<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing-oasis-article1-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GYA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Grasas y Aceites</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Grasas y Aceites</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn publication-format="electronic">1988-4214</issn>
			<issn-l>0017-3495</issn-l>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#xed;ficas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">gya.0784211</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/gya.0784211</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Research</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Influence of grafting on fatty acid profile and some physicochemical properties of watermelon seed and seed oil</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>Influencia de un injerto en el perfil de &#xe1;cidos grasos y algunas propiedades fisicoqu&#xed;micas de la semilla y el aceite de semillas de sand&#xed;a</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-8290</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Aydo&#x11f;an-Co&#x15f;kun</surname>
						<given-names>B.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University, Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Food Engineering</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-1454</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Ercan</surname>
						<given-names>M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Bing&#xf6;l University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Engineering and Architecture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Food Engineering</institution>, <addr-line>Bing&#xf6;l</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-8293</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Akbulut</surname>
						<given-names>M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff3"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University, Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Food Engineering</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4948-0960</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>&#xc7;oklar</surname>
						<given-names>H.</given-names>
					</name>
					<email xlink:href="hacercoklar@selcuk.edu.tr">hacercoklar@selcuk.edu.tr</email>
					<aff id="aff4"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University, Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Food Engineering</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-137X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Seymen</surname>
						<given-names>M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff5"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Horticulture</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-6929</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Yavuz</surname>
						<given-names>D.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff6"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Irrigation</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-7430</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Kurtar</surname>
						<given-names>E.S.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff7"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Horticulture</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-0668</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Yavuz</surname>
						<given-names>N.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff8"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Irrigation</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6163-0706</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>S&#xfc;heri</surname>
						<given-names>S.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff9"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Irrigation</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3218-6551</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>T&#xfc;rkmen</surname>
						<given-names>&#xd6;.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff10"><institution>Sel&#xe7;uk University</institution>, <institution content-type="faculty">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution content-type="department">Department of Horticulture</institution>, <addr-line>Konya</addr-line>, <country>Turkey</country></aff>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>02</day>
				<month>08</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<month>09</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>73</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<elocation-id>e475</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>19</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>14</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="pub">
					<day>15</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>&#xa9;2022 CSIC</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="http://grasasyaceites.revistas.csic.es/index.php/grasasyaceites/article/view/XXXX/XXXX"/>
			<abstract>
				<title>Summary</title>
				<p> This study aimed to investigate the effects of grafting on the fatty acid profile and some physicochemical properties of watermelon seed and seed oil. The &#x2018;Crimson Tide&#x2019; cultivar was used as the scion while two wild watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic> (A1 and A2)), one <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> (A3) and one <italic>Cucurbita maxima</italic> Duchesne x <italic>Cucurbita moschata</italic> Duchesne (A4) were used as rootstocks. The use of rootstock significantly influenced the fatty acid profile and the physical parameters of seeds and seed oils. The highest linoleic acid ratio was found in the seed oil from A1 and A2, the oil from A3 had the highest oleic acid ratio. The results showed that the content and acid value in seed oils were improved, and that total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of both seed and oil were decreased by grafting. Wild rootstocks can be used in watermelon cultivation to obtain a watermelon seed which is rich in linoleic acid. </p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>Resumen</title>
				<p> El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar los efectos del injerto en el perfil de &#xe1;cidos grasos y algunas propiedades fisicoqu&#xed;micas de la semilla y el aceite de semillas de sand&#xed;a. El cultivar &#x2018;Crimson Tide&#x2019; se utiliz&#xf3; como v&#xe1;stago, mientras que dos sand&#xed;as silvestres (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>Citroides</italic> (A1 y A2)), una <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> (A3) y una <italic>Cucurbita maxima</italic> Duchesne x <italic>Cucurbita moschata</italic> Duchesne (A4) se utilizaron como portainjertos. El uso de portainjertos influy&#xf3; significativamente en el perfil de &#xe1;cidos grasos y los par&#xe1;metros f&#xed;sicos de semillas y aceites de semillas. La proporci&#xf3;n de &#xe1;cido linoleico m&#xe1;s alta se encontr&#xf3; en el aceite de semillas de A1 y A2, el aceite de A3 tuvo la proporci&#xf3;n de &#xe1;cido oleico m&#xe1;s alta. Los resultados mostraron que el contenido de aceite y el &#xed;ndice de acidez mejor&#xf3; y los compuestos fen&#xf3;licos totales y la actividad antioxidante tanto de la semilla como del aceite se redujeron mediante el injerto. Para obtener un aceite de semillas de sand&#xed;a rico en &#xe1;cido linoleico, se pueden utilizar portainjertos silvestres en el cultivo de sand&#xed;a.</p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>Citron watermelon</kwd>
				<kwd>Grafting</kwd>
				<kwd>PCA</kwd>
				<kwd>Rootstock</kwd>
				<kwd>Watermelon seed</kwd>
				<kwd>Watermelon seed oil</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<kwd>Aceite de semilla de sand&#xed;a</kwd>
				<kwd>Injerto</kwd>
				<kwd>PCA</kwd>
				<kwd>Portainjerto</kwd>
				<kwd>Sand&#xed;a cidra</kwd>
				<kwd>Semilla de sand&#xed;a</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<funding-group id="fw-01">
				<award-group id="aw1">
					<funding-source>Selcuk University</funding-source>
					<award-id>18401007</award-id>
				</award-group>
				<funding-statement> This research was funded by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office of Selcuk University, Turkey (Project Number 18401007).</funding-statement>
			</funding-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="2"/>
				<table-count count="7"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="35"/>
				<page-count count="11"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
			<label>1.</label>
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p> The watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>), which belongs to the family Cucurbitaceae, is one of the most nutritionally and economically important horticultural crops worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Acar <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kombo and Sari, 2019</xref>). According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a total of 100,414,933 tons per year of watermelon was produced in the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">FAOSTAT, 2020</xref>). China (60.4%) is the leading producer of watermelon, followed by Turkey (3.9%) and India (2.5%). Most of the fruit&#x2019;s seeds are usually discarded, and some are considered by-products. The seeds, which constitute 1-4% of the total watermelon weight, are highly nutritious and are rich in protein, vitamin B, minerals and oil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Braide <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duduyemi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kiin-Kabari and Akusu, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Seidu and Otutu, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Tabiri <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). Watermelon seed oil, whose content value is generally between 19-35% is used as edible oil in the food industry and as an ingredient in the cosmetic industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jensen <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Tabiri <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Rezig <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) are dominant in the fatty acid profile of watermelon seed oil. The saturated (mainly palmitic (16:0) and stearic (18:0) acids), monounsaturated (mainly oleic acid (18:1(&#x3c9;-9)) and polyunsaturated (mainly linoleic acid (18:2(&#x3c9;-6)) fatty acid contents in the seed oil are generally 17.90, 16.31 and 65.79%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">de Conto <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Eke <italic>et al</italic>., 2021</xref>).</p>
