Sulphur doses and application times on yield and oil quality of canola grown in calcareous soil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.1176182Keywords:
Canola, Linoleic acid, Oil, Oleic acid, Production, Protein, SulphurAbstract
Pakistan has been constantly deficient in its oil seed production and it is very difficult to meet the edible oil requirement of its ever-increasing population. A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Northern Pakistan during winter (2013–14). Five sulphur levels (15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 kg·ha-1) and times of application (at seedling, bolting and flowering stages) were used for the canola variety Abasin-95. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design replicated four times on a 5 m × 3.2 m plot size. The results showed that the sulphur-applied plots gave the highest seed yield, biological yield, glucosinolate, erucic acid, oil content, protein content, oleic acid and linoleic acid compared to the control plots. Sulphur applied at the rate of 60 kg·ha-1 and applied at the bolting stage increased seed yield, biological yield, oil content, and protein content.
Downloads
References
Ahmed A, Abdin MZ. 2000. Effect of sulphur application on lipid, RNA and fatty acid content in developing seeds of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.). Pl. Sci. 150, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00167-3
Ahmad G, Jan A, Arif M, Jan MT, Khattak RA. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 8, 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0731 PMid:17910116 PMCid:PMC1997227
Ahmad N, Muhammad A, Munir I, Shah Z, Basir A. 2015. Characterization of rapeseed germplasm for various quality parameters. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 15, 2466-2472.
Ahmad N, Saleem MT, Rashid M, Jalil A. 1994. Sulphur status and crop response in Pakistan soils. National Fertilizer Development Center. Pub. No. 7/94. Planning and Development Division, Islamabad. PP. 1-5.
Begum F, Hossain F, Mondal MRI. 2012. Influence of sulphur on morphophysiological and yield parameters of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 37, 645-652. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i4.14389
Begum F, Hossain F, Islam MM, Mondal MRI. 2015. Effect of sulphur on biochemical parameters of rapeseed (Brassica Campestris L.) in grey terrace soil. Archives Agro. Soil Sci. 62, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2015.1045496
Chauhan DR, Paroda S, Ram M. 1996. Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) to biofertilizers, S and N fertilization. Indian J. Agron. 41, 621-623.
GOP. 2014. Economic Survey Report. (2013-14). Govt. of Pak. Finance Division, Islamabad. P, 1-18.
Grombacher A, Nelson L, 1992. Canola Production. A University of Nebraska Neb Guide Publication, No. G92- 1076-A. Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Kandil H, Gad N. 2012. Growth and oil production of canola as affected by different sulphur sources. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res. 2, 5196-5202.
Hassan FU, Manaf A, Qadir G, Basra SMA, 2007. Effects of sulphur on seed yield, oil, protein and glucosinolates of canola cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 9, 504-508.
Hocking PJ, Pinkerton A, Good A, 1996. Recovery of field-grown canola from sulphur deficiency. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9960079
Holmes MRJ. 1980. Nitrogen; In Nutrition of the oilseed rape crop. Applied Sci Pub Barking Essex England. P.21-67.
Jan A, Ahmad G, Jan T, Jamal M, Subhan F. 2008. Oil yields of canola as affected by N and S levels and methods of application under rainfed conditions. Sarhad J. Agric. 24, 1-10.
Jan MT, Shah P, Hoolinton PA, Khan MJ, Sohail Q. 2009. Agriculture research: Design and Analysis: Deptt. of Agronomy, NWFP Agric. Uni. Peshawar, Pakistan.
Khandkar MR, Malviya PK, Nigam KB. 1991. Influence of N and S applications on mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in vertisol. Res. Devel. Rep. 8, 189-190.
Kumar R, Trivedi S.K. 2012. Effect of levels and sources of sulphur on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by mustard (Brassica juncea). Progressive Agriculture, Internat. J. 12, 69-73.
Mailer RJ. 1989. Effects of applied sulphur on glucosinolate and oil concentration in the seeds of rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica rapa L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 40, 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9890617
Malhi H, Leach D. 2000. Restore canola yields by correcting sulphur deficiency in the growing season. Proc. 12th annual meeting and conference "Sustainable farming in the new millennium". Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association, Regina, SK., Canada.
Malhi SS, Gill KS. 2002. Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82, 665-674. https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-184
Malik MA, Aziz I, Khan HZ, Wahid MA. 2004. Growth, seed yield and oil content response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to varying levels of sulphur. Internat. J. Agric. Biol. 6,1153-1155.
Marschner H. 1986. Functions macronutrients & micronutrients, Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press Inc. London, U.K. pp, 1- 674.
Varényiová M, Ducsay L, Ryant P. 2017. Sulphur nutrition and its effect on yield and oil content of oilseed rape (Brassica Napus L.). Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mende. Brun. 65, 555-562. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765020555
Manaf A, Fayyaz UH. 2006. Effects of sulphur on fatty acid accumulation in brassica cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8, 588-592.
MNFS&R. 2013-14. Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Agric. Statistics of Pakistan. Govt. of Pak, Economic Wing, Islamabad, pp, 1-166.
Muhammad S, Khalil IA, Khan S. 1991. Fatty acid composition of rape and mustard oilseed cultivars. Sci. Khyber. 4, 29-36.
Ray K, Sengupta K, Pal AK, Banerjee H. 2015. Effects of sulphur fertilization on yield, S uptake and quality of Indian mustard under varied irrigation regimes. Plant Soil Environ. 61, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.17221/860/2014-PSE
Rashid A. 1996. Secondry and micronutrients. In A. Rashid, Q. S. Memon, E. Bashir and R. Band (Eds.) Soil Science. National Book Foundation; Islamabad, p. 341-372.
R?kas A, Siger A, Wroniak M, ?cibisz I. 2017. Chemical composition and resistance to oxidation of high-oleic rapeseed oil pressed from microwave pre-treated intact and de-hulled seeds. 2107. Grasas Aceites 68, e225. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0775171
Sawan ZM, Hafez SA, Basyony AE, Alkassas AR. 2007. Nitrogen, potassium and plant growth retardant effect on oil content and quality of cotton seed. Grasas Aceites 58, 243-251. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2007.v58.i3.179
Shoja T, Majidian M, Rabiee M. 2018. Effects of zinc, boron and sulphur on grain yield, activity of some antioxidant enzymes and fatty acid composition of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agri. Slov. 111, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2018.111.1.08
Subhani A, Shabbir G, Fazil M, Mahmood A, Khalid R, Cheema NM. 2003. Role of sulphur in enhancing the oil contents and yield of rapeseed under medium rainfed conditions. Pak. J. Soil Sci. 22, 50-53.
Uncu O, Ozen B, Tokatli F. 2019. Mid-infrared spectroscopic detection of sunflower oil adulteration with safflower oil. Grasas Aceites 70, e290. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0579181
Wang QR, Pinkerton A, Hocking P, Wang QR. 1997. Effects of sulphur top-dressing on yield and quality of a double-low rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Oil Crop. China. 19, 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60083-1
Weiss EA. 1983. Rapeseed. In Oilseed Crops, Longman Group, New York, P.161-215.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
