rancimat induction times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rancimat Manual, 2009</xref>). The induction period is an indication of how long the oils will take to reach an end point or be oxidized. American Giant is presented as an example in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>. Induction time is also described as the time taken before the rapid increase in oxidation occurs and is used to make relative assessments on oxidative stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gharby <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>). </p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Predicted shelf-life of American Giant cold-pressed cactus pear seed oil stored at 25 and 30 &#xba;C.</title>
							<p>The extrapolation function of the Rancimat 743 apparatus was used to predict induction times at 25 and 30 &#xba;C according to the formula: Predicted induction time = A X e <sup>(BXT)</sup></p>
						</caption>
						<graphic id="gra-2" xlink:href="GYA-72-03-e415-gf2.png"/>
					</fig>
					<p>The accelerated testing can then be extrapolated to real time conditions. Algerian was found to have a shorter induction time of 5 months, 2 weeks when extrapolated to 25 &#xb0;C and 3 months, 5 weeks when extrapolated to 30 &#xb0;C, implying that Algerian will have a shorter shelf-life compared to Tormentosa, with an anticipated time span of usability of 9 years and 4 months when extrapolated to 25 &#xb0;C and 5 years 3 months when extrapolated to 30 &#xb0;C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.4">
				<label>3.4.</label>
				<title>Pearson correlation analysis</title>
				<p>A Pearson correlation analysis was conducted on fatty acid content, fatty acid ratios, physicochemical properties and OSI to establish the relationship among them (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). A significant (p &lt; 0.001) negative correlation (-0.6757) was observed between % FFA and OSI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). This means that cultivars which recorded high contents in % FFA had decreased OSI values or vice versa. This was observed in cultivars such as Algerian which attained a high content in % FFA (3.21%) and low OSI (2.31 h). Nudosa and Ofer possessed the lowest contents in % FFA and obtained the highest OSI values of 2.95 and 2.92 h. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">De Wit <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref> reported higher % FFA results ranging from 2.49% (Tormentosa) with OSI of 3.91h - 5.08h (Algerian) with OSI of 4.15h and the % FFA was higher than the recommended limit, implying that there was increased primary oxidation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">El Mannoubi <italic>et al</italic>. (2009)</xref> reported much lower % FFA results for cactus pear oil with 0.64%. </p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Pearson correlation analysis of the of the fatty acid content, fatty acid ratios, physicochemical properties and oxidative stability index, induction time extrapolated to 25 &#xb0;C and induction time extrapolated to 30 &#xb0;C of oil from selected cold-pressed cactus pear cultivars.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2"> </th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">OSI </th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">Induction time extrapolated to 25 &#xba;C </th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">Induction time extrapolated to 30 &#xba;C </th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Correlation coefficient (r)</th>
								<th align="center">Significance level (P)</th>
								<th align="center">Correlation coefficient (r)</th>
								<th align="center">Significance level (P)</th>
								<th align="center">Correlation coefficient (r)</th>
								<th align="center">Significance level (P)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Physicochemical properties:</td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">OSI (Oxidative stability index)</td>
								<td align="center">1.0000</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-0.4616</td>
								<td align="center">0.0154</td>
								<td align="center">-0.4539</td>
								<td align="center">0.0174</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Induction time extrapolated to 25 &#xba;C</td>
								<td align="center">-0.4616</td>
								<td align="center">0.0154</td>
								<td align="center">1.0000</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">0.9996</td>
								<td align="center">P&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Induction time extrapolated to 30 &#xba;C</td>
								<td align="center">-0.4539</td>
								<td align="center">0.0174</td>
								<td align="center">0.9996</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">1.0000</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">% Oil</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1197</td>
								<td align="center">0.4869</td>
								<td align="center">0.1768</td>
								<td align="center">0.3024</td>
								<td align="center">0.1785</td>
								<td align="center">0.2975</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">PV (Peroxide Value)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0620</td>
								<td align="center">0.7585</td>
								<td align="center">0.4585</td>
								<td align="center">0.0161</td>
								<td align="center">0.4569</td>
								<td align="center">0.0166</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">% FFA (Free Fatty Acids)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.6757</td>
								<td align="center">0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.2063</td>
								<td align="center">0.3019</td>
								<td align="center">0.1915</td>
								<td align="center">0.3387</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">
									<italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine value</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1927</td>
								<td align="center">0.3355</td>
								<td align="center">-0.5120</td>
								<td align="center">0.0063</td>
								<td align="center">-0.5297</td>
								<td align="center">0.0045</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">RI (Refraction Index)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.4080</td>
								<td align="center">0.0346</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0312</td>
								<td align="center">0.8771</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0351</td>
								<td align="center">0.8619</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">IV (Iodine Value)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0209</td>
								<td align="center">0.9174</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0180</td>
								<td align="center">0.9289</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0086</td>
								<td align="center">0.9661</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">&#x3b2; + &#x3b3; Tocopherol</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1383</td>
								<td align="center">0.4915</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0747</td>
								<td align="center">0.7113</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0845</td>
								<td align="center">0.6753</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ORAC (Oxygen radical antioxidant capacity)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.5762</td>
								<td align="center">0.0017</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1644</td>