			<p> The quality of an oil obtained from a vegetable or seed is highly related to its unsaturated fatty acid profile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Nayeri and Yarizade, 2014</xref>). The proportions of oleic and linoleic acids in edible oils are generally indicative of their oxidative stability and nutritional properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Nayeri and Yarizade, 2014</xref>). Polyunsaturated fatty acids are the most beneficial for the preservation of human health and for controlling diseases such as cancer, inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disorders, and coronary heart diseases. In fact, the higher the degree of unsaturation in &#x3c9;-3, 6, 9 fatty acids, the more positive are the effects on human health. Another important aspect of linoleic acid is that it is essential and must be consumed because it cannot be synthesized in the human body (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Asif, 2015</xref>). Grafting plants on coherent rootstocks ensures some advantages like augmenting plant vigor, prolonging harvesting period and post-harvest life, providing water efficiency and tolerance to drought and salt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yetisir <italic>et al</italic>., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Davis <italic>et al</italic>., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lee <italic>et al</italic>., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Yetisir and Uygur, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kumar <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Solmaz <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). Several studies stated that grafting alters the content and quality of fruit. That being said, for successful grafting, choosing suitable rootstock is important (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Davis <italic>et al</italic>., 2008a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis <italic>et al</italic>., 2008b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Turhan <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>). Grafting is commonly used in watermelon cultivation. <italic>Cucurbita maxima &#xd7; Cucurbita moschata</italic> hybrids and <italic>Lageneria siceraria</italic> are the most common commercial rootstocks. On the other hand, wild watermelons (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic>) are important gene sources and are used in rootstock and breeding studies.</p>
			<p> Although many research studies regarding the effects of grafting on watermelon seed content are available, there has been no report on the analysis in terms of fatty acid profile and some physicochemical properties (except thousand grain weight) of seeds and seed oils from grafted watermelons in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of grafting on the seed and the seed oil of the Crimson Tide variety, which was grafted on <italic>Cucurbita maxima &#xd7; Cucurbita moschata, Lageneria siceraria</italic> and two wild watermelon rootstocks. In this context, the effects of grafting, namely total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and reflectance color values (<italic>L*, a*, b*,</italic> C* and h) of the watermelon seeds and seed oils were evaluated. Also, thousand grain weight and width-length-thickness dimensions of the seeds, and seed oil content, kernel oil content, fatty acid profile, and acid value of the seed oils were investigated.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
			<label>2.</label>
			<title>Materials and methods</title>
			<sec id="sec2.1">
				<label>2.1.</label>
				<title>Plant material and planting</title>
				<p> The research was carried out in Sel&#xe7;uk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Sar&#x131;calar Research and Application Farm, in 2017. The trial zone is located between 38&#x2da; 05&#x2019; northern latitudes and 32&#x2da; 36&#x2019; east longitudes and its average height from the sea is 1006 m. In the study, two wild rootstocks <italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic> (A1 and A2), one open-pollinated <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> (A3) and one <italic>Cucurbita maxima</italic> Duchesne x <italic>Cucurbita moschata</italic> Duchesne hybrid (&#x2018;TZ-148&#x2019;) (A4) were used as rootstocks. &#x2018;Crimson Tide&#x2019; (CT), a commercial watermelon variety widely grown in Turkey, was grafted on these four rootstocks and production materials were obtained. Ungrafted CT (K) was used as control. A total of 5 trial subjects were used in three replications according to the randomized block design. All cultural practices up to the harvest were applied to all applications equally. Watermelon fruits were harvested on time and after harvest, watermelon seeds from each application were hand collected seperately, washed to remove the fruit pulp residue and dried in an environment free from sunlight at room temperature for a week. The seeds were kept in freezer bags at 4 &#xba;C until oil extraction and analyses.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.2">
				<label>2.2.</label>
				<title>Determination of thousand grain weight and seed size</title>
				<p> Seeds (50 samples) were counted and weighed, and the weight was multiplied by 20 to obtain a thousand grain weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pradhan, 2010</xref>). The width, length and thickness of the seed grains were determined in mm using a caliper.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.3">
				<label>2.3.</label>
				<title>Determination of oil content in seeds and kernels</title>
				<p> According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">AOCS (1980)</xref> with some modifications, approximately 2 g of the milled seeds and kernels (shelled seeds) were extracted using 250 ml of petroleum ether in the Soxhlet device for 4 hours. The solvent was removed from the miscella by a rotary vacuum evaporator (RE100-Pro, Scilogex, CT, USA) set at 40 &#xba;C, and the oil contents of the samples were calculated. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.4">
				<label>2.4.</label>
				<title>Determination of acid numbers in seed oils</title>
				<p> The acid number analysis was determined by making some modifications according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">TSI (2003)</xref>. Firstly, 25 ml of ethyl alcohol-diethyl ether mixture (1:1) were added to 2 g oil sample. The mixture was titrated with a 0.1 N ethanolic NaOH solution with 1 ml phenolphthalein indicator. Results were given as mg NaOH/g oil.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.5">
				<label>2.5.</label>
				<title>Determination of fatty acid profile of seed oils</title>
				<p> The fatty acid methyl esters of seed oils were prepared according to the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Williams (1984)</xref> with some modifications. The sample was shaken vigorously in isooctane (0.4 g in 4 ml) and combined with 0.2 ml of 2 N methanolic potassium hydroxide. After the duration in the dark for 6 min, a drop of methyl orange and 0.45 ml of 1 N HCl were added, mixed and centrifuged (2000 rpm/5 min). The supernatants were then analyzed by a GC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) equipped with an injector, a capillary column (Innowax, 100 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.20 &#xb5;m of thickness), and a flame ionization detector (FID). Hydrogen was used as carrier gas. The temperature of the detector and injector was set as 250 <sup>o</sup>C. The initial oven temperature was 180 <sup>o</sup>C and increased to 220 <sup>o</sup>C at 30 <sup>o</sup>C/min.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.6">
				<label>2.6.</label>
				<title>Determination of reflectance color values of seeds and seed oils</title>
				<p> Color measurements of the seeds and their oils were determined as <italic>L*</italic> (lightness-darkness), <italic>a*</italic> (redness-greenness), <italic>b*</italic> (yellowness-blueness), C* (chroma) and h (hue) values in the CIE color system profile using Minolta colorimeter (CM-5, Minolta, Japan).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.7">
				<label>2.7.</label>
				<title>Extraction of polyphenols and antioxidant effective compounds from seeds and seed oils</title>
				<p> To extract the polyphenols and antioxidant effective compounds from seeds, 0.1 g of defatted ground seed obtained at the end of the oil extraction was weighed and 40 ml of 80% methanol solution were added. Homogenization was obtained by an ultra-turrax operation for 2 minutes at 200 rpm. Similarly, 1 g of oil sample was mixed with 2 ml methanol for 10 minutes in a shaker. The supernatants of oil-methanol and seed-methanol obtained from the centrifugation at 4100 rpm for 10 minutes was used for total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity analyses.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.8">
				<label>2.8.</label>
				<title>Determination of total phenolic compounds</title>
				<p> The total phenolic compounds (TPC) of oils and seeds were obtained using the Folin-Ciocalteu method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Singleton and Rossi, 1965</xref>), with slight modifications. The Folin-Ciocalteu reagent of 1.25 ml (0.2 N) and 1 ml of sodium carbonate (75 g/l) solution were added to 250 &#xb5;l of extract. Before determining the absorbance values of samples by spectrophotometer at 765 nm, they were kept in the dark for 2 hours. Results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) /kg.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.9">
				<label>2.9.</label>
				<title>Determination of antioxidant activity</title>
