The importance of pretreatment tailoring on the performance of ultrafiltration membranes to treat two-phase olive mill wastewater
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0829142Keywords:
Olive mill wastewater, Pretreatment tailoring, Threshold flux, Ultrafiltration, Wastewater treatmentAbstract
In this work, the performance of an ultrafiltration (UF) membrane in the treatment of the effluents by-produced by olive mills is addressed by applying different pretreatments on the raw effluents. By conducting a photo-catalytic process (UV/TiO2 PC) after pH-temperature flocculation (pH-T F) higher threshold flux values were observed for all feed stocks than by applying solely the pH-T F process, with an 18.8–34.2% increment. In addition, the performance of the UF membrane was also improved in terms of rejection efficiency, such that higher rejection values were yielded by the membrane for the organic pollutants (RCOD) by 48.5 vs. 39.9% and 53.4 vs. 42.0%. The UF membrane performance was also improved in terms of the volume feed recovery factor (VFR), achieving up to 88.2 vs. 87.2% and 90.7 vs. 89.3%. Results in the same line were also observed when the highly polluted olives oil washing wastewater raw stream was previously mixed with the effluent stream coming from the washing of the olives. This permits the UF to permeate, achieving the standard limits to reuse the purified effluent for irrigation purposes (COD values below 1000 mg·L−1), which makes the treatment process cost-effective and results in making the olive oil production process environmentally friendly.
Downloads
References
Akdemir EO, Ozer A. 2009. Investigation of two ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of olive oil mill wastewater. Desalination 249, 660–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.06.035
Aktas ES, Imre S, Esroy L. 2001. Characterization and lime treatment of olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 35, 2336–2340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00490-5
Al-Malah K, Azzam MOJ, Abu-Lail NI. 2000. Olive mills effluent (OME) wastewater post-treatment using activated clay. Sep. Purif. Technol. 20, 225–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00114-3
Ammary BY. 2005. Treatment of olive mill wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Desalination 177, 157–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.12.006
Annesini M, Gironi F. 1991. Olive oil mill effluent: ageing effects on evaporation behavior. Water Research 25, 1157–1960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90210-H
Asfi M, Ouzounidou G, Panajiotidis S, Therios I, Moustakas M. 2012. Toxicity effects of olive-mill wastewater on growth, photosynthesis and pollen morphology of spinach plants. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 80, 69–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.02.030
Bacchin P, Aimar P, Sanchez V. 1996. Influence of surface interaction on transfer during colloid ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 115, 49–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00279-0
Beltrán J, Torregrosa J, García J, Domínguez JR. 2000. Ozone treatment of olive mill wastewater. Grasas y Aceites 51, 32–46.
Borja R, Raposo F, Rincón B. 2006. Treatment technologies of liquid and solid wastes from two-phase olive oil mills. Grasas Aceites 57, 32–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/gya.2006.v57.i1.20
Bouranis DL, Vlyssides AG, Drossopoulos JB, Karvouni G. 1995. Some characteristics of a new organic soil conditioner from the co-composting of olive oil processing wastewater and solid residue. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 26, 2461–2472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369460
Cegarra J, Paredes C, Roig A, Bernal MP, García D. 1996. Use of olive mill wastewater compost for crop production. Int. Biodet. Biodegrad. 38, 193–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(96)00051-0
Danellakis D, Ntaikou I, Kornaros M, Dailianis S. 2011. Olive oil mill wastewater toxicity in the marine environment: Alterations of stress indices in tissues of mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquat. Toxicol. 101, 358–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.11.015
Ena A, Carlozzi P, Pushparaj B, Paperi R, Carnevale S, Sacchi A. 2007. Ability of the aquatic fern Azolla to remove chemical oxygen demand and polyphenols from olive mill wastewater. Grasas Aceites 58, 32–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/gya.2007.v58.i1.6
Espinasse B, Bacchin P, Aimar P. 2002. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration, Desalination 146, 91–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00495-2
Field, RW, Pearce, GK. 2011. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 164, 38–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.008
Fountoulakis MS, Dokianakis SN, Kornaros ME, Aggelis GG, Lyberatos G. 2002. Removal of phenolics in olive mill wastewaters using the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. Water Res. 36, 4735–4744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00184-7
Garrido Hoyos SE, Martínez Nieto L, Camacho Rubio F, Ramos Cormenzana A. 2002. Kinetics of aerobic treatment of olive-mill wastewater (OMW) with Aspergillus terreus. Process Biochem. 37, 1169–1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00332-6
Grafias P, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Mantzavinos D, Diamadopoulos E. 2010. Pilot treatment of olive pomace leachate by vertical-flow constructed wetland and electrochemical oxidation: an efficient hybrid process. Water Research 44, 2773–2780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.015
Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA/ AWWA/WEF, 16th ed., Washington DC. Cabs.