								<td align="center">0.4125</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1749</td>
								<td align="center">0.3828</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">
									<bold>Fatty acid composition (%)</bold>
								</td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C14:0 (Myristic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">0.2984</td>
								<td align="center">0.1306</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2782</td>
								<td align="center">0.1600</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2819</td>
								<td align="center">0.1542</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C16:0 (Palmitic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">0.7409</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">-0.3072</td>
								<td align="center">0.1191</td>
								<td align="center">-0.3024</td>
								<td align="center">0.1253</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C16:1c9 (Palmitelaidic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">0.6522</td>
								<td align="center">0.0002</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2109</td>
								<td align="center">0.2911</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2114</td>
								<td align="center">0.2897</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C17:0 (Margaric acid)</td>
								<td align="center">0.1186</td>
								<td align="center">0.5556</td>
								<td align="center">0.2461</td>
								<td align="center">0.2159</td>
								<td align="center">0.2517</td>
								<td align="center">0.2053</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C17:1c10 (Heptadecenoic)</td>
								<td align="center">0.5690</td>
								<td align="center">0.0020</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1896</td>
								<td align="center">0.3435</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1870</td>
								<td align="center">0.3503</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:0 (Stearic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1058</td>
								<td align="center">0.5994</td>
								<td align="center">0.0253</td>
								<td align="center">0.9001</td>
								<td align="center">0.0273</td>
								<td align="center">0.8926</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:1c9 (Oleic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0415</td>
								<td align="center">0.8370</td>
								<td align="center">0.2614</td>
								<td align="center">0.1879</td>
								<td align="center">0.2620</td>
								<td align="center">0.1867</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:1c7 (Vaccenic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0,0554</td>
								<td align="center">0.7632</td>
								<td align="center">0.1345</td>
								<td align="center">0.2356</td>
								<td align="center">0.1643</td>
								<td align="center">0,3672</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:2c9,12,16 (Linoleic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2590</td>
								<td align="center">0.1920</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1425</td>
								<td align="center">0.4783</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1455</td>
								<td align="center">0.4691</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:0 (Arachidic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">0.0453</td>
								<td align="center">0.8224</td>
								<td align="center">0.0691</td>
								<td align="center">0.7321</td>
								<td align="center">0.0741</td>
								<td align="center">0.7135</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:1 (Eicosenoic)</td>
								<td align="center">-0,0438</td>
								<td align="center">0.8141</td>
								<td align="center">0.1290</td>
								<td align="center">0.3452</td>
								<td align="center">0.2645</td>
								<td align="center">0.3176</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:3c9,12,15 (&#x3b1;-Linolenic acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0447</td>
								<td align="center">0.8249</td>
								<td align="center">0.1267</td>
								<td align="center">0.5290</td>
								<td align="center">0.1269</td>
								<td align="center">0.5283</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:3c8,11,14 (Eicosatrienoic)</td>
								<td align="center">0.2705</td>
								<td align="center">0.1723</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0230</td>
								<td align="center">0.9093</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0172</td>
								<td align="center">0.9320</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:3c11,14,17 (Eicosatrienoic)</td>
								<td align="center">0.3698</td>
								<td align="center">0.0576</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2043</td>
								<td align="center">0.3066</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1959</td>
								<td align="center">0.3275</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C24:0 (Lignoceric acid)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1651</td>
								<td align="center">0.4106</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0583</td>
								<td align="center">0.7727</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0671</td>
								<td align="center">0.7393</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">
									<bold>Fatty acid ratios (%)</bold>
								</td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="left"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">SFA (Saturated fatty acids)</td>
								<td align="center">0.7230</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">-0.3033</td>
								<td align="center">0.1241</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2977</td>
								<td align="center">0.1315</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">MUFA (Monounsaturated fatty acids)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0150</td>
								<td align="center">0.9409</td>
								<td align="center">0.2517</td>
								<td align="center">0.2053</td>
								<td align="center">0.2524</td>
								<td align="center">0.2041</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">PUFA (Polyunsaturated fatty acids)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2512</td>
								<td align="center">0.2062</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1450</td>
								<td align="center">0.4706</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1477</td>
								<td align="center">0.4622</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">n-6 (Omega-6)</td>
								<td align="center">-0.2562</td>
								<td align="center">0.1970</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1438</td>
								<td align="center">0.4743</td>
								<td align="center">-0.1467</td>
								<td align="center">0.4653</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">n-3 (Omega-3)</td>
								<td align="center">0.1962</td>
								<td align="center">0.3267</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0220</td>
								<td align="center">0.9131</td>
								<td align="center">-0.0165</td>
								<td align="center">0.9349</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">PUFA/SFA ratio</td>
								<td align="center">-0.7146</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">0.1709</td>
								<td align="center">0.3942</td>
								<td align="center">0.1658</td>
								<td align="center">0.4085</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