				<p> The antioxidant activity of watermelon seeds and their oils was determined using the 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydracyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method, according to an adapted colorimetric procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Akbulut <italic>et al</italic>., 2009</xref>). After adding 1.95 ml of DPPH reagent to 50 &#xb5;l extract, the mixture was kept in the dark for 30 minutes. The absorbance values of the samples were measured by spectrophotometer at 515 nm and antioxidant activity values were calculated in mmol Trolox Equivalent (TE)/kg.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.10">
				<label>2.10.</label>
				<title>Statistical analysis</title>
				<p> Significant differences among samples were determined through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test using SPSS package program version 22.0. Differences were considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01. The JMP 13.0 software was used to analyze the important parameters by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The relation between rootstocks was compared by drawing a loading plot graph using the same software and the relationship between each parameter and another was presented on the score plot graph.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec3" sec-type="results|discussion">
			<label>3.</label>
			<title>Results and discussion</title>
			<sec id="sec3.1">
				<label>3.1.</label>
				<title>Effect of grafting on watermelon seeds</title>
				<p> Some physicochemical properties of the seeds obtained from watermelon fruits are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Tables 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">2</xref>. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>, the rootstock had statistically significant effects on thousand grain weight, width-length-thickness dimensions, total phenolic compounds (TPC) and antioxidant activity (AA) values for the seeds. Thousand grain weight results of seeds ranged from 40.70 g to 48.70 g, and watermelons grafted on the bottle gourd rootstock (A3) with the highest thousand grain weight were statistically separated from other samples according to Duncan test results. While the thousand grain weight of the seeds of watermelons grafted on Citroides 1 (A1), Citroides 2 (A2) and TZ148 (A4) rootstocks was significantly decreased, that of watermelon seeds grafted on the bottle gourd (A3) was significantly increased (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). Similar to the results of this study, the grafting of Crimson Sweet (CS) watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>) steel on three different rootstocks (<italic>Cucurbita maxima</italic> x <italic>Cucurbita moschata</italic> &#x2018;NUN-9075&#x2019;, <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> &#x2018;Argentario&#x2019;, and citron watermelon <italic>Citrullus amarus</italic> Schard &#x2018;PI296341&#x2019;) had a significant effect on the thousand grain weight of the seeds obtained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kombo and Sari, 2019</xref>).</p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>The thousand grain weight, dimensions, total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity values of the watermelon seeds </title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left"> Rootstocks</th>
								<th align="center">Thousand grain weight (g)</th>
								<th align="center">Width (mm)</th>
								<th align="center">Length (mm)</th>
								<th align="center">Thickness (mm)</th>
								<th align="center">Total phenolic compounds (mg GAE/kg)</th>
								<th align="center">Antioxidant activity (mmol TE/kg)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">K</td>
								<td align="center">44.00&#xb1;0.20<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.36&#xb1;0.10<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">8.87&#xb1;0.17<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1.95&#xb1;0.03<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">2340.87&#xb1;17.39<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">6.80&#xb1;0.53<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A1</td>
								<td align="center">40.70&#xb1;0.30<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.07&#xb1;0.10<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">8.55&#xb1;0.19<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1.70&#xb1;0.11<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1366.96&#xb1;121.74<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.22&#xb1;0.53<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A2</td>
								<td align="center">41.50&#xb1;0.10<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.22&#xb1;0.13<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">8.63&#xb1;0.08<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1.72&#xb1;0.05<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1575.65&#xb1;86.96<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">6.54&#xb1;0.26<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A3</td>
								<td align="center">48.70&#xb1;0.10<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.77&#xb1;0.12<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">9.05&#xb1;0.14<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1.91&#xb1;0.04<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1140.87&#xb1;110.00<sup>e</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">3.57&#xb1;0.99<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A4</td>
								<td align="center">42.20&#xb1;0.80<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.04&#xb1;0.07<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">8.38&#xb1;0.11<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1.66&#xb1;0.08<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">1801.74&#xb1;139.13<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">4.16&#xb1;0.53<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p>The results are expressed as means &#xb1; standard deviation of 3 replicates (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) among rootstocks according to the one-way ANOVA/ Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Color values of watermelon seeds</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Rootstocks</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>L*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>a*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>b*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">C*</th>
								<th align="center">h</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">K</td>
								<td align="center">37.73&#xb1;1.07<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">5.25&#xb1;0.28<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">12.92&#xb1;1.11<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">67.77&#xb1;1.00</td>
								<td align="center">13.92&#xb1;1.15<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A1</td>
								<td align="center">31.42&#xb1;2.46<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">3.39&#xb1;0.56<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.65&#xb1;1.74<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">65.90&#xb1;1.93</td>
								<td align="center">8.37&#xb1;1.81<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A2</td>
								<td align="center">31.56&#xb1;1.32<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">3.17&#xb1;0.51<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.38&#xb1;1.33<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">66.72&#xb1;0.95</td>
								<td align="center">8.04&#xb1;1.42<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A3</td>
								<td align="center">29.77&#xb1;1.52<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">3.69&#xb1;0.13<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.45&#xb1;0.87<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">63.49&#xb1;2.15</td>
								<td align="center">8.31&#xb1;0.82<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A4</td>
								<td align="center">33.65&#xb1;1.89<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">3.93&#xb1;0.55<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">8.46&#xb1;1.41<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">64.99&#xb1;0.68</td>
								<td align="center">9.33&#xb1;1.51<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p>The results are expressed as means &#xb1; standard deviation of 3 replicates (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) among rootstocks according to the one-way ANOVA/ Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
				<p> As seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>, the width, length and thickness of the watermelon seeds varied from 5.0-5.8 mm, 8.4-9.0 mm and 1.7-1.9 mm, respectively. A decrease in the total amount of phenolic compounds of all watermelon seeds due to grafting was observed. It was determined that the seeds with the highest TPC belonged to the control sample (2340.9 mg GAE/kg) and the lowest to the A3 sample (1140.9 mg GAE/kg). In an analysis of the seeds of <italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Acar <italic>et al</italic>. (2012)</xref> found that the TPC of the seeds were 130 mg GAE/kg, and the reason for the decrease in the TPC of A1 and A2 samples may be due to the low content in the citroides species. Many recent studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Seidu and Otutu, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Tabiri <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>) have shown that watermelon seeds have much more TPC than those of this study. These differences in TPC may depend on factors such as variety and environmental conditions. The antioxidant activity values of watermelon seeds varied between 3.57 and 6.80 mmol TE/kg. As in the amount of phenolic compounds, a statistically significant decrease (except A2 sample) was observed in the antioxidant activity values of the seeds obtained as a result of grafting. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Tabiri <italic>et al</italic>. (2016)</xref> reported the antioxidant activity values of the seeds of &#x201c;Charleston gray&#x201d;, &#x201c;Black diamond&#x201d; and &#x201c;Crimson sweet&#x201d; watermelon varieties as 82.59, 96.63 and 130.29 mmol TE/kg, respectively.</p>