Hodaifa G, Eugenia-Sánchez M, Sánchez S. 2008. Use of industrial wastewater from olive-oil extraction for biomass production of Scenedesmus obliquus. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 1111–1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.020
Hodaifa G, Ochando Pulido JM, Ben-Driss-Alami S, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A. 2013. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of iron adsorption onto olive stones. Ind. Crops Prod. 49, 526–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.05.039
Inan H, Dimoglo A, S¸ims¸ek H, Karpuzcu M. 2004. Olive oil mill wastewater treatment by means of electro-coagulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 36, 23–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00148-5
Karaouzas I, Skoulikidis NT, Giannakou U, Albanis TA. 2011. Spatial and temporal effects of olive mill wastewaters to stream macroinvertebrates and aquatic ecosystems status. Water Res. 45, 6334–6346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.014
Lafi WK, Shannak B, Al-Shannag M, Al-Anber Z, Al-Hasan M. 2009. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by combined advanced oxidation and biodegradation. Separ. Purif. Technol. 70, 141–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.09.008
Martínez Nieto L, Ben Driss Alami S, Hodaifa G, Faur C, Rodríguez Vives S, Giménez Casares JA, Ochando J. 2010. Adsorption of iron on crude olive stones. Ind. Crop. Prod. 32, 467–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.017
Martínez Nieto L, Hodaifa G, Rodríguez Vives S, Giménez Casares JA, Ochando J. 2011a. Flocculation-sedimentation combined with chemical oxidation process. Clean - Soil, air, water 39, 949–955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000594
Martínez Nieto L, Hodaifa G, Rodríguez Vives S, Giménez Casares JA, Ochando J. 2011b. Degradation of organic matter in olive oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 173, 503–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.022
Marques IP. 2001. Anaerobic digestion treatment of olive mill wastewater for effluent re-use in irrigation. Desalination 137, 233–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00224-7
Ntougias S, Gaitis F, Katsaris P, Skoulika S, Iliopoulos N, Zervakis GI. 2013. The effects of olives harvest period and production year on olive mill wastewater properties- Evaluation of Pleurotus strains as bioindicators of the effluent's toxicity. Chemosphere 92, 399–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.033
Ochando Pulido JM, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A. 2012a. The effect of permeate recirculation on the depuration of pretreated olive mill wastewater through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 286, 145–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.041
Ochando Pulido JM, Hodaifa G, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A. 2012b. Impacts of operating conditions on reverse osmosis performance of pretreated olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 46, 4621–4632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.026
Ochando Pulido JM, Hodaifa G, Victor-Ortega MD, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A, 2013a. Reuse of olive mill effluents from two-phase extraction process by integrated advanced oxidation and reverse osmosis treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 263, 158–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.015
Ochando Pulido JM, Hodaifa G, Victor-Ortega MD, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A, 2013b. Effective treatment of olive mill effluents from two-phase and three-phase extraction processes by batch membranes in series operation upon threshold conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 263, 168–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.041
Ochando Pulido JM, Hodaifa G, Victor-Ortega MD, Martinez-Ferez A, 2014. A novel photocatalyst with ferromagnetic core used for the treatment of olive oil mill effluents from two-phase production process. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
Papadimitriou EK, Chatjipavlidis I, Balis C. 1997. Application of composting to olive mill wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. 18, 101–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593331808616517
Paraskeva P, Diamadopoulos E. 2006. Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 81, 475–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1553
Rizzo L, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Belgiorno V. 2008. Pretreatment of olive mill wastewater by chitosan coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Separ. Purif. Technol. 63, 648–653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.07.003
Sacco O, Stoller M, Vaiano V, Ciambelli P, Chianese A, Sannino D. 2012. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes under visible light on n-doped photocatalysts. Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/626759
Sarika R, Kalogerakis N, Mantzavinos D. 2005. Treatment of olive mill effluents. Part II. Complete removal of solids by direct flocculation with poly-electrolytes. Environ. Int. 31, 297–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.10.006
Stoller M. 2008. Technical optimization of a dual ultrafiltration and nanofiltration pilot plant in batch operation by means of the critical flux theory: a case study. Chem. Eng. Process. 47, 1165–1170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.07.012
Stoller M. 2009. On the effect of flocculation as pretreatment process and particle size distribution for membrane fouling reduction. Desalination 240, 209–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.042
Stoller M. 2011. Effective fouling inhibition by critical flux based optimization methods on a NF membrane module for olive mill wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 168, 1140–1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.098
Stoller M, Bravi M. 2010. Critical flux analyses on differently pretreated olive vegetation wastewater streams: some case studies. Desalination 250, 578–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.027
Stoller M, Ochando Pulido JM. 2012. Going from a critical flux concept to a threshold flux concept on membrane processes treating olive mill wastewater streams. Procedia Eng. 44, 607–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.500
Tezcan Ü, Ugur S, Koparal AS, Ögutveren ÜB. 2006. Electrocoagulation of olive mill wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 52, 136–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.029
Turano E, Curcio S, De Paola M G, Calabrò V, Iorio G. 2002. An integrated centrifugation–ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater, J. Membr. Sci. 206, 519–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00369-1
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