				<p>No significant correlations with OSI were observed for PV, % Oil, <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine value, Refraction Index or &#x3b2; + &#x3b3; Tocopherols. A significant (p &lt; 0.01) negative correlation (-0.5762) was observed between OSI and ORAC. An increase in ORAC initiated a decrease in the OSI value. This correlation was especially observed in Zastron and Algerian, whereby high ORAC values were observed for these cultivars along with low OSI values. This correlation shows that these cultivars are less stable to oxidation due to their higher degree of unsaturation. Both C16:0, C16:1c9 and C17:1c10 correlated significantly (p &lt; 0.001, p = 0.001 and p &lt;0.01) with OSI, as in Nudosa, which obtained the highest content of C16:0 (15.22%) and the highest content of SFA (18.68%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Tables 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">2</xref>). </p>
				<p>A significant (p &lt; 0.001) positive correlation (0.7409) was observed between C16:0 and OSI. This effect was observed for Nudosa, which obtained the highest content of C16:0 with 15.22% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) as well as the highest OSI value of 2.95 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). A significant (p &lt; 0.001) positive correlation (0.7230) was observed between OSI and SFA. An increase in SFA initiated an increase in OSI as in Nudosa, which had the highest SFA (18.68%, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>) with a high OSI value (2.95 h, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). </p>
				<p>C16:1c9 and C17:1c10 had a positive (0.6522 and 0.5690) significant (p = 0.001 and p &lt; 0.01) correlation with the OSI. This effect was observed for Nudosa which obtained high C16:1c9 (0.75%) and C17:1c10 (0.05%) contents with OSI value of 2.95h. A negative (-0.7146) significant (p &lt; 0.001) correlation between PUFA/SFA and OSI value existed. This effect was observed for Zastron, Van As and American Giant, which possessed the highest contents of PUFA/SFA (4.45%, 4.03% and 4.11%, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>) and obtained the lowest value of OSI (1.74 h, 1.78 h and 2.19 h, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). With cold-pressing Algerian, American Giant and Ficus-Indice obtained the highest contents of C18:2c9,12 which resulted in a low oxidative stability index and made them less stable to oxidation. However, of these four cultivars, only American Giant had a low % FFA. The reason for the low OSI is the % FFA and the lower unsaturation level (secondary importance). Oil with high unsaturation is most likely to experience autoxidation. </p>
				<p>As expected, a significant (p &lt; 0.001) positive correlation (0.9996) was observed between OSI and induction time extrapolated to 25 &#xb0;C and 30 &#xb0;C. The length of induction time depends on the level of unsaturation of oil. Tormentosa recorded the highest predicted shelf-life at 25 and 30 &#xb0;C and was also amongst those cultivars that obtained the high MUFA (C18:1c9) content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tables 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">3</xref>). Oils with high MUFA contents (C18:1c9) are less susceptible to oxidation degradation and therefore these oils show great potential for applications requiring high oxidative stability. </p>
				<p>
					<italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine value had significant (p &lt; 0.01) negative correlations (-0.5120 and -0.5297) with induction time extrapolated to 25 and 30 &#xb0;C. This effect was observed for Algerian, which attained the lowest induction time extrapolated at both 25 and 30 &#xb0;C but recorded the highest <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-Anisidine value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). This cultivar is more likely to experience secondary oxidation (oxidative rancidity) due to its level of unsaturation (PUFA), hence it will have a shorter shelf-life.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec4" sec-type="conclusions">
			<label>4.</label>
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>The aim of the current study was to determine the oil content, fatty acid composition and physico-chemical quality parameters as well as the stability of cold-pressed seed oil from 12 commercially cultivated cultivars of cactus pear from the Bloemfontein, South Africa area. Large differences in oil content, fatty acid composition and physico-chemical properties (IV, PV, RI, tocopherols, ORAC, % FFA, OSI and induction time) were observed. The quality parameters of the oils were strongly influenced by the oil content, fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties. Quality traits were mainly compared to previous studies on chemically extracted oils from South African cactus pear seed oil. </p>
			<p>The main findings pointed out that cold-pressed oils yielded lower oil contents than chemically extracted oils, while green-colored fruit had the highest yields - indicating the effect of cultivar and species. The fatty acids showed similar profiles to those in chemically extracted oils, although the main fatty acid, linoleic acid (C18:2), content was lower. In general, lower PUFA and SFA contents and higher MUFA contents were observed than in the chemically extracted oils. RI, IV and <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>-AV was higher than observed in chemically extracted oils, while the PV, FFA and OSI were lower (shorter) - indicating good quality and stable oils. Tocopherol content and antioxidant activity contributed to stability and quality. Extrapolated induction times indicated a shelf-life of up to ~3.5 years when stored at 25 &#x2da;C. </p>
			<p>Overall, American Giant, Ofer, Van As, Zastron and Nudosa have proved to be the best performing cultivars in such a way that they contain the highest oil content, antioxidant capacity as well as greater stability to oxidation. Among all the cultivars, American Giant has showed to be the paramount cultivar with good quality traits (oil content and oxidative stability). </p>
			<p>Future research should focus on the measurement of total flavonoids, total phenolics and sterols, specifically &#x3b2;-sitosterol, as well as the composition of volatile compounds of seed oils. These would all attribute to regional and varietal identities of the oils. Further perspectives include application of the oils in food products, as well as measuring its ability to function as antioxidants and anti-microbial agents.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the following people and institutions: Dr. H.J. Fouch&#xe9; from the ARC for providing the fruit; Mr. Fanie Rautenbach from CPUT for his assistance with the tocopherol and ORAC tests; the ARC-UFS-DUT collaborative consortium for funding of the project.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ali Alsaad</surname>
							<given-names>AJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Altemimi</surname>
							<given-names>AB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aziz</surname>
							<given-names>SN</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lakhssassi</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Extraction and identification of cactus <italic>Opuntia dillenii</italic> seed oil and its added value for human health benefits</article-title>
					<source>Pharmacog. J.</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.phcogj.com/v11/i3">http://www.phcogj.com/v11/i3</ext-link>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5530/pj.2019.3</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<abbrev>AOAC</abbrev>
					<year>2000</year>