				<p> The decrease in color values of the watermelon seeds was found to be significant for <italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic> and h, but not for C* (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The <italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>, C* and h values varied between 29.77-37.73, 3.17-5.25, 7.38-12.92, 63.49-67.77 and 8.04-13.92, respectively. If we expanded the results for watermelon seeds, no significant difference was observed only in the C* values after grafting. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.2">
				<label>3.2.</label>
				<title>Effect of grafting on watermelon seed oil</title>
				<p> The seed oil content, kernel oil content, acid value, TPC and AA values of the samples are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> and the fatty acid profile in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>. It has been determined that the differences that occured in these values except for the kernel oil content and TPC results are statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). The increase observed in the oil efficiency of all the seeds by grafting was found statistically significant. Sample A2 (26.34%) had the highest seed oil content, followed by A1 (25.90%), A4 (25.46%), A3 (24.75%) and lastly K (24.05%). However, there was no similarity between seed oil content and kernel oil content in the samples. Kernel oil content values were listed in descending order as follows: A1, K, A4, A3, A2. The oil contents in the seeds and kernels of <italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic> were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Acar <italic>et al</italic>. (2012)</xref> as 26.83 and 52.34%, respectively. In addition, four <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> cultivars were studied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Essien <italic>et al</italic>. (2013)</xref> and the content in seed oils, which is close to our results, was obtained in the range of 23.0-29.5%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Tabiri <italic>et al</italic>. (2016)</xref> reported that the seed oil contents in &#x201c;Crimson sweet&#x201d;, &#x201c;Charleston gray&#x201d; and &#x201c;Black diamond&#x201d; varieties were 26.50, 26.83 and 27.85%, respectively. In one of the studies, the seed oil content values of the &#x201c;Crimson&#x201d; cultivar was 19.23% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">de Conto <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>), while in another, in the &#x201c;Mateera&#x201d; and &#x201c;Sugar baby&#x201d; varieties were 25.53% (46.85% kernel oil content) and 21.93% (38.88% kernel oil content), respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Wani <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). Considering all of this evidence, it seems that oil content values can vary based on the watermelon variety.</p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Oil content in seeds and some physicochemical, and phytochemical properties of watermelon seed oils </title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Rootstocks</th>
								<th align="center">Oil content (%)</th>
								<th align="center">Kernel oil content (%)</th>
								<th align="center">Acid value (mg NaOH/g)</th>
								<th align="center">Total phenolic compound (mg GAE/kg)</th>
								<th align="center">Antioxidant activity (mmol TE/kg)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">K</td>
								<td align="center">24.05&#xb1;0.19<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">45.61&#xb1;0.11</td>
								<td align="center">5.35&#xb1;0.20<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">51.86&#xb1;0.26</td>
								<td align="center">0.52&#xb1;0.03<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A1</td>
								<td align="center">25.90&#xb1;0.77<sup>ab</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">46.44&#xb1;0.34</td>
								<td align="center">4.33&#xb1;0.19<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">50.69&#xb1;0.65</td>
								<td align="center">0.45&#xb1;0.01<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A2</td>
								<td align="center">26.34&#xb1;0.38<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">44.19&#xb1;0.84</td>
								<td align="center">4.86&#xb1;0.06<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">53.56&#xb1;1.96</td>
								<td align="center">0.44&#xb1;0.01<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A3</td>
								<td align="center">24.75&#xb1;0.36<sup>cd</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">44.44&#xb1;1.52</td>
								<td align="center">4.76&#xb1;0.13<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">51.50&#xb1;0.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.46&#xb1;0.01<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A4</td>
								<td align="center">25.46&#xb1;0.35<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">45.19&#xb1;0.99</td>
								<td align="center">4.50&#xb1;0.15<sup>cd</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">49.25&#xb1;2.87</td>
								<td align="center">0.49&#xb1;0.01<sup>ab</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p>The results are expressed as means &#xb1; standard deviation of 3 replicates (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) among rootstocks according to the one-way ANOVA/ Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>The fatty acid profile (%) of watermelon seed oils</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Rootstocks</th>
								<th align="center">Palmitic 16:0</th>
								<th align="center">Stearic 18:0</th>
								<th align="center">Oleic 18:1</th>
								<th align="center">Linoleic 18:2</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">K</td>
								<td align="center">11.90&#xb1;0.00<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.97&#xb1;0.00<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">16.74&#xb1;0.41<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">63.40&#xb1;0.40<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A1</td>
								<td align="center">11.63&#xb1;0.11<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.59&#xb1;0.11<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">15.98&#xb1;0.11<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">64.81&#xb1;0.33<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A2</td>
								<td align="center">12.27&#xb1;0.00<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.27&#xb1;0.15<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">15.78&#xb1;0.02<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">64.68&#xb1;0.13<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A3</td>
								<td align="center">12.25&#xb1;0.08<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.95&#xb1;0.14<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">17.86&#xb1;0.16<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">61.88&#xb1;0.00<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A4</td>
								<td align="center">11.96&#xb1;0.11<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">7.40&#xb1;0.01<sup>bc</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">17.33&#xb1;0.07<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">63.32&#xb1;0.04<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>The results are expressed as means &#xb1; standard deviation of 3 replicates (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) among rootstocks according to the one-way ANOVA/ Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test. Standard deviation values below 0.01 were equal to &#xb1; 0.00</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
				<p> The acid values for the samples (4.33 to 5.35 mg NaOH/g) were relatively high compared to that reported for watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> L.) seeds (2.37 mg NaOH/g) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duduyemi <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). With the effect of grafting, there was a significant decrease in acid value as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). Among the grafted rootstocks, A2 (4.86 mg NaOH/g) had the highest acid value, while A1 (4.33 mg NaOH/g) had the lowest. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Essien <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) </xref>determined the acid values for the seed oils from four gourd cultivars as between 2.1-2.4 mg KOH/g. For this value, the decrease in A3 compared to the control sample may be due to the low acidity of the oil from the gourd seeds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Wani <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) </xref>obtained oil from &#x201c;Mateera&#x201d; and &#x201c;Sugar baby&#x201d; cultivars and reported that the acid values in mg KOH/g oil were 4.27 and 6.46, respectively. In another investigation, in which cold press was applied, the acid value of the &#x201c;Crimson&#x201d; variety seed oil was found to be 9.5 mg KOH/g oil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Rezig <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). The TPC of the seed oils from grafted (49.25-53.56 mg GAE/kg) and ungrafted (51.86 mg GAE/kg) watermelons was lower than that of Iranian watermelon seed oils (111 mg GAE/kg), as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hashemi <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>. In addition, the TPC of the seed oils from four gourd cultivars was found to be between 80 and 105 mg GAE/kg as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Essien <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref>. The decrease observed in the antioxidant activity of oils by grafting was found statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). The control sample (K) (0.52 mmol TE/kg) had the highest antioxidant activity, followed by the A4 (0.49 mmol TE/kg), A3 (0.46 mmol TE/kg), A1 (0.45 mmol TE/kg), A2 (0.44 mmol TE/kg) samples. </p>
