Elliptic Fourier based analysis and multivariate approaches for size and shape distinctions of walnut (<em>Juglans regia</em> L.) cultivars

B. Demir; B. Sayıncı; N. Çetin; M. Yaman; R. Çömlek; Y. Aydın; M. Sütyemez

doi:10.3989/gya.0104181

Autores/as

B. Demir Department of Mechanical and Metal Technologies, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Mersin University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-4724
B. Sayıncı Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7148-0855
N. Çetin Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Erciyes University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-8272
M. Yaman Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Erciyes University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-2238
R. Çömlek Department of Agricultural Machinery, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Atatürk University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-4343
Y. Aydın Department of Agricultural Machinery, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Atatürk University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-9932
M. Sütyemez Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2417-8009

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0104181

Palabras clave:

Análisis dimensional, Área proyectada, Atributo físico, Descriptor de forma, Índice de forma, Procesamiento de imágenes

Resumen

Los datos de tamaño y forma de los cultivos agrícolas proporcionan grandes fuentes para las tecnologías de procesamiento de alimentos. Los atributos físicos de diferentes frutas deben conocerse para el diseño, desarrollo e innovación de tecnologías alimentarias. En este estudio, las diferencias de tamaño y forma de quince cultivares de nueces nacionales e internacionales (Midland, Sütyemez-1, Serr, Maraş-18, Maraş-12, Sütyemez-2, Kaman-1, Kaman-5, Pedro, Howard, Chandler, Şebin, Şen-2, Bilecik y KR-1) se realizaron mediante elípticas de Fourier y multivariantes. En primer lugar, se determinaron las características gravitacionales de los cultivares de nogal, y sus atributos dimensionales de área y de forma se revelaron mediante el procesamiento de imágenes. El análisis de clusters se utilizó para designar los cultivares de nueces. Los descriptores de elípticas de Fourier obtenidos a partir de contornos de nogal proporcionaron las comparaciones de formas entre los cultivares de nueces. El índice de forma indicó que los cultivares Serr, Sütyemez-2, Midland y Şen-2 tenían forma ovalada, y los otros eran esféricos. El análisis de conglomerados dividió los cultivares de nueces en cuatro subgrupos. Los descriptores de elípticas de Fourier distinguían de manera excelente las formas de las variedades de nueces.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Antonucci F, Costa C, Pallottino F, Paglia G, Rimatori V, De Giorgio D, Menesatti P. 2012. Quantitative method for shape description of almond cultivars (Prunus amygdalus Batsch). Food Bioprocess Technol. 58, 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0389-2

Bayazit S, Kazan K, Gulbitti S, Cevik V, Ayanoglu H, Ergul A. 2007. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in low chill requiring walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes from Hatay, Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 111, 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.11.006

Boydas MG, Sayinci B, Gozlekci S, Oztürk I, Ercisli S. 2012. Basic physical properties of fruits in loquat (Eriobotrya Japonica (Thunb. Lindl.) cultivars and genotypes determined by both classical method and digital image processing. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7, 4171–4181.

Brewer MT, Moyseenko JB, Monforte AJ, Van Der Knaap E. 2007. Morphological variation in tomato: a comprehensive study of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit shape and development. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl301

Cosmulescu S, Baciu A, Achim G, Botu M, Trandafır I. 2009. Mineral composition of fruits in different walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 37, 156–160.

Costa C, Antonucci F, Pallottino F, Aguzzi J, Sun DW, Menesatti P. 2011. Shape analysis of agricultural products: a review of recent research advances and potential application to computer vision. Food Bioprocess Technol. 4, 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0556-0

Costa C, Menesatti P, Paglia G, Pallottino F, Aguzzi J, Rimatori V, Russo G, Recupero S, Recupero GR. 2009. Quantitative evaluation of Tarocco sweet orange fruit shape using optoelectronic Elliptic Fourier based analysis. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 54, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.05.001

Currie AJ, Ganeshanandam S, Noiton DA, Garrick D, Shelbourne CJA, Orgaguzie N. 2000. Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 111, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003862525814

Dursun ?G. 2001. Bazı taneli ürünlerin izdü?üm alanlarının görüntü i?lemeyle belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilim. Derg. 7, 102–107.