					<chapter-title>Oils and fats</chapter-title>
					<source>AOAC International Official Methods of Analysis</source>
					<edition>17th</edition>
					<publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Gaithersburg</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Astiasar&#xe1;n</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Candela</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<chapter-title>Edible fats</chapter-title>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Astiasar&#xe1;n</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Food Composition and Properties</source>
					<edition>2nd</edition>
					<publisher-name>McGraw-Hill Interamericana</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Madrid</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>109</fpage>
					<lpage>133</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Boskou</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Edible cold pressed oils and their biologically active compounds</article-title>
					<source>J. Exp. Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<elocation-id>1000e108</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4172/2472-0542.1000e108</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Brahmi</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Haddad</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bouamara</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yalaoui-Guellal</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Prost-Camus</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pais de Barros</surname>
							<given-names>JP</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Prost</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Atanasov</surname>
							<given-names>AG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Madani</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Boulekbache-Makhlouf</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lizard</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Comparison of chemical composition and biological activities of Algerian seed oils of <italic>Pistacia lentiscus</italic> L., <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> (L.) mill. and <italic>Argania spinosa</italic> L. skeels</article-title>
					<source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source>
					<volume>151</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>12</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112456</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cao</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sofic</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Prior</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Antioxidant capacity of tea and common vegetables</article-title>
					<source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<fpage>3426</fpage>
					<lpage>3431</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf9602535</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Choe</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Min</surname>
							<given-names>DB</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Mechanisms and factors for edible oil oxidation</article-title>
					<source>Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>169</fpage>
					<lpage>186</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.00009.x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chougui</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tamendjari</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamidj</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hallal</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barras</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Richard</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Larbat</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Oil composition and characterization of phenolic compounds of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seeds</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>193</volume>
					<fpage>796</fpage>
					<lpage>803</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chahdoura</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barreira</surname>
							<given-names>JCM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barros</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Santos-Buelga</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>ICFR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Achour</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Seeds of <italic>Opuntia</italic> spp. as a novel high potential by-product: Phytochemical characterization and antioxidant activity</article-title>
					<source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source>
					<volume>65</volume>
					<fpage>383</fpage>
					<lpage>389</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.011</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chu</surname>
							<given-names>BS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Baharin</surname>
							<given-names>BS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Quek</surname>
							<given-names>SY</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Factors affecting pre- concentration of tocopherols and tocotrienols from palm fatty acid distillate by lipase-catalysed hydrolysis</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>79</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>55</fpage>
					<lpage>59</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ciriminna</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bongiorno</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Scurria</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Danzi</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Timpanaro</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Delisi</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Avellone</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pagliaro</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Sicilian <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seed oil: fatty acid composition and bio-economical aspects</article-title>
					<source>Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>119</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.201700232</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Codex Alimentarius Commission</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<source>Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme</source>
					<publisher-name>Codex committee on fats and oils</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="standard">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Codex Alimentarius Commission</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<std>
						<source>Codex standard for named vegetable oils</source> - <std-organization>CODEX STAN</std-organization>
						<pub-id>210</pub-id>-<year>1999</year>
					</std>
					<publisher-name>Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation</publisher-name>
					<publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>
					<publisher-name>Codex Alimentarius Commission</publisher-name>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ennouri</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Evelyne</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Laurence</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamadi</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid composition and rheological behavior of prickly pear seed oils</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>93</volume>
					<fpage>431</fpage>