				<p> The polyunsaturated, monounsaturated and saturated fatty acid profiles of the watermelon seed oils statistically changed with the application of grafting (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The fatty acid distribution in the ungrafted control sample (Crimson Tide) was as follows: 63.40% linoleic acid, 16.74% oleic acid, 11.90% palmitic acid and 7.97% stearic acid. When compared to the control sample, an increase in the amount of unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) in the A1, A2 and A4 samples and of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in the A3 was observed. The highest linoleic acid content was determined in the seed oils from the citroides rootstock samples as 64.81% (A1) and 64.68% (A2), the lowest oleic acid content was also determined in the same samples as 15.98% and 15.78%, respectively. According to the control sample, the grafting application in citroides samples caused a statistically significant increase in linoleic acid content, with a significant decrease in the oleic acid content. The seed oil from the bottle gourd rootstock sample (A3) had the highest oleic acid content (17.86%), but the lowest linoleic acid (61.88%). No work regarding the effect of grafting on the fatty acid profile of the seed oils from watermelons or the other plants in the Cucurbitaceae family could be found. This situation is also valid for all analyses performed on the seeds and their oils except thousand grain weight. The obtained results for the fatty acid profiles show similarity with the studies performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Wani <italic>et al</italic>. (2013)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hashemi <italic>et al</italic>. (2017)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Rezig <italic>et al</italic>. (2019)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Eke <italic>et al</italic>. (2021)</xref>. With the effect of grafting, a significant difference was observed in the color values of watermelon seed oils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). The increase in <italic>L*</italic> and h values and the decrease in <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic> and C* values were statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). The values for <italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>, C* and h in the oils were between 87.09-89.08, (-)0.47- (-)1.21, 62.11-80.37, 62.12-80.37 and 90.34-91.12, respectively.</p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Color values of watermelon seed oils</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Rootstocks</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>L*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>a*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">
									<italic>b*</italic>
								</th>
								<th align="center">C*</th>
								<th align="center">h</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">K</td>
								<td align="center">87.09&#xb1;0.01<sup>e</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">-0.47&#xb1;0.00<sup>e</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">80.37&#xb1;0.01<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">80.37&#xb1;0.01<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">90.34&#xb1;0.00<sup>e</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A1</td>
								<td align="center">88.08&#xb1;0.01<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">-0.60&#xb1;0.02<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">74.63&#xb1;0.03<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">74.64&#xb1;0.04<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">90.46&#xb1;0.01<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A2</td>
								<td align="center">88.30&#xb1;0.03<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">-0.75&#xb1;0.01<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">77.43&#xb1;0.01<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">77.43&#xb1;0.01<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">90.56&#xb1;0.01<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A3</td>
								<td align="center">88.60&#xb1;0.03<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">-1.08&#xb1;0.02<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">74.60&#xb1;0.00<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">74.61&#xb1;0.00<sup>c</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">90.83&#xb1;0.01<sup>b</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">A4</td>
								<td align="center">89.08&#xb1;0.04<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">-1.21&#xb1;0.01<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">62.11&#xb1;0.03<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">62.12&#xb1;0.02<sup>d</sup>
								</td>
								<td align="center">91.12&#xb1;0.01<sup>a</sup>
								</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>The results are expressed as means &#xb1; standard deviation of 3 replicates (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) among rootstocks according to the one-way ANOVA/ Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test. Standard deviation values below 0.01 were equal to &#xb1; 0.00</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.3">
				<label>3.3.</label>
				<title>Principal component analysis (PCA)</title>
				<sec id="sec3.3.1">
					<label>3.3.1.</label>
					<title>PCA of seeds</title>
					<p> PCA is a practical and commonly used method to estimate the agricultural practices on product content and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Seymen <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). The seeds of the watermelon grafted with different rootstocks, thousand grain weight, width, length, thickness, color values (<italic>L*, a*, b*,</italic> C*, h), total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity results obtained were subjected to PCA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). As a result of PCA, the study explained a high rate of 91.4% in two components. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Seymen <italic>et al</italic>. (2019)</xref> reported that the first two components should be explained by more than 25% of the study to use PCA. According to the results obtained, 91.4% of two components studied were detected and it was revealed that this analysis will give important results about the usability and the parameters examined. The first component (PC1) explained 53.7% of the study and <italic>L*, a*, b*,</italic> C*, h and total phenolic compound parameters were the highest declared parameters positively. The second component (PC2) explained 37.7% of the study and thousand grain weight, width, length, and thickness parameters were the highest explained parameters. </p>
					<table-wrap id="t6">
						<label>Table 6</label>
						<caption>
							<title>PCA results regarding some seed characteristics of scion nn different rootstocks</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Items</th>
									<th align="center">PC1</th>
									<th align="center">PC2</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Eigenvalue</td>
									<td align="center">5.91</td>
									<td align="center">4.15</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Percentage of variance</td>
									<td align="center">53.7</td>
									<td align="center">37.7</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Cumulative variance</td>
									<td align="center">53.7</td>
									<td align="center">91.4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Eigenvectors</td>
									<td align="left"> </td>
									<td align="left"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Thousand grain weight</td>
									<td align="center">-0.01574</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.48529</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Width </td>
									<td align="center">0.00410</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.47570</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Length </td>
									<td align="center">0.13154</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.43907</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Thickness</td>
									<td align="center">0.19524</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.43071</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>L*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.39446</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">-0.09372</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>a*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.38036</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.12672</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>b*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.40644</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.04465</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">C*</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.30853</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">-0.25675</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">h</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.40444</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.05557</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Total phenolic compounds</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.38396</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">-0.13156</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Antioxidant activity</td>
									<td align="center">0.26956</td>
									<td align="center">-0.21624</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN6">
								<p>PC1 and PC2 indicate first and second components, respectively.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
					<p> A loading chart was created to examine the relationships among thousand grain weight, width, length, thickness color (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>, C*, h), total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1-A </xref>). If the angle between the vectors in the figure is &lt; 90<sup>o</sup>, there is a positive relationship; if it is &gt; 90<sup>o</sup>, there is a negative relationship; and if it is equal to 90<sup>o</sup>, there is no relationship. As seen in the figure, the highest positive relationships were seen among antioxidant activity-C*, h-<italic>b*</italic> and thousand grain weight-width. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Seymen <italic>et al</italic>. (2019)</xref> reported positive relationships between thousand grain weight-seed width and thousand grain weight-length in pumpkin seeds. On the other hand, the dimensions of seeds and thousand grain weight parameters showed no relationship with seed color or other chemical contents. In the score plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2-A </xref>), control (K) was in the positive region of both components, which showed significant results for the parameters in both components. As a result, the control had significant effects on some physicochemical properties of watermelon seeds. On the other hand, wild rootstocks (A1 and A2) and A4 showed similarity in terms of seed characteristics and were located in the same region on the plot.</p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figure 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Loading plot based on PC1 and PC2 obtained by principal component analysis using some seed (A) and oil (B) characteristics of scion on different rootstocks</title>