Ercisli S, Sayinci B, Kara M, Yildiz C, Ozturk I. 2012. Determination of size and shape features of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars using image processing. Sci. Hortic. 133, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.10.014

FAO (2014). Crops data statistics. http://www.fao.org/faostat/ en/#data/QC - Production. Crops (accessed 05.12.2017).

George C, McGruder R, Torgerson K. 2007. Determination of optimal surface area to volume ratio for thin-layer drying of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis). Int. J. Service Learn. Eng. 2, 76–88.

Ghazanfari A, Irudayaraj J, Kusalik A, Romaniuk M. 1997. Machine vision grading of pistachio nuts using Fourier descriptors. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 68, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0205

Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1–9.

Iwata H, Ukai Y. 2002. SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered. 93, 384–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.5.384

Kara M, Sayıncı B, Elkoca E, Öztürk ?, Özmen TB. 2013. Seed size and shape analysis of registered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Turkey using digital photography. Tarım Bilim. Derg. 19, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001247

Liming X, Yanchao Z. 2010. Automated strawberry grading system based on image processing. Comput. Electron. Agr. 71, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.09.013

Mebatsion HK, Paliwal J, Jayas DS. 2012. Evaluation of variations in the shape of grain types using principal components analysis of the elliptic Fourier descriptors. Comput. Electron. Agr. 80, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.10.016

Mohseni M, Peters B. 2016. Surface area effects on particulate drying in a rotary dryer. 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics. 11 to 13 July, Spain.

Mohsenin NN. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publisher .

Ozkan G, Koyuncu MA. 2005. Physical and chemical composition of some walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes grown in Turkey. Grasas Aceites 56, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2005.v56.i2.122

Patel G. 2005. Essential fats in walnuts are good for the heart and diabetes. J. American Dietetic Assoc. 105, 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.05.193 PMid:15983526

Sadrnia H, Rajabipour A, Jafary A, Javadi A, Mostofi Y. 2007. Classification and analysis of fruit shapes in long type watermelon using image processing. Int. J. Agr. Biol. 9, 68–70.

Sahin ?, Akba? H. 2001. Farklı yöre ve çesitlerden cevizlerin teknolojik özelliklerinin ara?tırılması. Türkiye I. Ulusal Ceviz Sempozyumu, 5–8 Eylül 2001, Tokat, 104–114. (in Turkish)

Sayinci B, Ercisli S, Ozturk I, Eryilmaz Z, Demir B. 2012. Determination of size and shape in the 'Moro' blood orange and 'Valencia' sweet orange cultivar and its mutants using image processing. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40, 234– 242. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4016645

Sayıncı B, Kara M, Ercisli S, Duyar Ö, Ertürk Y. 2015a. Elliptic Fourier analysis for shape distinction of Turkish hazelnut cultivars. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 57, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-014-0221-7

Sayıncı B, Ercisli S, Akbulut M, ?av?atlı Y, Baykal H. 2015b. Determination of shape in fruits of cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) accessions by using Elliptic Fourier analysis. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortoru. 14, 63–82.

Sen SM, Tekinta? FE. 1992. A study on the selection of Adilcevaz walnuts. Acta Hortic. 317, 171–174. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.317.19

Sun D, Costa C, Menesatti P. 2012. Advantages of using quantitative shape descriptors in protocols for plant cultivar and postharvest product quality assessment. Food Bioprocess Technol. 5, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0715-3

Vasallo EGR, Torres MAJ, Demayo CD. 2013. Elliptic Fourier analysis in describing scutes in selected body Regions of Decapterus sp. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinforma. 3, 411–415.