					<lpage>437</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.020</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Velasco</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Vich</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<source>Progress in the genetic modification of sunflower oil quality</source>
					<conf-name>16th International Sunflower Conference</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Fargo, ND, USA</conf-loc>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>14</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gharby</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Harhar</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Guillaume</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Haddad</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Matth&#xe4;us</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Charrouf</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Oxidative stability of edible argan oil: a two-year study</article-title>
					<source>LWT - Food Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2010.07.003</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ghazi</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ramdani</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fauconnier</surname>
							<given-names>ML</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>El Mahi</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cheikh</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acids sterols and vitamin E composition of seed oil of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> and <italic>Opuntia dillenii</italic> from Marocco</article-title>
					<source>J. Mater. Environ. Sci.</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>967</fpage>
					<lpage>972</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/156950">http://hdl.handle.net/2268/156950</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Izquierdo</surname>
							<given-names>NG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aguirrezabal</surname>
							<given-names>LAN</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>FH</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Geroudet</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Valentinuzand</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pereyra Iraola</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Intercepted solar radiation affects oil fatty acid composition in crop species</article-title>
					<source>Field Crop Res.</source>
					<volume>114</volume>
					<fpage>66</fpage>
					<lpage>74</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2009.07.007</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamilton</surname>
							<given-names>RJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamilton</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<source>Lipid analysis: a practical approach</source>
					<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hssaini</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hanine</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Charafi</surname>
							<given-names>j</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Razouk</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Elantari</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ennahli</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ouaabou</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>irst report on fatty acids composition, total phenolics and antioxidant activity in seeds oil of four fig cultivars (<italic>Ficus carica</italic> L.) grown in Marocco</article-title>
					<source>Oilseeds and Fats, Crops and Lipids (OCL)</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>10</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/ocl/2020003</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karabagias</surname>
							<given-names>VK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karabagias</surname>
							<given-names>IK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gatzias</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Badeka</surname>
							<given-names>AV</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Prickly pear seed oil by shelf-grown cactus fruits: waste or maste?</article-title>
					<source>Process</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<elocation-id>132</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pr8020132</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karleskind</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wolff</surname>
							<given-names>JP</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<source>Oils and fats manual: A comprehensive treatise - properties, production, application</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karleskind</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wolff</surname>
							<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<size units="pages">1527</size>
					<publisher-name>TEC and DOC Lavoisier</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>France</publisher-loc>
					<year>1996</year>
					<isbn>1-898298-08-4</isbn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/lipi.19970990608</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Koshak</surname>
							<given-names>AE</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Abdallah</surname>
							<given-names>HM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Esmat</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rateb</surname>
							<given-names>ME</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Anti-inflammatory activity and chemical characterization of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seed oil cultivated in Saudi-Arabia</article-title>
					<source>Arab. J. Sci. Eng.</source>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13369-020-04555-x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kuti</surname>
							<given-names>JO</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Antioxidant compounds from four <italic>Opuntia cactus</italic> pear fruit varieties</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>527</fpage>
					<lpage>533</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00184-5</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Labuschagne</surname>
							<given-names>MT</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hugo</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Oil content and fatty acid composition of cactus pear seed compared with cotton and grape seed</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Biochem.</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<fpage>93</fpage>
					<lpage>100</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1745-4514.2009.00266.x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lajara</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Diaz</surname>
							<given-names>U</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Quidiello</surname>
							<given-names>RD</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Definite influence of location and climatic conditions on the fatty acid composition of sunflower seed oil</article-title>
					<source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source>
					<volume>67</volume>
					<issue>10</issue>
					<fpage>618</fpage>
					<lpage>623</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02540410</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Loizzo</surname>