						<p>*PC1: First component; PC2: Second component; OY (Oil yield); KOY (Kernel oil yield); TPC (Total phenolic compounds); AA (Antioxidant activity); <italic>L*</italic> (Lightness); <italic>a*</italic> (redness-greeness); <italic>b*</italic> (yellowness-blueness); C* (Chroma); h (Hue); AV (Acid Value); LA (Linoleic Acid); PA (Palmitic Acid); SA (Stearic Acid); OA (Oleic Acid); TSW (thousand grain weight); SW (width); SL (length); ST (thickness)</p>
						</caption>
						<graphic id="gra-1" xlink:href="GYA-73-03-e475-gf1.png"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
				<sec id="sec3.3.2">
					<label>3.3.2.</label>
					<title>PCA of seed oil</title>
					<p> The seed oil from the watermelon grafted with different rootstocks, oil content, kernel oil content, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, color values (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>, C*, h), acid value, stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid results obtained were subjected to PCA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">Table 7</xref>). As a result of PCA, the study explained a high rate of 94.07% in three components. </p>
					<table-wrap id="t7">
						<label>Table 7</label>
						<caption>
							<title>PCA results regarding some oil characteristics of scion in different rootstocks</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Items</th>
									<th align="center">PC1</th>
									<th align="center">PC2</th>
									<th align="center">PC3</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Eigenvalue</td>
									<td align="center">6.11</td>
									<td align="center">4.04</td>
									<td align="center">3.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Percentage of variance</td>
									<td align="center">43.7</td>
									<td align="center">28.9</td>
									<td align="center">21.5</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Cumulative variance</td>
									<td align="center">43.7</td>
									<td align="center">72.5</td>
									<td align="center">94.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Eigenvectors</td>
									<td align="left"> </td>
									<td align="left"> </td>
									<td align="left"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Oil content</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.12247</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>-0.46143</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.12545</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Kernel oil content</td>
									<td align="center">0.09545</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.08155</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>-0.54450</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Total phenolic compounds</td>
									<td align="center">0.26307</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.09902</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.42191</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Antioxidant activity</td>
									<td align="center">0.07336</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.34514</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.26465</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>L*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>-0.38725</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.08516</td>
									<td align="center">0.11911</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>a*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.38234</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.11057</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.13621</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">
										<italic>b*</italic>
									</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.37950</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.01483</td>
									<td align="center">0.16105</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">C*</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.37947</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.01485</td>
									<td align="center">0.16096</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">h</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>-0.39349</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.09420</td>
									<td align="center">0.05256</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Acid Value</td>
									<td align="center">0.26798</td>
									<td align="center">0.27154</td>
									<td align="center">0.16867</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Palmitic acid</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.07043</td>
									<td align="center">0.11719</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.54856</bold>
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Stearic acid</td>
									<td align="center">0.16425</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.39950</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.09502</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Oleic acid</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.20623</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>0.41906</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center">0.01803</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Linoleic acid</td>
									<td align="center">0.12656</td>
									<td align="center">
										<bold>-0.44726</bold>
									</td>
									<td align="center"> -0.11687</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN7">
								<p>PC1, PC2, and PC3 indicate first, second, and third components, respectively.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
					<p> According to the results obtained, 94.1% of three components studies were detected and it was revealed that this analysis will give important results about the usability and the parameters examined. The first component (PC1) and the second component (PC2) explained 43.7 and 28.9% of the study, respectively. <italic>a*, b*,</italic> and C* parameters in PC1 were the highest declared parameters positively while <italic>L*</italic> and h parameters were the highest declared negatively. In PC2 antioxidant activity, oleic acid and stearic acid were the highest parameters declared positively; oil content, and linoleic acid were the highest parameters declared negatively. The third component (PC3) explained 21.5% of the study and total phenolic compounds and palmitic acid parameters were the highest positive parameters and kernel oil content was the highest negative parameter. </p>
					<p> A loading chart was created to examine the relationships among oil content, kernel oil content, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, color (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>, C*, h), acid value, stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1-B </xref>). The highest positive relationships were found between <italic>a*</italic>- total phenolic compounds, <italic>b*</italic>- C*. The highest negative relationships were found between linoleic acid-oleic acid, oil content-antioxidant activity. Similar to the result of this research, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gangadhara and Nadaf (2018)</xref> reported strong negative relationships between oleic acid and linoleic acid in two backcross generations of groundnut. Delta-12 fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) enzyme, which is specific to plant seeds, converts oleic acid to linoleic acid by desaturation and leads to high linoleic acid contents in some seed oils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Nayeri and Yarizade, 2014</xref>). The negative relationship between oleic and linoleic acids in this study may be explained by conversions among fatty acids. Higher linoleic acid ratios in the oils of A1 and A2 samples can arise from the activities of such enzymes. In the score plot, control (K) was in the positive region of both components (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2-B </xref>). As a result, the control had significant effects on the some physicochemical properties of watermelon seed oil. However, A1 and A2 wild rootstocks differed from other rootstocks and the control sample with its high linoleic acid content. When taking into consideration the importance of linoleic acid for human health and linoleic acid ratios of A1 and A2 samples, wild watermelon rootstocks can be an alternative to commercial rootstocks in watermelon grafting in terms of seed oil production.</p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Score plot based on PC1 and PC2 obtained from principal component analysis using some seed (A) and oil (B) characteristics of scion on different rootstocks</title>
						<p>*PC1: First component; PC2: Second component; K (Control); A1 and A2 (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> var. <italic>citroides</italic>. A3 (<italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic>); A4 (<italic>Cucurbita maxima</italic> Duchesne x <italic>Cucurbita moschata</italic> Duchesne hybrid (&#x2018;TZ-148&#x2019;))</p>
						</caption>
						<graphic id="gra-2" xlink:href="GYA-73-03-e475-gf2.png"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec4" sec-type="conclusions">
			<label>4.</label>
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p> The present study demonstrated that the application of grafting to watermelon significantly influenced the fatty acid profile and physicochemical properties of seeds and seed oils apart from C* values for the seeds, kernel oil content and total phenolic compounds of seed oils. Although the use of rootstocks decreased the total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the seeds, it increased the oil efficiency of the seeds and improved the use of them for seed oil. In addition, the use of citroides rootstocks can be recommended in terms of high content in linoleic acid. This study is the first to investigate the detailed characteristics of grafted watermelon seeds. Therefore, more studies are needed on this subject.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p> This research was funded by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office of Selcuk University, Turkey (Project Number 18401007).</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Acar</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ozcan</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kanbur</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dursun</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Some physico-chemical properties of edible and forage watermelon seeds</article-title>
					<source>Iran J. Chem. Eng.</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>41</fpage>
					<lpage>47</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30492/IJCCE.2012.5919</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Akbulut</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ozcan</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Coklar</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of antioxidant activity, phenolic, mineral contents and some physicochemical properties of several pine honeys collected from western Anatolia</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr.</source>
					<volume>60</volume>
					<fpage>577</fpage>
					<lpage>589</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/09637480801892486</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOCS</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1980</year>
					<source>Official Methods and Recommended Practices of The American Oil Chemist&#x2019;s Society</source>
					<edition>4</edition>
					<publisher-loc>Champaign</publisher-loc>
					<publisher-name>Illinois</publisher-name>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Asif</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Chemical characteristics and nutritional potentials of unsaturated fatty acids</article-title>
					<source>Chem. Int.</source>
					<volume>1</volume>
					<fpage>118</fpage>
					<lpage>133</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Braide</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Odiong</surname>
							<given-names>IJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Oranusi</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Phytochemical and antibacterial properties of the seed of watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>)</article-title>
					<source>P. J. Microbiol. Res.</source>
					<volume>2</volume>
					<fpage>99</fpage>
					<lpage>104</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Davis</surname>
							<given-names>AR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Perkins-Veazie</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sakata</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Galarza</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Maroto</surname>
							<given-names>JV</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>SG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huh</surname>
							<given-names>YC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Miguel</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>King</surname>
							<given-names>SR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cohen</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Cucurbit grafting</article-title>
					<source>Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<fpage>50</fpage>
					<lpage>74</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07352680802053940</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Davis</surname>
							<given-names>AR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Perkins-Veazie</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hassell</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Levi</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>King</surname>
							<given-names>SR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Grafting effects on vegetable quality</article-title>
					<source>Hortscience</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<fpage>1670</fpage>
					<lpage>1672</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1670</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>de Conto</surname>
							<given-names>LC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gragnani</surname>
							<given-names>MAL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Maus</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ambiel</surname>
							<given-names>HCI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chiu</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Grimaldi</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gon&#xe7;alves</surname>
							<given-names>LAG</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of crude watermelon seed oil by two different extractions methods</article-title>
					<source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>1709</fpage>
					<lpage>1714</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-011-1850-8</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Duduyemi</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Adebanjo</surname>
							<given-names>SA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kehinde</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Extraction and determination of physico-chemical properties of watermelon seed oil (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> L.) for relevant uses</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Sci. Res.</source>
					<volume>2</volume>
					<fpage>66</fpage>
					<lpage>68</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Eke</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ejiofor</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Oyedemi</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Onoja</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Omeh</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of nutritional composition of <italic>Citrullus lanatus Linn.</italic> (watermelon) seed and biochemical assessment of the seed oil in rats</article-title>
					<source>J. Food Biochem.</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<elocation-id>e13763</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfbc.13763</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Essien</surname>
							<given-names>EE</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Udo</surname>
							<given-names>II</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Umoh</surname>
							<given-names>SD</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acids composition and seed oils quality of <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> cultivars grown Northern Nigeria</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Nat. Prod. Sci.</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Essien</surname>
							<given-names>EE</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Antia</surname>
							<given-names>BS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Peter</surname>
							<given-names>NS</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>
						<italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> (Molina) standley. Total polyphenols and antioxidant activity of seed oils of bottle gourd cultivars</article-title>
					<source>World J. Pharm. Res.</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<fpage>274</fpage>
					<lpage>285</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>FAOSTAT</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<source>FAO Statistical Database</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org">http://www.fao.org</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gangadhara</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nadaf</surname>
							<given-names>HL</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Genetic analysis of oleic acid and linoleic acid content in relation to oil quality in groundnut</article-title>
					<source>Electron J. Plant Breed</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>283</fpage>
					<lpage>294</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00033.9</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hashemi</surname>
							<given-names>SMB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Khaneghah</surname>
							<given-names>AM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Koubaa</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lopez-Cervantes</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yousefabad</surname>
							<given-names>SHA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hosseini</surname>
							<given-names>SF</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karimia</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Motazediana</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Asadifard</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Novel edible oil sources: microwave heating and chemical properties</article-title>
					<source>Food Res. Int.</source>
					<volume>92</volume>
					<fpage>147</fpage>
					<lpage>153</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2016.11.033</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jensen</surname>
							<given-names>BD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamattal</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tour&#xe9;</surname>
							<given-names>AT</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nantoum&#xe9;</surname>
							<given-names>AD</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Watermelons in the Sand of Sahara: cultivation and use of indigenous landraces in the Tombouctou Region of Mali</article-title>
					<source>Ethnobot. Res. Appl.</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>151</fpage>
					<lpage>162</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17348/era.9.0.151-162</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kiin-Kabari</surname>
							<given-names>DB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Akusu</surname>