							<given-names>MR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bruno</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Balzano</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Giardinieri</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pacetti</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Frega</surname>
							<given-names>NG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sicari</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Leporini</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tundis</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Comparative chemical composition and bioactivity of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> Sanguigna and Surfarina seed oils obtained by traditional and ultrasound-assisted extraction procedures</article-title>
					<source>Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>121</volume>
					<elocation-id>1800283</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.201800283</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mannoubi</surname>
							<given-names>El I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barrek</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Skanji</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Casabianca</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zarrouk</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seed oil from Tunisia</article-title>
					<source>Chem. Nat. Comp.</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<fpage>616</fpage>
					<lpage>620</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10600-009-9448-1</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>M&#xe1;rquez-Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mart&#xed;n-Polvillo</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dobarganes</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Quantitation of oxidised triglyceride monomers and dimers as a useful measurement for early and advanced stages of oxidation</article-title>
					<source>Grasas Aceites</source>
					<volume>47</volume>
					<fpage>48</fpage>
					<lpage>53</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mart&#xed;n-Polvillo</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>M&#xe1;rquez-Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dobarganes</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Oxidative stability of sunflower oils differing in unsaturation degree during long-term storage at room temperature</article-title>
					<source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source>
					<volume>81</volume>
					<fpage>577</fpage>
					<lpage>583</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-006-0944-1</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barrionuevo</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nepote</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Grosso</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Maestri</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Sensory characterization and oxidative stability of walnut oil</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Food Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<fpage>1276</fpage>
					<lpage>1281</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02618.x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Morales</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sanchez-Mata</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>AM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>ICFR</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Nutritional and antioxidant properties of pulp and seeds of two xoconostle cultivars (<italic>Opuntia joconostle</italic> F.A.C. Weber ex Diguet and <italic>Opuntia matudae</italic> Scheinvar) of high consumption in Mexico</article-title>
					<source>Food Res. Int.</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<fpage>279</fpage>
					<lpage>285</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2011.12.031</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Naz</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sheikh</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Siddiqi</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sayeed</surname>
							<given-names>SA</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Oxidative stability of olive, corn and soybean oil under different conditions</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>253</fpage>
					<lpage>259</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.042</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Normand</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Eskin</surname>
							<given-names>NAM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Przybylski</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Comparison of the frying stability of regular and high oleic acid sunflower oils</article-title>
					<source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source>
					<volume>83</volume>
					<fpage>331</fpage>
					<lpage>334</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-006-1208-9</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="software">
					<abbrev>NCCS</abbrev>
					<source>Statistical Software NCSS</source>
					<version>11.0.20</version>
					<publisher-name>LLC</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Kaysville, Utah, USA</publisher-loc>
					<year>2018</year>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ncss.com/software/ncss">https://ncss.com/software/ncss</ext-link>
					<date-in-citation content-type="access-date" iso-8601-date="2018-11-01">1 November 2018</date-in-citation>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ortega-Ortega</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cruz-Cansino</surname>
							<given-names>SN</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Alan&#xed;s-Garc&#xed;a</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Delgado-Olivares</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ariza-Ortega</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>de Jes&#xfa;s Manr&#xed;quez-Torres</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Optimization of ultrasound extraction of cactus pear (<italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic>) seed oil based on antioxidant activity and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Qual.</source>
					<volume>2017</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>9</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/9315360</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pardo</surname>
							<given-names>JE</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernandez</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rubio</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Alvarruiz</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Alonso</surname>
							<given-names>GL</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of grape seed oil from different grape varieties (<italic>Vitis vinifera</italic>)</article-title>
					<source>Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>111</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>188</fpage>
					<lpage>193</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.200800052</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Park</surname>
							<given-names>PW</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Goins</surname>
							<given-names>RE</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>
						<italic>In situ</italic> preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for analysis of fatty acid composition in foods</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Sc.</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<fpage>1262</fpage>