							<given-names>OM</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Effect of processing on the proximate composition, functional properties and storage stability of watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>) seed flour</article-title>
					<source>J. Int. J. Biotechnol. Food Sci.</source>
					<volume>2</volume>
					<fpage>143</fpage>
					<lpage>148</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kombo</surname>
							<given-names>MD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sari</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Rootstock effects on seed yield and quality in watermelon</article-title>
					<source>Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.</source>
					<volume>60</volume>
					<fpage>303</fpage>
					<lpage>312</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-019-00131-x</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rouphael</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cardarelli</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Colla</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency</article-title>
					<source>Front. Plant Sci.</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<elocation-id>1130</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01130</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kubota</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tsao</surname>
							<given-names>SJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bie</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Echevarria</surname>
							<given-names>PH</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Morra</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Oda</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation</article-title>
					<source>Sci. Hortic.</source>
					<volume>127</volume>
					<fpage>93</fpage>
					<lpage>105</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nayeri</surname>
							<given-names>FD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yarizade</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Bioinformatics study of delta-12 fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) gene in oilseeds</article-title>
					<source>Mol. Biol. Rep.</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>5077</fpage>
					<lpage>5087</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11033-014-3373-5</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pradhan</surname>
							<given-names>RC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Meda</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Naik</surname>
							<given-names>SN</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tabil</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Physical Properties of Canadian Grown Flaxseed in Relation to Its Processing</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Food Propert</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<issue>49</issue>
					<fpage>732</fpage>
					<lpage>743</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10942910902818137</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rezig</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chouaibi</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Meddeb</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Msaada</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hamdi</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of Cucurbitaceae Seeds: Potential sources for new trends of plant oils</article-title>
					<source>Process Saf. Environ. Prot.</source>
					<volume>127</volume>
					<fpage>73</fpage>
					<lpage>81</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.005</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seidu</surname>
							<given-names>KT</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Otutu</surname>
							<given-names>OL</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Phytochemical composition and radical scavenging activities of watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>) seed constituents</article-title>
					<source>Croat J. Food Sci. Technol.</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>83</fpage>
					<lpage>89</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17508/CJFST.2016.8.2.07</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seymen</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yavuz</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dursun</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kurtar</surname>
							<given-names>ES</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>T&#xfc;rkmen</surname>
							<given-names>&#xd6;</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Identification of drought-tolerant pumpkin (<italic>Cucurbita pepo l</italic>.) genotypes associated with certain fruit characteristics, seed yield, and quality</article-title>
					<source>Agric. Water Manag.</source>
					<volume>221</volume>
					<fpage>150</fpage>
					<lpage>159</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.009</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Singleton</surname>
							<given-names>VL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rossi</surname>
							<given-names>JAJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1965</year>
					<article-title>Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents</article-title>
					<source>Curr. Contents</source>
					<volume>16</volume>
					<fpage>144</fpage>
					<lpage>158</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Solmaz</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sari</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kombo</surname>
							<given-names>MD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>&#x15e;im&#x15f;ek</surname>
							<given-names>&#x130;</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hussein</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Namli</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Rootstock capacity in improving production and quality of triploid watermelon seeds</article-title>
					<source>Turk. J. Agric. For</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<fpage>298</fpage>
					<lpage>308</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/tar-1801-59</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tabiri</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Agbenorhevi</surname>
							<given-names>JK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wireko-Manu</surname>
							<given-names>FD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ompouma</surname>
							<given-names>FEI</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Watermelon seeds as food: nutrient composition, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity</article-title>
					<source>Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr.</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>139</fpage>
					<lpage>144</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160502.18</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="standard">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>TSI</collab>
					</person-group>
					<std>
						<year>2003</year>
						<std-organization>TS</std-organization>
						<pub-id>342</pub-id>
						<source>Methods of analysis for edible olive oils</source>
					</std>
					<publisher-name>Turkish Standards Institution</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Ankara</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Turhan</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ozmen</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kuscu</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Serbeci</surname>
							<given-names>MS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seniz</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Influence of rootstocks on yield and fruit characteristics and quality of watermelon</article-title>
					<source>Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.</source>
					<volume>53</volume>
					<fpage>336</fpage>
					<lpage>341</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-012-0034-2</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wani</surname>
							<given-names>AA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sogi</surname>
							<given-names>DS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Singh</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>G&#xf6;tz</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Impacts of refining and antioxidants on the physico-chemical characteristics and oxidative stability of watermelon seed oil</article-title>
					<source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source>
					<volume>90</volume>
					<fpage>1423</fpage>
					<lpage>1430</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-013-2277-1</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Williams</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis of the association official analytical chemists</source>
					<edition>14</edition>
					<publisher-name>Arlington VA</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yetisir</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sari</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yucel</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and effect on fruit yield and quality of watermelon</article-title>
					<source>Phytoparasitica</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>163</fpage>
					<lpage>169</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02980786</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yetisir</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Uygur</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Responses of grafted watermelon onto different gourd species to salinity stress</article-title>
					<source>J. Plant Nutr.</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>315</fpage>
					<lpage>327</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904160903470372</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huber</surname>
							<given-names>DJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Grafting effects on postharvest ripening and quality of 1-methylcyclopropene-treated muskmelon fruit</article-title>
					<source>Sci. Hortic.</source>
					<volume>130</volume>
					<fpage>581</fpage>
					<lpage>587</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2011.08.010</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>