					<lpage>1266</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pearson</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1973</year>
					<article-title>Alteration of dietary fatty acids by human intestinal bacteria</article-title>
					<source>Proc. Nutri. Soc.</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<fpage>8A</fpage>
					<lpage>9A</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Prior</surname>
							<given-names>RL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hoang</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gu</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bacchiocca</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Howard</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hampsch-Woodill</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ou</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jacob</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Assays for hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity (oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORACFL)) of plasma and other biological and food samples</article-title>
					<source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source>
					<volume>51</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>3273</fpage>
					<lpage>3279</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf0262256</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ram&#xed;rez-Moreno</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cari&#xf1;o-Cort&#xe9;s</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>del Socorro Cruz-Cansino</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Delgado-Olivares</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ariza-Ortega</surname>
							<given-names>LD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Monta&#xf1;ez-Izquierdo</surname>
							<given-names>VY</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez-Herrero</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Filardo-Kerstupp</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of cactus pear (<italic>Opuntia</italic>) seed oils</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Qual.</source>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/3075907</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="report">
					<source>Rancimat Manual</source>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Determination of the oxidative stability of the oils and fats</article-title>
					<publisher-name>Metrohm AG</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>CH-9101, Herisau, Switzerland</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Regalado-Renter&#xed;a</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aguirre-Rivera</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez-Ch&#xe1;vez</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>S&#xe1;nchez-S&#xe1;nchez</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mart&#xed;nez-Guti&#xe9;rrez</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ju&#xe1;rez-Flores</surname>
							<given-names>BI</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Assessment of extraction methods and biological value of seed oil from eight variants of prickly pear fruit (<italic>Opuntia</italic> spp.)</article-title>
					<source>Waste Biomass. Valor.</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12649-018-0409-4</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Salvo</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Galati</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lo Curto</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tripodo</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Study on the chemical characterization of lipid composition of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> L. seed oil</article-title>
					<source>Acta Hort.</source>
					<volume>581</volume>
					<fpage>283</fpage>
					<lpage>289</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.581.33</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Shahidi</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhong</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<chapter-title>Lipid oxidation: measurement methods</chapter-title>
					<source>Bailey&#x2019;s industrial oil and fat products</source>
					<edition>6th</edition>
					<publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons Incorporated</publisher-name>
					<fpage>357</fpage>
					<lpage>385</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sawaya</surname>
							<given-names>WN</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Khan</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>Chemical characterization of prickly pear seed oil, <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic>
					</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Sci.</source>
					<volume>47</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>2060</fpage>
					<lpage>2061</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb12946.x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tlili</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bargougui</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Elfalleh</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Triki</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nasri</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Phenolic compounds, protein, lipid content and fatty acids compositions of cactus seeds</article-title>
					<source>J. Med. Plants Res.</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>4519</fpage>
					<lpage>4524</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wit</surname>
							<given-names>M de</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hugo</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Shongwe</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Quality assessment of seed oil from selected cactus pear cultivars (<italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> and <italic>O. robusta</italic>
					</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Proc. Pres.</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<elocation-id>e12898</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfpp.12898</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B49">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wit</surname>
							<given-names>M de</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hugo</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Shongwe</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>South African cactus pear seed oil: a comprehensive study on 42 spineless Burbank <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> and <italic>Opuntia robusta</italic> cultivars</article-title>
					<source>Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech.</source>
					<volume>120</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<elocation-id>1700343</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.201700343</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B50">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zine</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gharby</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>El Hadek</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Physicochemical characterization of <italic>Opuntia ficus-indica</italic> seed oil from Morocco</article-title>
					<source>Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>99</fpage>
					<lpage>105</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13005/bbra/1099</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>